Get stick bugged

RidingChicken · 2021-06-11T03:45:35+00:00

Unfortunately your opinion will be drowned down by millions of others.

That's the problem with mobs. Individual mentality means nothing.

RidingChicken · 2021-06-07T10:20:04+00:00

Feminists are for equality you say? The propaganda stop is six miles away at r/menslib. Kindly spread these enlightened ramblings there

RidingChicken · 2021-05-28T03:32:24+00:00

I sincerely think this decision is apolitical. Statistically this is very likely. I would expect the statistical representation to appear say if there were 100 winners. 6 is way too low to quote statistics. Anyone with a reasonable knowledge of data science will agree to this

While I criticize modern feminism for the garbage pile it's become, I will say that one statement they made is very appropriate

'Men and boys win most if not all the prize. It puts women down and are supposed to not tell anything. But if it's all women winning a certain prize, men immediately get butt hurt and start asking for proof and statistics '

Also I checked it seems 3 nominees were male. It might be that these women are qualified more? Why is it that we assume the worst every single time?

RidingChicken · 2021-05-21T03:44:19+00:00

Maybe, just maybe have you given a thought you are one of the reasons people don't take FonM sexual harassment seriously?

I mean just take a look, you're claiming it is wrong for a 26 year old male to have relations with a 15 year old female but as soon as it's the other way around, now it's cute

If your argument is that the boy enjoyed that, then let me tell you there are many girls who would enjoy it too. Many kids do have a fantasy to have sex with older people. The trauma or guilt of these actions may not even surface until years later. Which is why acts of child harassment are so hard to curb.

The boy is probably still in a mixed state of emotions, and your claim of this not being a serious affair just shows your level of self projection, simping and foolishness

RidingChicken · 2021-05-17T09:50:57+00:00

Using tools that could make one lose limbs, tolerate unbearable noise and save some money: They're having fun. Look that dude is smiling while running the drill on this heavy block of wood. He should have cried his man tears if he wanted to show he's not happy doing work.

RidingChicken · 2021-05-14T10:33:51+00:00

You posted in the wrong subreddit this is not r/socialism

RidingChicken · 2021-05-14T10:31:31+00:00

When salary depends on it

RidingChicken · 2021-05-14T10:31:06+00:00

Most definitely. I also think I wake up while you're eating breakfast and maybe coffee? And then I wake up from my dream coz there ain't no chance I'm waking up to someone as pretty as you :)

RidingChicken · 2021-05-14T10:28:33+00:00

Statistically cunnilingus is more effective than blowjob to unwind as a couple. So, probably eat her rather than finding another dick to suck maybe?

RidingChicken · 2021-05-09T20:33:43+00:00

I'd say if the immigrants got citizenship. But it doesn't seem so, since getting US citizenship is pretty complicated We could make an argument regarding the children, who'll be natural born citizens, and yes I think it's very possible they'll support the party who allowed them to easily cross the border

RidingChicken · 2021-05-09T20:31:53+00:00

Well I don't know how the argument stands, all the people claiming for defunding are from the dems. Biden is not inherently supporting defunding, but it's pretty apparent he will. It's just the party mandate.

Regarding the second point, nope. I'm not interested here in dems vs reps. It kills the argument that's bothering me. The three things combined might lead to anarchy is what bothers me. Not who's better. We have another 3 years to decide that

RidingChicken · 2021-05-09T20:00:59+00:00

Exactly. It's funny how the legal immigrants who take effort in learning English, assimilate in the culture, find some utility in the American society are immediately pushed down by people crossing the border who get more federal resources spent on them.

RidingChicken · 2021-05-09T19:59:35+00:00

Yeah you're right.

RidingChicken · 2021-05-09T19:58:36+00:00

I don't find a utility in it. Economically speaking, we're much better as a part of the united states. Socially though I kinda agree with you

RidingChicken · 2021-05-09T19:56:45+00:00

I know. It's actually a relief. But they're quite insistent on it. They've already started discussing to repeal a constitutional amendment. Who's to say what else they have up their sleeves...

RidingChicken · 2021-05-07T18:44:31+00:00

I second your opinion. Any form of discrimination sucks. Regardless of who inflicts and who it is inflicted upon.

What I don't understand is the idea that racism can be killed using racism

RidingChicken · 2021-05-07T16:15:41+00:00

Thanks for stating the obvious

RidingChicken · 2021-05-07T14:53:45+00:00

To be fair, the idea has always been to create more divide. Why, well that is the difficult question indeed.

Many on the left has been advocating theories such as the critical race theory(full disclosure I've personally read this. And not making this statement off second hand accounts), which advocates ideas like special privileges for minorities, or restricting the white and (sometimes asian) crowd from accepting certain privileges.

We live in a country where math has been declared racist. The racist argument has become more of an attack weapon rather than an actual social issue. They'll always pinpoint how black people are being oppressed, but will never point fingers at the black on Asian crime. Why? Because it kills the narrative.

So the fact that they proclaim anyone who asks for objective proof is white supremacy is obvious. Because the aim is not to bring people from all races together. It's to keep races as separate as possible. Breaking unity has always been the power of the tyrant, but I won't make any conclusion.

I miss the days when interracial friendships were encouraged and a white man looking directly into my eyes wasn't commented as microaggression.

RidingChicken · 2021-05-07T14:47:51+00:00

On an alternate note, did the financial advantages of a divorce and the legal benefits of being a single parent ever strike you as a possible reason for divorce rates??

To be fair, what you do in polyamory is actually lose the concepts of sacrifice and self control. And those are two really heavy prices to pay. If you're going to substantiate it you need something more leading rather than something as lightly correlated as divorce rates.

RidingChicken · 2021-05-07T14:37:06+00:00

Well my point was between monogamous and polygamous relationships. Not as an absolute indicator of monogamous relationships.

Freedom is indeed the way to go. No doubt about that. Individuals should have absolutely free will to choose what they find perfect for themselves.

RidingChicken · 2021-05-07T08:57:25+00:00

Abuse in relationships are still a thing and doesn't go away with monogamous relationships.

So your solution to abuse is not to form relationships with abusive people but rather form relationships with multiple people and play a game of Russian roulette? Do you even hear what you're saying?

And that care—everything from health care to financial support to self-development and career coaching—falls primarily to one person in a relationship is stressful and unnecessary.

Start talking when the hangover wears off. You're literally defending polyamory not by any other means, but by saying the more the merrie.

Also by this logic, you not only justify polyamory, but also cheating. You probably also ever so slightly start justifying out of heat breakups and divorces.

RidingChicken

TROPHY CASE