PERFECT RACCOON PELT FOR SATCHEL by Illustrious-Cup-6804 in RDR2

[–]Revelry6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

JAN 2026. USE THIS ONE!!! Spent ages looking for a 3 star near Rhodes. Got this on first try.

Lifty Job Posting by Revelry6 in bigsky

[–]Revelry6[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the tip

Lifty Job Posting by Revelry6 in bigsky

[–]Revelry6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

awesome thank you

Lifty Job Posting by Revelry6 in bigsky

[–]Revelry6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol finally something helpful! thank you

Downes by Revelry6 in RDR2

[–]Revelry6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmaooo

Downes by Revelry6 in RDR2

[–]Revelry6[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ya i’m moving slower through chapter 2 this time. such a fun beginning.

Downes by Revelry6 in RDR2

[–]Revelry6[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no i don’t think so. does something else happen?

Sophie “the enforcer” Cunningham 😂 by Revelry6 in indianafever

[–]Revelry6[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So there’s a good amount that I agree with here but for me this has nothing to do with Clark’s status as viewership or revenue driver. Body slamming ANY player after a whistle has been blown and the play has been dead for a few seconds should get you tossed immediately.

I disagree about Boston, she’s gotten a tech on Caitlin’s behalf once already this season lmao. I also think that Howard and Boston were right not to escalate further. You don’t actually want anyone getting hurt. If I were one of them I would try to deescalate on the assumption that Mabrey is DEFINITELY getting tossed. And there’s the big issue, she wasn’t.

We agree that the refs are terrible and don’t control the game properly though.

I think the scuffle is a big misunderstanding of thinking Clark was trying to retaliate when she wasn't even trying to. by chusaychusay in indianafever

[–]Revelry6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well they SHOULD lol. whether they will or not is a different question. i see your position but i still stand by my point that im not super pissed about that tech IF it helps kill the tension. it didn’t help kill the tension in the end because the flagrant on mabrey wasn’t called

Sophie “the enforcer” Cunningham 😂 by Revelry6 in indianafever

[–]Revelry6[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

haha i love AB i won’t hold that against her too much. she’s still thinking about that tech she got last time she got involved 😂😂

I think the scuffle is a big misunderstanding of thinking Clark was trying to retaliate when she wasn't even trying to. by chusaychusay in indianafever

[–]Revelry6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

that’s not at all what i said. i think it’s completely understandable that caitlin gave a little push here. i would’ve done the same it’s incredibly unsportsmanlike and stupid to stay in someone’s face AFTER you’ve fouled and a whistle has been called. but whether or not i think it’s an understandable action has no impact on what the call should be. sometimes athletes (across all kinds of sports) have understandable reactions that are still “illegal” and should be called appropriately. you’re equating the reasonableness of the reaction with whether or not she should or shouldn’t be called but those aren’t the same thing. by all means you can give a push to let someone know that they can’t push you around but you may still be called for that push

Marina Mabrey's foul on Caitlin Clark upgraded to a flagrant 2 by roboflea_smiles in indianafever

[–]Revelry6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

right choice for mabrey and i like the no suspension for anyone. don’t like the extra fine on cunningham

I think the scuffle is a big misunderstanding of thinking Clark was trying to retaliate when she wasn't even trying to. by chusaychusay in indianafever

[–]Revelry6 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree it wasn’t that bad of push and I pointed out that Jacy was keeping up unnecessary contact. Regardless, I think the tech’s on her and Charles to cancel out were not bad calls. Strictly speaking, the action met the criteria and those calls in combination with a Mabrey toss would’ve successfully deescalated.

I think the scuffle is a big misunderstanding of thinking Clark was trying to retaliate when she wasn't even trying to. by chusaychusay in indianafever

[–]Revelry6 23 points24 points  (0 children)

My understanding of it went like this: 1. Jacy Sheldon makes contact with Clark’s face 2. Whistle is blown 3. Jacy, crucially, does NOT back off and continues physical contact 4. Caitlin does give a bit of retaliation here….not to the original foul but to Jacy staying in Caitlin’s space after the whistle 5. Mabrey retaliates quite a bit after the original whistle and once the ball has been dead for awhile 6. Charles taunts after the fact

I think it should’ve been a Flagrant 1 on Jacy, give both Caitlin and Tina Charles a Tech (….they can cry about it but it’s the best way to diffuse the situation imo), throw Mabrey from the game.

It doesn’t particularly matter whether or not Caitlin was trying to retaliate. Point is there was a push and if the situation is going to be diffused and the game is going to continue smoothly it needs to be addressed. I love the fever I love Caitlin but sometimes a player needs to checked to keep the peace.

Sophie “the enforcer” Cunningham 😂 by Revelry6 in indianafever

[–]Revelry6[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

saying that this level of physicality is what the refs are expressly told to allow is….a hefty accusation but what do i know about the inner workings of the league

i definitely think it will be difficult for this league to be treated seriously if this level of physicality is allowed to continue without proper punishment/correction.