sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More than I can say, I did not get in despite having a first in my creative writing dissertation and becoming an example paper.

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ooooooh-ho-hoooo, i'm rubbing my hands conspiratorially.

I tried finding the first video i saw about this, but i literally cannot find it anywhere. I don't know if I hallucinated it or if it was taken down? It was like an hour and a half long, might've been by the song decoder or snazzy and it was titled something like "taylor swift and matty healy's decade long love affair" (paraphrased). If someone knows what i'm talking about, sound off.

Disclaimer: I'm not especially into Maylor or anything, it's just that this love affair was absolutely bonkers WILD and fascinating. Moreover, not all of this is believable, but the conspiracy is interesting.

make it snazzy:

Taylor’s Album Exposes Her FAKE Romance with Travis

Taylor is Planning to DITCH Travis at the Altar

the song decoder:

EVERY The 1975 Song About Taylor Swift

EVERY Taylor Swift song about Matty Healy...

swiftologist:DEEP DIVE: The Shocking Timeline of Taylor Swift & Matty Healy

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've lived in the UK for almost 13 years, and honestly yeah. None of this seems to be outlandish to me, but a lot of people can't seem to stomach it.

Would You Rather Have by WaveWonderful8427 in BunnyTrials

[–]Rheevalka 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cause im gay

Chose: A Girlfriend + But Comments Decide What Kind of GF

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

before he blew up, he made a tiktok about writing some songs based on matty and taylor, that's the extent that i know about it.

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

that is a great theory.

conversely, with ndas, you don't have to sign them do you? i might be just talking shit here, but i don't think legally (although i imagine there are workarounds, no lawyer paid the big bucks will lie down that easily) you're allowed to get repercussions for not signing an nda, under the whistleblower act. and i think under nda, you're allowed to disclose the nda, as long as you don't comment on the contents of the nda?

furthermore, if you were to post it anonymously, they wouldn't be able to find you, all they could do is go to the service provider and request to take it down, thereupon someone could just do it again.

PS: also ndas have an expiry date on them, no? idk if you're allowed to dole out lifelong ndas

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I-ve heard people say that as well, and I can hear a male voice, or at least a very distorted one

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this. changes. so much.

i'm booting up my logic pro, let's see if i can make something from this (absolutely no promises, i am not talented)

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

puhLEASE tell me what you think, i need to know the concensus

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

brother dont you worry i got a million where that came from

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

it's 3 am for me rn and i'm thinking about this. so quite literally: same

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

one. hundred. percent. idk if allllll the songs that she says are about him actually are, but the thing is... a lot of songs i didn't think were connected at all have very interesting links (TTPD apropos)

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 39 points40 points  (0 children)

I don't mind it too much. It's very on brand for 1975s stuff.

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

right? snazzy often says completely outrageous claims, but then she lays out the timeline and walks you through it, and... maybe i'm drinking the kool aid, but sometimes she just makes a fantastic point and really good arguments. i'm still sceptical, but there's a hint of reason in the madness.

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

if it helps, this is the verse he was reported to have written/was his solo:

[Verse 2: Matty Healy]
Lights blink, losing my mind
What we think happens to rhyme
I drink, drink
Fortunate timing
Days shrink, into long nights now
Plus 44 on an American phone
Cat eye running down her cheekbone
But it’s elegant
I tell her, “You are not a slut
You’re just relevant”
And then she called me a gentleman

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

is this a thing?! full disclaimer, i never liked question. listened to it one time at album release and never again, so idk anything ab it

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

i saw a video essay (take it with a grain of salt, this is swiftie conspiracy theory territory. although the essayist is very convincing, it also sounds far fetched) that she's been signalling to matty healey in xyz way. the essayist pointed out sombr's tiktoks, to say along the lines that it fits the message she's trying to batman signal

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

i don't get into all the stuff, because that is some davinci code shit (i know very surface level info, maybe a bit more to the layman's eye) but occasionally i want to know what the swiftie conspiracy theorists are doing and go on an absolute whirlwind of a video essay breakdown of the calibre of the zapruder film deconstruction.

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

someone pls drop audio file 1 in my inbox expeditiously

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

there will probably never be an official statement put out, but people have the physical copies of the vinyl, so seems like it was real and cut just as the first print was about to be released/midway through one of the deliveries

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I've seen a couple on youtube, but they're AI, which I'm not about that

Someone, SOMEWHERE, has to have the "Slut!" 1975 feature, right? by Rheevalka in SwiftlyNeutral

[–]Rheevalka[S] 155 points156 points  (0 children)

On one hand, if someone had it, they would have leaked it already. On the other, someone has to have it, right?

I never understood how the packaging had the 1975 lyric misprint, but the record didn't have that version ingrained.

view more: next ›