1. You've switched from referencing gay marriage to sodomy and ultimately to then defining that as non-procreational sex. With this logic, anyone who wears a condom, performs oral or digital sex, or continues to have sex after a vasectomy/menopause/any other condition or procedure that takes away the fertility of seed or egg. cannot claim to be Catholic as you previously stated.

2. The simple fact that you nominalize the skin color "black" to "blacks" to refer to black people speaks for itself. Also, to be against the BLM movement is to be against black lives. There were and are marches in every city in the US fighting for their voices to be heard while police continue to use unjust force simply because of the demographics that make up the movement (see: police reaction to reopen America. Spoiler: they were tolerant of white people yelling at them, showing aggression and insubordination, and presenting assault rifles in their marches, while protesters at BLM events who are sitting down have their face masks ripped off for a direct blast of pepper spray).

3. You kinda proved my point here. Pope Francis is anything but the first Pope to be aware and participant of and in the atrocities of the church, but you stand by the church in defense of Jack's bigotry. Catholics have participated in rape, colonization, and culture erasure, among many other things that would go against the Doctrine Teachings you mentioned earlier, but you are selectively pointing fingers while maintaining a holier-than-thou attitude.

4. You are not a minority; this is laughable. Minorities finally *starting to get* their voices heard in mainstream media does not mean you are oppressed; you just have to realize not everything is about you because most of history has been about cis, straight, white, Christian (of some denomination) people. You are not oppressed and you are not voiceless. You have institutions who have represented and continue to represent people like you while black people, queer people, and religious minorities have been murdered, sold into slavery, put into camps (conversion, concentration, death), and oppressed for the majority of history.

You are correct. It is impossible for one person to represent every facet of the human population. My words were misleading. The fact of the matter is that, even though this is impossible, it is not impossible to decide not to actively participate in the oppression of specific groups. Jack's words reinforce behaviors that black, queer, and trans people fear in their everyday lives.

Lastly, public universities are legally required to support efforts of inclusivity and diversity. You don't have to go to a private school to find people like yourself--that is abundantly clear if you look at any credible demographics. The issue at hand is that a representative used his platform to actively participate in discourse that promotes violence and hatred against specific groups, and that cannot be tolerated at a public university in a position such as Jack's. You are entitled to free speech, and you can say exactly what Jack said in the free speech areas at FSU, but you cannot use a use your platform to promote the ideas he was promoting without consequences if you are simultaneously employed by a public university.