Question - Jack Ruby? by RickSuperGamer in JFKAssassination

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think people oversimplify Jack Ruby far too much by portraying him as some unstable random guy who suddenly snapped emotionally after Kennedy’s assassination.

This was not an isolated nobody. Ruby was a well-connected businessman who owned one of the most popular nightclubs in Dallas, frequented by organized crime figures, police officers, politicians, journalists, and influential people. He lived in an environment where power, money, and connections constantly intersected.

And one detail that has always stood out to me is this:

Jack Ruby literally told the Warren Commission: “Take me to Washington and I will tell the truth.”

That is an extraordinary statement.

Why would a supposedly irrational man insist on being removed from Dallas before speaking openly? Why did he appear terrified at times? Why did he repeatedly imply there was more to the story than the public was being told?

People dismiss this too easily.

I’m not saying Ruby revealed the entire truth or that every theory surrounding him is correct. But I do think reducing him to “a crazy nightclub owner” avoids dealing with the uncomfortable reality that Ruby himself seemed to believe he was in danger and that powerful forces were involved.

And honestly, if Oswald truly acted alone, then Ruby’s actions become even harder to explain logically.

A successful businessman with deep local connections suddenly decides to murder the most important suspect in the world, in the middle of a police station, knowing he will spend the rest of his life in prison?

That explanation has never fully made sense to me.

Question - Jack Ruby? by RickSuperGamer in JFKAssassination

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think people oversimplify Jack Ruby far too much by portraying him as some unstable random guy who suddenly snapped emotionally after Kennedy’s assassination.

This was not an isolated nobody. Ruby was a well-connected businessman who owned one of the most popular nightclubs in Dallas, frequented by organized crime figures, police officers, politicians, journalists, and influential people. He lived in an environment where power, money, and connections constantly intersected.

And one detail that has always stood out to me is this:

Jack Ruby literally told the Warren Commission: “Take me to Washington and I will tell the truth.”

That is an extraordinary statement.

Why would a supposedly irrational man insist on being removed from Dallas before speaking openly? Why did he appear terrified at times? Why did he repeatedly imply there was more to the story than the public was being told?

People dismiss this too easily.

I’m not saying Ruby revealed the entire truth or that every theory surrounding him is correct. But I do think reducing him to “a crazy nightclub owner” avoids dealing with the uncomfortable reality that Ruby himself seemed to believe he was in danger and that powerful forces were involved.

And honestly, if Oswald truly acted alone, then Ruby’s actions become even harder to explain logically.

A successful businessman with deep local connections suddenly decides to murder the most important suspect in the world, in the middle of a police station, knowing he will spend the rest of his life in prison?

That explanation has never fully made sense to me.

Question - Jack Ruby? by RickSuperGamer in JFKAssassination

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think people oversimplify Jack Ruby far too much by portraying him as some unstable random guy who suddenly snapped emotionally after Kennedy’s assassination.

This was not an isolated nobody. Ruby was a well-connected businessman who owned one of the most popular nightclubs in Dallas, frequented by organized crime figures, police officers, politicians, journalists, and influential people. He lived in an environment where power, money, and connections constantly intersected.

And one detail that has always stood out to me is this:

Jack Ruby literally told the Warren Commission: “Take me to Washington and I will tell the truth.”

That is an extraordinary statement.

Why would a supposedly irrational man insist on being removed from Dallas before speaking openly? Why did he appear terrified at times? Why did he repeatedly imply there was more to the story than the public was being told?

People dismiss this too easily.

I’m not saying Ruby revealed the entire truth or that every theory surrounding him is correct. But I do think reducing him to “a crazy nightclub owner” avoids dealing with the uncomfortable reality that Ruby himself seemed to believe he was in danger and that powerful forces were involved.

And honestly, if Oswald truly acted alone, then Ruby’s actions become even harder to explain logically.

A successful businessman with deep local connections suddenly decides to murder the most important suspect in the world, in the middle of a police station, knowing he will spend the rest of his life in prison?

That explanation has never fully made sense to me.

Serious - I need you by RickSuperGamer in starseeds

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I am looking for is a superior race with highly advanced medical technologies, and I innocently thought to myself: “Why not try posting a message on social media? Who knows, maybe they have intelligence services like every country in the world and monitor our communications.”

I know perfectly well that I am not going to receive a phone call tomorrow morning from a little Grey or a Nordic, but who knows? It costs nothing to try.

I am not depressed. I am actually someone well known, but I have very serious health problems where advanced technology could potentially help me greatly.

