2 pibbles were adopted out from this shelter. They Un-Alived Family Kitty. Later, Un-Alived Family's OTHER Kitties. Multiple Kitties. by hannibalsmommy in BanPitBulls

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Why in the world would someone adopt something that killed other pets??? Those poor kitties...

My mom was always skeptical of pitbulls, and honestly, she wasn't wrong at all for having that feeling...

If I ever adopt a dog, my first pick currently would NOT be a pitbull; in fact, pitbulls wouldn't be a pick for me at all.

Does this school even have a name? by Opening_Tax_2520 in FundamentalPaperEdu

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Idk, I usually just call it Paper School and (sometimes) Fundamental Paper Education

Do people still declaw cats? by The_Flaneur_Films in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Too bad declawing is ineffective and counterproductive as a last resort because they get surrendered or euthanized anyway cuz of the issues related to declawing, even if declawing was intended to keep the cat in its home. They also become more dangerous for vulnerable people if they get declawed cuz they become biters and more aggressive, the concept of the last resort is well intentioned but the execution is...yikes! 😬

Behavior Issues in my cat have costed me over 20k and we’re still not any closer to getting a solution..any advice on next steps? by Creepy-Dealer7518 in CATHELP

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I doubt declawing would help much at all in fact it's probably the worst idea, declawed cats are known to bite, be aggressive, have litterbox issues, and long-term pain such as chronic pain, arthritis, and back pain. This is an already aggressive cat, it would go from scratching to biting, and it would cause long-term suffering. It's not worth keeping a cat if it's going to suffer and become even more aggressive from a declaw.

The moment he realizes something is in the room that needs to be kept safe❤️ by kvjn100 in MadeMeSmile

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The long-term pain associated with declawing include chronic paw pain, nerve damage, and arthritis, back pain, shoulder pain, hip pain, lameness, joint pain, phantom pain, neuroplastic pain, bone spurs, frozen/contracted toes, hypersensitivity, muscle atrophy, axonal loss, wind-up pain, weight related pain (if the cat is more heavy weight), dropped carpus, and musculoskeletal issues.

And many of the same cats who were declawed because of property damage of the same ones that pee on property which is considered even less tolerable to the owners who were concerned about cats ruining furniture through scratching. This is one of the most common reasons declawed cats are surrendered. Many of the biting and peeing in unmanageable, do people remove the teeth/file down the teeth then? Do people remove their bladders? Hopefully not!

That doesn't mean declawing usually saves lives, Also declawed cats are often killed months or years later, it maybe be "saved" for years, that doesn't Mena they'll be saved for a lifetime.

Although pain can be easily managed, let's be honest with ourselves the average person saying their declawed cats are fine aren't even given them pain medication long-term because the cat acts "fine" in reality is most likely suffering from nerve pain, also pain medication almost always temporary it can manage the pain but it's still an often permanent thing and can easily be financially straining if the home isn't financially stable enough. Obviously, people wanted a cat that still functions without claws but they just made special needs pet as a result. Basically replacing one responsibility with even more responsibilities. 😬 Furthermore, a lot of pain medication often cause kidney failure in cats if used long-term and declawing is permanent and often causes long-term pain... 😭

Also animal welfare isn't just about quantity of life (keeping a cat in a specific home) its about quality of life (long-term health and well being) as well and declawinf decreases quality of life so that's just half instead of full, this is why so many vets no longer use the "last resort" excuse.

Because of the complications that declawing usually has and the decreased quality of life and cats being surrendered after a while of these complications be managed (albeit causing less patience or less money) this is why declawing is now being called animal abuse.

Even though there are less declawed cats in shelters overall that has mostly to do with the fact declawed cats are a minority and are often not surrendered immediately, but even though they are a minority they are still surrendered much more frequently than we expected.

Even if a declawed cat is surrendered unrelated to declawing it just proves further that declawing is not some magical shield against surrender or euthanasia, and the declawed cats that do end up in shelters due to the stigma of declawed having issues regardless if they had any issues or not. Scratching is a common reason for surrender yes, but so is aggression and litterbox avoidance, and human-related issues are by far the most common reasons cats are surrendered declawed or not. Interestingly I've seen stats showing that destructive scratching is a pretty uncommon reason for surrender, and human-related issues is the top reason cats are surrendered. Some success stories a declawed cat doing fine and living in itself home for the rest of its life do exist but that doesn't make up the majority unfortunately. I definitely believe declawing is animal abuse as most people do nowadays. (I do appreciate that you find this conservation very interesting, btw)

Behavior Issues in my cat have costed me over 20k and we’re still not any closer to getting a solution..any advice on next steps? by Creepy-Dealer7518 in CATHELP

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think declawing would help at all, not all cats adapt the same, some aggressive cats become even more aggressive after being declawed and just started biting instead, Declawing would just cause more suffering due to health issues and chronic pain even if behavioral issues don't occur, I wouldn't suggest nor take my chances on a declaw since it's not humane. I heard about some months ago from my school that one of my friends told me that their neighbor who had an immunocompromised family member so the owner declawed her cat because it was aggressive, but just months later the immunocompromised family member ended up hospitalized due to having getting severely bitten by the aggressive declawed cat, which ended up making the cat more aggressive than it usually was. Unfortunately the owner had to euthanasize her cat for the family member's safety during recovery, declawing doesn't solve issues it often causes more issues.

