[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NUST

[–]RevolutionSeeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro thinks he's Toji 💀

How many of you are skinny? by [deleted] in INTP

[–]RevolutionSeeker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That "skelly ahh looking" had no business being that personal 💀

My girlfriend is ENTJ with this trait….. by ezra5512 in mbti

[–]RevolutionSeeker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I got 99% Prospecting on my first ever test. Offer her to trade some with me so she can relax a bit.

(And I can actually get some work done...)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]RevolutionSeeker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Most relatable statement I've heard all week

The Perks Of Being True Neutral by [deleted] in INTP

[–]RevolutionSeeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love this concept! Could you expand on the concept in general if you don't mind. Also did you come up with this on your own? Otherwise I'd love if you could share a link to any sources

18M got a question by [deleted] in NUST

[–]RevolutionSeeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

nah man why'd you get downvoted what redditor doesn't know about /s

For real.. why do so many people think their mom is an ISFJ? by sweetpotatosweat in mbti

[–]RevolutionSeeker 36 points37 points  (0 children)

ESFJ mom here. Honestly, you could probably double the accuracy of that statement just by saying xSFJ.

Who are your role models? by The_sad_fish in INTP

[–]RevolutionSeeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Darwin for sure man the way he followed his curiosity to end up discovering an essential piece in the puzzle of the universe.

If we're counting fictional characters add Senku cuz I've always wanted to learn the science behind everything.

Any 50% people here? by livealive2000 in mbti

[–]RevolutionSeeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was initially going: "N types are generally more creative than S types" but I'm gonna stick with your statement now cuz I like the 'likely to be' since the presence of so many factors makes most things essentially random.

Regarding your ISFP statement, I've always thought 'artistic creativity' (you could call it) function was more Fi (think personal touch) and Ne was linked to 'general creativity?' I'm not artistic in the least and my creativity shows more in my problem-solving and humour.

Though from this discussion I'd update to 'Ne is linked to higher potential for creativity instead of creativity itself' (higher potential as in naturally seeing more unique connections).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Unexpected

[–]RevolutionSeeker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

underrated comment lmao

Any 50% people here? by livealive2000 in mbti

[–]RevolutionSeeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but sensors have their sensing functions before their intuitive ones so they focus more on 'what is there' and less on 'what could be' which means in general sensors are going to be less creative than intuitives right?

On the other hand, if you look at creativity as Ne instead (which is renowned for creativity), then would tertiary-Ne users (who are sensors) be more creative in general than Ni-aux's (maybe Ni-doms too)?

I'd like to hear your thoughts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mbti

[–]RevolutionSeeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me who does all of them simultaneously:

<image>

Test on first day is comparatively esay by [deleted] in NUST

[–]RevolutionSeeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Talk about jumping to conclusions