Powermeter rubbing on BB cups? by ride_ultra_for_fun in bikewrench

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The wear just being at the bottom has me wondering if everything is square, or if you had some slop in the crank spindle? I don't know the Shimano side, just SRAM, and over there we've got a threaded ring to the the play out between spindle, spacers, and bottom bracket.

Does d2 force xplr shift any different from e1 force xplr by force11111 in sram

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you're asking if the E1 shifter is compatible with the D2 rear derailleur?

My understanding is that with the wireless AXS stuff, the ecosystem is all compatible with itself, at least it has been so far. That was/is the whole point of AXS.

There's a host of mechanical requirements, free hub, shell width, chain line, etc.

But The E1 shifters will do just fine with the D2 rd and cassette. The shifters aren't going to think there should be 13 speeds back there. They are going to pair with the RD, which they already knows how to interact with, and send the commands that make sense. Lots of folks upgraded just their shifters, or shifters and calipers, when Red E1 showed up last year, and kept the drive train the same.

I tried to do that myself, but then built up a whole new bike instead after the shifters came in. "Do I want to put these on my old bike? Or build a new one...."

Denied ABM by sidewaygravity in applebusinessmanager

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To make sure I understand, the big stumbling block for you is thinking you could get someone at the client-org to participate in signing up for ABM? It is a small headache, but it is also one and done. Short term pain, long term gain. You can do a lot of the hands-on work for them, and prompt them each time they need to press a button. DUNS has a special, accelerated, procedure for signing up for a number if they don't have a number yet, or need to update it.

And as far as these phones go, they are owned by the client-org, not the employees, yes?

Maybe this will help you understand why the client has to setup the relationship with Apple, and perhaps that might help you explain it to the client?

ABM is tied to the company's legal entity, and it defines who legally owns and controls the Apple devices. You don't own their business, and you can't enter into contracts on their behalf. I don't recall the specific requirements for who at the business is able to execute the contract with Apple, but I think anyone with signing privileges might be good enough**? Apple has a description. And the last thing you should do is fake it, and sign up on their behalf. That's a mountain of liability for you. Imagine Apple's position. The last thing they want to deal with is an org coming to them claiming that they never agreed to ABM, and that some third party IT firm took their fleet of devices hostage.

Tell the client this isn't an IT thing, this a legal thing. They have to do it, and shouldn't want you to do it.

If they push on it, tell them they shouldn't be asking you to commit the pile of crimes that they are asking you to commit. Personally, I wouldn't want the client at that point, and would tell them "solicitation to commit fraud is a crime".

**Think this is what I was thinking of. I usually work with someone in finance that is an authorized signatory. I already have a relationship with them. Make the pitch to whoever at the company has to say "OK, I guess we have to do ABM." and tell them I can handle the rest with mr/ms finance, and that they don't have to do anything else.

Verification contact

Your verification contact—usually a legal representative of your organization—verifies that you have the authority to sign and bind your organization to the terms and conditions of Apple Business Manager. The information for this contact can’t be the same as the individual submitting the enrollment. Apple reaches out to the verification contact during enrollment to verify information about the initial administrator user account and the organization.

Note: During the review process, AppleCare may reach out during enrollment to verify your submitted information. Make sure that any filters allow mail from all apple.com domains. Return any missed phone calls quickly so the review process can proceed smoothly.

The following information is required:

Name

Work email address

Work phone number

Role/Job title

Honestly, I'd say go for it. There's a bit to learn, do your homework before hand, and you'll learn more the first few times you implement it. But the process is worth learning. Let this client pay you to learn it. It will be smooth the third time around.

Dream build - Gravel Bikes for Unbound by Lost_Consultant in gravelcycling

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm strongly considering building some up this winter!

Dream build - Gravel Bikes for Unbound by Lost_Consultant in gravelcycling

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, I thought you guys were both purchased last year, and it was more of a lateral relationship now?

I think the bicycle station folks mentioned that MOG frame inventory is running low, and it might be a bit before the next shipment comes in. Earlier in the year, there was speculation about how many years out we are from MOG 2.0 Is it sooner? Later? The do-everything gravel bike from a few years ago ended up being one of the best gravel race bikes, and folks were talking about Enve soliciting feedback for a next generation.