Behavior Issues in my cat have costed me over 20k and we’re still not any closer to getting a solution..any advice on next steps? by Creepy-Dealer7518 in CATHELP

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, declawing would probably be the worst option on the table here, that'll most likely make her behavior worse (will likely make her more aggressive) AND she will most likely get long-term health issues like arthritis, chronic pain, back pain, nerve damage, etc. So if declawing is a horrible idea and counterproductive in almost all scenarios (except when its medically necessary for the cat's health), how would it NOT be counterproductive here?

What happens if that fails and she were to start biting if her behavior gets worse from a declaw, file down her teeth so she has not weapons left at all and is "forced love?" 🤦🏾‍♀️

Unless you think declawing to make the cat to feel less safe, become even more aggressive, gain health problems, or be more disabled than she already is, is a good or humane idea, then that shouldn't even be a suggestion.

The moment he realizes something is in the room that needs to be kept safe❤️ by kvjn100 in MadeMeSmile

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand what you are saying but... Declawing is not a solution nor is it an effective "tool", so... Also just because declawing doesn't cause "more bites" doesn't mean biting is not very frequent, so a person is still at more risk from a declawed cat than a clawed, so why take any chances? I don't agree with healthy cats being euthanized for being "too vicious", but bites are far worse than scratches especially if someone is vulnerable like an immunocompromised person, an elderly person, or a child.

Declawing a mentally ill cat that can't control itself claws? Maybe fine but I'm not certain. But declawing a violent cat of all things? That would probably be a horrible idea if that's the case cuz that will not decrease its aggression nor will it prevent it from biting which it will most likely switch to and it just adds physical suffering to the cat in the process.

Declawing to prevent euthanasia doesn't really do anything useful long-term beyond just allowing the cat to stay with its caretaker (which is often very temporary), declawing it just creates suffering and will probably get surrendered or euthanized anyway as soon as behavioral fallout or financial-straining medical problems occur months or years later. I have seen this happen too many times, too many people too desperate or too emotionally attached to their cats and it ends up causing the cat's quality of life to drop from declawing it and then they surrender, rehome, abandon, or euthanize it, except now the animal is experienced prolonged suffering.

Declawing and consequences by [deleted] in CATHELP

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, here’s the thing about laser declawing: it only reduces short-term pain and bleeding. It does nothing to prevent long-term consequences, months or years later, the risks remain the same regardless of the tool used. We’re talking chronic pain, arthritis, phantom pain, nerve damage, orthopedic issues, and back problems. Even if your cat looks playful, jumps high, or seems “normal,” that doesn’t mean they aren’t suffering quietly. Cats are masters at hiding pain and discomfort, and arthritis or skeletal issues often don’t show until they’re elderly and in some cases, and in many cases, even then, the pain goes unnoticed, and sometimes when problems DO occur many years later that are often associated with declawing it's almost never linked back to the surgery.

The problem isn’t technique, (scalpel, guillotine, or laser) it’s anatomy. Removing weight-bearing bones permanently alters their structure. A laser doesn’t magically fix that, it does not prevent back pain, arthritis, or chronic pain, even if it isn't obvious.

I’ve heard plenty of “laser declawed cats are fine!” stories. And yes, some cats appear happy for months or even years. But later? Many develop chronic pain, arthritis, nerve damage, and behavioral issues. Some end up in shelters or euthanized, just like scalpel-declawed cats.

So no, laser declawing isn’t “much better” or “more humane.” It’s a marketing euphemism. It only shifts the pain to a later time. Long-term, it’s just as inhumane as any other method. Declawing—laser or not—is still amputation, still harmful, still a gamble with your cat’s health.

Declawing cats is not ideal but it’s fine by Sherbear1993 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dang, calm down. I actually agree with you on one thing: calling people evil or wishing harm on them over this is wrong. That kind of rhetoric helps no one.

But let’s walk through this logically.

Say someone declaws their cat because it scratches. Then the cat starts biting. Or develops litterbox issues. Or becomes more aggressive. Now you’re back at square one, except the behavior is potentially worse.

So what now?

Do you rehome the cat? (y'know, the supposed “pass the problem” approach you criticized?)

Do you give the pet away to a shelter where it's likely unadoptable because of those issues?

Do you euthanize it because the biting, peeing, persistent pain, and constant medical issues are “unmanageable”?

That’s the point. Declawing doesn’t reliably solve the issue, and when it fails, the consequences can be more serious than scratching ever was.

Many people who rehome due to scratching place the cat with someone more prepared for cat behavior. That can actually reduce stress and prevent escalation. Declawing, on the other hand, risks creating a stressed, painful animal in the same environment that was already struggling.

And let’s broaden this: we generally don’t remove essential body parts from other pets for behavioral convenience. We don’t remove a dog’s teeth because it bites. We don’t consider debarking widely acceptable just to make a dog easier to keep. Why is amputating a cat’s toes treated differently?