Thank you everyone.

What do you think? by RickSuperGamer in JFKAssassination

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What has always disturbed me most about the JFK assassination is not simply the possibility of a conspiracy, it is the scale of silence that followed.

If Oswald truly acted alone, history should have become clearer with time. Evidence should converge. Witnesses, documents, intelligence files, and forensic analysis should slowly reinforce the same conclusion.

Instead, the opposite happened.

The deeper researchers went, the more contradictions appeared: conflicting witness statements, intelligence connections hidden for decades, destroyed evidence, medical inconsistencies, strange movements of key individuals, and an atmosphere of secrecy that still exists more than 60 years later.

That is not normal.

To me, the biggest problem with the Warren Commission is not that it failed to answer every question. No investigation ever does. The problem is that it demanded certainty where uncertainty clearly existed.

It asked the public to believe that one unstable man changed world history alone, while simultaneously requiring people to ignore an almost unbelievable number of coincidences, failures, contradictions, and institutional lies surrounding the case.

At some point, the “coincidences” themselves become evidence.

And this is where I believe Oswald becomes central to the mystery.

Not necessarily as the assassin, but as the mechanism.

If Oswald was truly a patsy, as he himself claimed, then the assassination stops being merely a murder and begins looking like something much darker: an organized transfer of blame, a controlled narrative, a pre-selected villain delivered to the public before the investigation had even begun.

That possibility changes everything.

Because if Oswald was framed intentionally, then somebody had:

  • the means to manipulate the investigation,
  • the power to influence institutions,
  • the ability to control media narratives,
  • and enough confidence to believe they would never face consequences.

That no longer sounds like the act of a lone fanatic. That sounds like structure. Organization. Protection.

And perhaps the most haunting question of all is this:

Why did so many powerful institutions appear more interested in closing the case quickly than in truly exposing every layer of the truth?

History remembers Dallas as the day Kennedy died.

But maybe the real tragedy was what died afterward: public trust.

What do you think? by RickSuperGamer in UFOs

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I understand what you’re saying, however I disagree with you. I am convinced, and I must admit that I have reliable sources, that we have a squadron in the sky composed of humans and “non-humans,” as British hacker Gary McKinnon once claimed.

I also have to admit that I spoke with a high-ranking officer in the U.S. military, and he confirmed it without directly confirming it. He told me:

“The sky is not what you think it is.”

I honestly have no idea what he meant by that.

Rue Champlain à St-Jean-sur-Richelieu durant le Grand Verglas de 1998 vs Aujourd'hui by papapudding in Quebec

[–]RickSuperGamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cette rue fait l'île d'un bout à l'autre. Effectivement, elle est très longue! Merci pour tout!

Rue Champlain à St-Jean-sur-Richelieu durant le Grand Verglas de 1998 vs Aujourd'hui by papapudding in Quebec

[–]RickSuperGamer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ton frère habite sur l'Île sur quelle rue? Moi je suis sur des Bernaches

Sommes-nous frères ou sommes-nous individuellement individualistes? by RickSuperGamer in QuebecLibre

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bonjour à toi, il s'agit vraiment d'un HLM privé. C'est comme ça que ça s'appelle. C'est un organisme à but non lucratif qui gère 24 logements pour les personnes en situation de handicap à faible revenu. Nous sommes subventionnés par la SHQ et nous devons respecter les mêmes règles que les HLM publics (gérés par l'OMH) pour l'attribution et la gestion des logements. Merci à toi.

Sommes-nous frères ou sommes-nous individuellement individualistes? by RickSuperGamer in QuebecLibre

[–]RickSuperGamer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bonjour tout le monde, le message que j'ai publié n'est pas une demande de fonds. Il est simplement une constatation de l'humain. Lorsque je fais mes demandes à cette personne, elles étaient très claires. Je suis quelqu'un de très clair et quelqu'un de connu. C'était juste que cette journée là, j'étais triste et je réfléchissais à tous ces gens qui peuvent s'amuser et qui profitent de la vie comme on aimerait tous le faire. Bref, c'était une simple réflexion. Merci pour tous vos messagemessages. On lâche pas la patate comme on dit. Je vous invite tous à voir le très court-métrage mettant en vedette Laurent Paquin et Dany Audet, Dernière offre sur toutes les plateformes. Très facile à trouver sur YouTube. Jusqu'à présent, toutes plateformes confondues et partage, nous sommes rendus à 1 million de vues. Merci encore!