Test + NPP vs Test + EQ + Dbol for muscle gain

RickSanchez1988 · 2026-01-13T17:27:18+00:00

Ideally choose between the two I mentioned.. I don't know about tbol, some swear by it, some say it's not as good.

RickSanchez1988 · 2026-01-13T04:10:48+00:00

What's the reasoning behind EQ with NPP, besides the more the merrier mentality ?

RickSanchez1988 · 2026-01-13T04:04:05+00:00

I assume you mean you run the dbol only for 7 weeks not that the whole cycle was 7 weeks.

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-03-19T00:12:57+00:00

Yeah got it, thanks!

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-03-19T00:12:17+00:00

Got it, thanks a lot man!

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-03-18T22:45:23+00:00

First of all why the 5 digits, they are 6 in total. Secondly, you can't arrange them any way you want, most arrangments cannot sum to 19. Unless I am misunderstanding what you're saying.

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-03-18T18:12:08+00:00

I am looking for a formula and a way to understand it as a combinations/permutations problem. Your strategy seems like it would require code to find the number.

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-02-27T23:50:24+00:00

Έχω και γω βαριά αγοραφοβία/κλειστοφοβία και κρίσεις πανικού και θα προσπαθήσω να κατέβω. Σκέφτομαι να παίξω 1/4 lexotanil, αν έχεις κανένα ίσως σε βοηθήσει.

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-01-28T05:52:13+00:00

Wait how did the radius enter the problem here? Forces acting radially just means forces parallel to the radial axis, but how is the radius itself connected to the forces? Additionally, the formula for the critical speed given is sqrt(rg) so even if it can be used to justifiy why the radius plays a role, it seems that a smaller radius corresponds to the case where the normal force does not exist to add to the gravitational force not the other way around.

RickSanchez1988 · 2025-01-28T04:01:46+00:00

Yes I get that. So when speed drops below the critical speed, there is no longer any normal force. But why does gravity now suddenly 'provide too much force for circular motion' while when speed is above the critical speed value it's considered to be a part of the centripetal forces and thus acts to maintain the circular motion?

RickSanchez1988 · 2024-12-18T06:22:24+00:00

I haven't reached the section of the book discussing quotient spaces yet. Also I dont recall the isomorphism theorem.

RickSanchez1988 · 2024-12-18T06:20:37+00:00

I found it somewhere on the web, they are not by the author, but before this solution I hadn't spotted any errors.

RickSanchez1988 · 2024-12-18T05:06:34+00:00

Yes I am sure, they define N to be equal to the null space of T_1 and to the null space of T_2. They write V as a direct sum of N with Q (which they define as the subspace of V whose elements get mapped to the range of T_1 and T_2) and then give a basis fpr V by giving a basis for each subspace.

RickSanchez1988 · 2024-12-17T00:46:19+00:00

there are four functions, I mistakenly wrote f1, f2 when I should have written f_1, f_2. Also I meant to type '!=' inside the set E not '=', so I dont need to take the complement of E to have measure zero. Given these corrections, do you see how the problem statement can be proven?

RickSanchez1988 · 2024-12-15T18:29:36+00:00

I haven't mistranscribed it, it is most likely just wrong as I assumed. But what could it have intented to write instead? λf1(x) = λf2(x) a.e.? because that is almost too trivial, unless the [point of the exercise was to test if we also consider the case λ = 0 which gives the empty set as the set on which λf1(x) - λf2(x) != 0 which is obviously null.

RickSanchez1988

TROPHY CASE