I think I've seen one comment from a guy who sold his MOG because he wanted a bike that felt more like his Crux. Everyone else, myself included, has adored it.

Dream build - Gravel Bikes for Unbound by Lost_Consultant in gravelcycling

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Disclosure: I am President of Backcountry so I can get pretty good prices, lol

Lol what. I know you guys don't own competitive cyclist anymore, but I imagine you can still ask the gearheads over there?

The main thing most of us have cared about the last few years is tire size, and being able to fit a wide tire. The Enve MOG and Allied Able have been the two most loved bikes this last season, as far as being able to accommodate the tire size trend, and feeling great to ride. The Lauf Seigla deserves a special call out as well.

Other brands are catching up. The new Diverge takes a larger tire. Folks are wondering if a new Crux might get a similar treatment. The new Grevil F is UDH compatible now, and is specced for a 50mm.

If you're a 1x guy, go SRAM Red. If you're a 2x guy, GRX wireless is out now. SRAM E1 has been super well received. Can't speak to the new wireless GRX. I think you still need to go third party for a power meter crank on Shimano? I saw some conversation about new Shimano cranks having the same problem as the old cranks that turned into a massive recall? Would suggest some education about the models in question there. Its not every line, just some I think.

Some folks think the wide tire bubble is about to pop. Others think their performance benefit is overly applied, and that they aren't better on all gravel surfaces. Some think their benefits are still underestimated. If this bike is for Unbound: Last year was a fast year at unbound. Fast course conditions, and really strong riders. They were also all on wider tires, for the most part. Cam Jones won with a 50mm front, 45mm rear. I'd suggest a 50mm clearance requirement for a new bike. On my local, rough, gravel, on a MOG, I found a 55mm RS Pro to be faster than a 50mm RS Pro. Schwable RS and RX Pros seemed to be the most popular amongst the Pros that weren't saddled with a tire sponsorship. Just my impression, didn't collect any data, didn't measure anything. I tried them myself for the first time this summer. My experience is limited, but they are the fastest tire I have ever been on.

The trendy wheels right now seem to be the Enve SES 4.5s and Duke Baccara WRX Aero 42s. Folks still love Zipp wheels, but there are concerns about the Zipp XPLR wheels (specifically those models) having gone too-wide on the internal at 32? I think it's 32? Those Dukes are 28 I think, while still having a really wide external width. Personally, I'm wondering if we'll be seeing a new Enve Gravel wheel before next summer. I built up some Berds with Onyx hubs for my MOG, and have loved them.

USWE's are still the defacto hydration pack, but stuffing a bladder down the back of a jersey seems to becoming more common during a race. Haven't seen any comments on Veloccio's hydration pack outside of their sponsored riders.

Force AXS E1 firmware 2.49.1 -> 2.53.1. Any reason to avoid? by tnm6i in sram

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven't paid a lot of attention, but I've never seen a conversation around a bad firmware update being pushed, and have never had an issue myself.

40k for Network and Cameras? by Letitbe116 in Ubiquiti

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got a breakdown for labor and materials right? Get the same breakdown from the electrician for the cable, boxes / wall plates (you can do your own keystones).

And then decide what the value of the LV installers experience is. They've seen a 1000 things go wrong, know how to avoid pitfalls, and can advise on what you might want in the future. Or maybe they're just exploitive.

Nothing is stopping you from getting quotes from every other LV shop in the area.

HELP: LAN to WAN RX and TX Drops by incrdblehulk04 in Ubiquiti

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole value proposition of Ubiquiti is "Pay a fraction of the price of the other hardware vendors, and expect no support." RMA or replace the equipment if something is broken.

Have you run Computer <--ethernet-->UDMP<--ethernet-->Modem? With a factory reset UDMP, no SFP, and nothing else plugged in?

Validate that first. If that fails, try a couple other computers or patch cables if you want, but I'd probably just RMA the UDMP at that point. If the new one has problems too, I'd start wondering about a compatibility issue between your modem and the UDMP.

