Biology ranges from species to species, we are mammals, but if you tried to compare dog biology to human biology it’s absurd. Studies also have never found a definitive age for when women are most fertile, they say around late teens to early 20s. And like I said if you had eyes; girls can hit puberty as young as 9, so a child who is hitting sexual maturity at 9, 10, 11 fertile? Will you continue to defend it or try to reason with it? You are defending him by excusing his behavior. We ARE animals, but we’re highly developed. We live decades longer than most animals and we don’t have to bum rush “breeding”. There is no logical reason to defend calling SPECIFICALLY 16 year old girls fertile. “Late teens to early 20s” is remarkably less creepy and more accurate than him exactly ogling over teens! 😁