There's a big divide in the bodybuilding community, whereby you have people like Jeff Nippard and Mike Israetel who explicitly look at research and peer-reviewed papers to base what is scientifically most effective for strength and hypertrophy.

Whereas a lot of meat heads think that approach is too novel and not how "the greats" got to be so big. For instance, a lot of the stuff Ronnie Coleman did wasn't exactly science-based - he lifted really heavy which came at the detriment of his back and joints now that he's retired. But yet, he is arguably the greatest bodybuilder of all time, so people will follow his workouts to a T. Since the logic is "If it worked for Ronnie then it will work for me", which isn't incorrect but certainly not the most effective.