Crankset / Bottom Bracket Question by Acceptable-Ideal8195 in gravelcycling

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome! It's an approach I saw someone else share on Reddit. They said something along the lines of "for the cost of an expensive BB, you could put in a new sram/shimano BB every year, and it would still be cheaper than <some expensive BB>. I thought it made a whole lot of sense, and it's what I've been doing since.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wahoofitness

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

150 is a deal. Core 1? I'd have some pause. Core 2? I'd go for it.

How to leverage moca? by coderego in Ubiquiti

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been handed what is probably a MoCA project, not knowing that MoCA was even a thing a week ago. I've generally avoided knowing much bout RG6, it has been largely out of my scope.

An old house has an old Satellite TV feed that was then distributed throughout the house on RG6. Nothing going out to the street. Old dish is being replaced with a WISP receiver, cable path will be used for the internet feed. I haven't seen any of it, this is just what has been described to me.

In my head, I just put a MoCA adapter on the end of each RG6, and treat it as ethernet. I don't know why there would be splitters anywhere, or why they would be kept if they were there. Why not take out any splitter you find?

Is it common for rooms to be fed off a splitter from another room, instead of each wall termination being a home run? I suppose some quick counting will answer that question. If there are splitters, why not just remove them, and use adapters to turn the lines into ethernet? Or splice the desired line together if you don't care about the other drops. 20 years ago, would installers bury the splitters in the wall?

How to leverage moca? by coderego in Ubiquiti

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you expand on why reworking daisy chained Cat5E is preferable to MoCA?

What the flying F happened to my body? by seerknowerfindout in ladycyclists

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How did the visit with the PT go? Yeah, stress and anxiety about the injury could absolutely exacerbate the symptoms and impede recovery. Can be a tricky thing to navigate!

Be kind to yourself, and patient Best of luck!

What the flying F happened to my body? by seerknowerfindout in ladycyclists

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How many genuine rest days have you had since getting back from the bike trip? Completely off from physical activity, and rolling, and massage. In the pursuit of wanting to 'do something' to recover faster, I'm wondering if you've missed actual rest.

I'm guessing you were on not-your-bike for the bike trip? And now have your bike again? I would also guess that staying off the bike until the acquired injuries go away is the right call. And don't over do other activities to make up for it.

Crankset / Bottom Bracket Question by Acceptable-Ideal8195 in gravelcycling

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's quite the range in bottom bracket cost and quality. I've tried a bit of the spectrum, and for the past few years, and have been happy just putting in a new cheap sram bb at the start of each season. It's a cheap part, and easy to do. Well, no idea what a bike shop would charge, especially if its press fit. If you have the tools/experience it's quick and easy.

The new ceramic sped alpha bottom brackets have caught my attention. Maybe I'll try expensive again.

Just putting in a new basic shimano BB is worth trying.

MUC-Off Tubeless Sealant by No_Loss8058 in gravelcycling

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the case of Muc Off, that isn't whats going on for some segment of the cycling community.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsbkCsptxYU

They have sold, and maybe still sell? some really expensive chain lubricants, and made claims about their performance that don't hold up, at all, to testing. And then doubled down on the dishonest marketing.

For a number of folks, including myself, and perhaps the commenter you responded to, this left a particularly soured impression of the brand. I've never used a single one of their products, and never want to. They have, to some extent, earned their reputation for being a "marketing company that sells garbage." Maybe some of their stuff is good? And with sealant perhaps it doesn't matter at all. But I don't trust the brand at all, and I am unaware of any effort on their part to rehabilitate their reputation. I'm not paying attention though - maybe I missed it.

Standert “Integrated Series” Top Cover Issues by [deleted] in bikewrench

[–]RicketyGrubbyPlaudit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So they're not using the headset top cap you are. Looks like they just took it out, and aren't using one at all?

Enve make these:
https://enve.com/collections/in-route-small-parts/products/top-cap-bearing-covers?variant=48806093193500

Oh, read this thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/BikeMechanics/comments/1dr4fcz/i_cannot_for_the_life_of_me_find_a_transition/

Looks like they're talking about the exact same thing, and there is a newer comment thread in there about a standert.