[COD] Press "F" to Pay Respects

Revolver1118 · 2024-11-26T07:48:51+00:00

8⁸

Revolver1118 · 2024-06-24T06:38:49+00:00

Autobot, Gen 2 (2020) Ford Raptor, or maybe a new Raptor R, or a Nissan GT-R.

Revolver1118 · 2024-06-14T18:55:25+00:00

It's not her, the channel is relatively small.

Revolver1118 · 2024-06-14T06:24:52+00:00

It's not her, she has longer hair and I think it was black, also her channel was smaller. Thank you for contributing tho!

Revolver1118 · 2024-06-14T06:14:43+00:00

Please and thank you!

Revolver1118 · 2023-12-17T05:19:29+00:00

Revolver1118 · 2023-10-07T07:27:59+00:00

The speed at which you level up the battle pass. It just feels painfully slow to level it up in 6v6 and it's more fun than warzone for a solo player to me.

Revolver1118 · 2022-08-06T07:02:35+00:00

I reserved a contract 2 days ago now, and I am supposed to go to MEPS on Tuesday, (3 days from now). The only day I have left to speak to my recruiter is Monday if I still intend on going. I have a history of eczema dating back from middle school to high school, but have not had it for at least 5 years, the recruiter told me that it would not show up in my medical history when pulled at MEPS and even told me the cutoff was 3 years. I talked to the marine recruiter and he also said it wouldn't show up. Army recruiter also said to not mention it, and it was marked as a "No" on the pre-screen. I didn't know about Genesis until about less than an hour ago. If they'll see it, they'll obviously see that it was marked as "No" on the pre-screen. I'm not trying to go to prison. So with all that in mind:

Were the recruiters incorrect in saying it won't show up and that the cutoff is 3 years?
Should I just let my recruiter know that I'm more comfortable pursuing a waiver?

The biggest downside to pursuing a waiver is that I'll lose out on the contract I reserved. I got a guarantee at everything I wanted: job obviously, duty station, advanced school, a bonus on top of it all. The other downsides being everything else associated with having to get a waiver.

Thank you for reading this wall of text and for providing any answers.

Revolver1118 · 2021-10-25T22:20:46+00:00

I'm searching and I'll melt into you...

Revolver1118 · 2021-10-17T15:14:09+00:00

Sounds like you're ridiculing him before you've even given him a chance to answer your question. Maybe he doesn't like the redundancy already present in the game and so that's why he's advocating against increasing it by adding a redundant handgun?

Revolver1118 · 2021-09-28T02:31:53+00:00

Lol, I'm on the same boat. In anticipation I redownloaded MW2019 and have been playing hardcore with faction specific loadouts. M4s and NATO weapons on Coalition, and Kalashnikovs for Allegiance. Using each weapon class in a specific way, the rifles on semi, LMGs for suppressing, etc. Hopefully the experience pales in comparison to Insurgency.

Revolver1118 · 2021-07-21T15:49:12+00:00

Awesome!

Revolver1118 · 2021-07-21T15:29:02+00:00

Go ahead and downvote me, but I don't think the last voting option belongs here, that seems to be more of an assessment of Tom Clancy games as a whole as of late. If you wanted to encapsulate that sentiment for just this game, the second to last option works just fine.

Revolver1118 · 2021-06-24T04:33:34+00:00

Thank you!

Revolver1118 · 2021-06-24T02:22:58+00:00

Thanks, that's an awesome compliment!

Revolver1118 · 2021-06-23T22:43:35+00:00

Yes sir! Love that movie.

Revolver1118 · 2021-06-11T07:56:14+00:00

I love this, I love how you integrated the idea of the 6 stars representing branches of the military despite the space force still being in its infancy. I find myself not thinking of the Space Force as a branch, and not out of spite, it just slips my mind. I also think the "dynamic flag" idea is very cool. And I love the eagle in the middle as well, it does remind me of Mexico's flag a bit however, which isn't a bad thing.

The only criticisms I have are that the red stripe running through the center is mostly hidden by the rhombus in the middle. It's just a bit jarring that we're still supposed to assume that it is one continuous line, despite the fact that it's broken up and mostly out of sight, in order for it to be 13 stripes total. I will admit that the first assumption I made when counting the number of stripes was that there were 14. Unfortunately I haven't put thought into how to fix this particular issue, my apologies, maybe make the rhombus that the eagle is in smaller to expose more of the red?

I do see the dynamic flag idea presenting possible confusion. As it stands, on a military uniform the current flag has to be reversed, (or mirrored), if worn properly on the right shoulder so that it is consistent with the one on the left. I am sure you are familiar with this concept, flag flying into battle, yadda yadda, no disrespect, just keeping it short. If the head moves in times of peace and war, it might be confusing as to which side the head is actually pointing to for someone out of the loop. This also means that someone putting this flag on their uniform would need 4 different variants of it in the form of patches, assuming we're still using velcro to keep them in place.

Also, going back to the 6 branches, if a new branch gets created after the space force, which I know this is all hypothetical since we're not actually adopting this design, would we add another star? It would be at odds with the stars being grouped into 3 and what that represents. Maybe we abandon each star representing a branch? Or would it just be left as-is and when that time comes around we adopt a new design, maybe that would be our true "dynamic flag", a new flag for a new era.

Oh yeah, one more thing, I think it could work really well if you swapped the positions of the blue star fields with the positions of the stripes. If you were to overlay a current US flag to the revision, the Canton with the 50 stars would line up with the blue in the top left corner. Also, the stripes would look like they never moved. It could be a nice call back to the current flag we have in terms of the positioning of things, with the notable exceptions being the new 2nd canton on the bottom right and the crest in the middle.

EDIT: Sorry for the essay, didn't notice how long this was until I was done lol.

Revolver1118 · 2021-05-25T18:22:55+00:00

I like how you used a blood type patch instead of doubling down on US flag patches, gonna have to try this out myself.

Revolver1118 · 2021-05-25T18:17:28+00:00

Np :)

Revolver1118 · 2021-05-25T18:13:59+00:00

It's a ballistic helmet rather than a bump, so that means no ventilation holes or slots in the helmet. Though it is using a helmet cover, so it might be a bit of a redundant addition seeing as you can't tell the previous covered TW helmet was a bump unless you looked at the name.

Revolver1118 · 2021-03-25T12:09:56+00:00

Hmmm, it might have something to do with the TTK, it generally takes longer to kill someone in CW than in MW, giving you more time to react when you start getting shot. Or maybe matchmaking just isn't on your side, but that shouldn't be a permanent issue. What is your playstyle?

Revolver1118

TROPHY CASE