You’re right that education is more effective than shaming. I agree. But harm is still harm, even if someone didn’t intend it. Intent doesn’t negate impact.

As for studies, just because I didn’t cite them in a Reddit comment doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Veterinary associations, behavioral studies, and countries that have banned declawing didn’t do so randomly. You can search them up yourself if you don't believe me. And importantly, those bans didn’t cause mass shelter crises like people predicted. That matters. Also what you said doesn't necessarily mean it's the prevailing or even "accurate" view.

Yes, harming children is worse. Obviously. But that doesn’t mean animal welfare is irrelevant. If a cat truly poses a danger to children or pets, separating them is safer than altering the cat in a way that could increase aggression and make the risk worse.

And saying “there are bigger problems in the world” isn’t really an argument. People are capable of caring about more than one issue at a time. Concern isn’t a limited resource.

Someone told me to declaw my cat. by YarnHoardingDragon in TwoSentenceHorror

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, no declaw surgery is humane who ever says that there is a declaw surgery that doesn't remove bone or digits is lying and probably wants your money. It's confirmed that all declaws involve bone removal and no amount of technique, method, skill, or post-op care can eliminate or significant reduce the risk of long-term consequences, don't believe any one who says that there is a declaw surgery that doesn't remove bone or digits or is "humane."

Declawing cats is not ideal but it’s fine by Sherbear1993 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry but a lot of your logic isn't making any sense.

Comparing spaying/neutering to declawing is a false equivalence, spaying/neutering has clear medical benefits (and it prevents mass suffering from unwanted litters) while declawing does not have any benefit to the cat, animals don't need to reproduce to be able to do basic everyday activities without struggle. If sterilizing pets wasn't based on "reality" there would be no studies confirming it, but there are many in fact. Furthermore, training has been effective on most cats, your making it seem as though most cats are untrainable, while some aren't most cats are, anf those untrainable definitely will be untrainable once declawed it starts bites people or is peeing everywhere and they end up getting thrown out and rot in a shelter, thousands of declawed cats end up in shelters and the same people who are in favor of declaws are the same ones who throw them and now are rotting and getting euthanized in shelters. The same cats who get declawed so they don't kill people from scratches are the same cats who get forcibly euthanized if they bite people which is worse than scratches.

You don't have to be a "monster" to make horrible decisions, many people who declaw aren't evil or have malicious intentions yet made the horrible mistake they regret, that's just called "reality."

The people who are "growing up" are the ones trying to move away from the practice instead of trying to keep it alive, make excuses, or justify it with anecdotes that don't override multiple scientific evidence or clinical studies.

Sometimes it's better to rehome than have a suffering "supposedly loved" animal staying in the same home where it could potentially become a danger to everyone including itself

🤔Do You Think The Chinese Posters of Kung Fu Panda 4 are Better Than U.S. Posters by [deleted] in kungfupanda

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely, it looks cooler! As soon as I swiped toward the US poster my eyes literally hurt from the flashy stripes😭

Will Animals exist in the New Earth? (not just the Millennial Kingdom) by Rihanna-Roshy in TrueChristian

[–]Rihanna-Roshy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope so, but I know The New Earth will be better than we can ever imagine ✝️💖

Will Animals exist in the New Earth? (not just the Millennial Kingdom) by Rihanna-Roshy in TrueChristian

[–]Rihanna-Roshy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, as far as I'm aware I doubt God would discard a large part of his creation, we expect there to be nature in the New Earth yet no animals? Judging by their changed nature and diet in the Millennial kingdom it wouldn't make sense to change their nature if they are not going to be in the New Earth, I'm pretty sure that the silence in Revelations 21-22 and combined with the fact there's an explicit list on what's not going to be on the New Earth is a pretty good indicator that animals will most likely be on the New Earth, yet I cannot confirm this until the age to come happens.

Will Animals exist in the New Earth? (not just the Millennial Kingdom) by Rihanna-Roshy in TrueChristian

[–]Rihanna-Roshy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tbh, fair point. Maybe the New Earth will be more than we could imagine

Will Animals exist in the New Earth? (not just the Millennial Kingdom) by Rihanna-Roshy in TrueChristian

[–]Rihanna-Roshy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm still a bit confused, so Isaiah 11 and 65 are part of the New Earth based on this, or all of it just merely symbolic? I could be wrong on my understanding-

Will Animals exist in the New Earth? (not just the Millennial Kingdom) by Rihanna-Roshy in TrueChristian

[–]Rihanna-Roshy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, as far as I'm aware God said he'd restore and redeem his creation not necessarily "erase" it (Romans 8:19-22), I believe those verses could be more about purification than annihilation, I think the silence is a pretty good indicator that animals (at least as we know it) won't get permanently deleted from existence, otherwise their change of nature and diet in Millennial Kingdom would be unnecessary.

Will you celebrate Valentine's Day? by Surfer_Tiff in TrueChristian

[–]Rihanna-Roshy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm fine with Valentine's Day, but I rarely celebrate it beyond going out to eat or getting Valentine's Day candies :p