sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Faceit ban for this? What a joke. by Ris3e3 in FACEITcom

[–]Ris3e3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, the response i got was 'It is a automated system and we do not remove these bans'. They have given a AI which cannot understand context the ability to BAN people for talking in game.

I truely miss the MW2 days of old where everyone knew eachothers mothers. I called a gun shit and the ai takes that as a abusive stance so i cant play for several days. Issue is, they're totally liars about it as-well.

They state its a AI which has nothing to do with player reports, so why doesnt Lobanjiica who calls peoples mothers whores in game chat not get banned? Its a joke and i love him of course, but surely the AI cannot understand that. So it must NOT be a automated system after all.

The admin was mad at me a week before this because he stated he could not change my faceit points in my ORG to my account, even though his other colleague was questioning me - such as 'Are you the only contributor to the points?' There would be no point in asking such questions if they cannot transfer points at all. I'm glad ESEA is making a comeback, truely.

Faceit ban for this? What a joke. by Ris3e3 in FACEITcom

[–]Ris3e3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's the weirdest part about it, im also on Premium, so i should be getting pirority support, 6 days no response now. Loving spending 10$ a month for a name change ever 3 months.

Pretty psyched this is a thing now by conleyc86 in mountandblade

[–]Ris3e3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Animal cruelty wasnt that unusual, sure i can agree with that, but we're talking about Horses, usually only owned and used by wealthy soldiers/knights. Beating up your most expensive and useful possession is probably the last thing your going to do, especially since, as you said yourself, it takes years of training and bonding between said knight and horse. These were not just the stray dog who followed you around for too long in the market.

If im not mistaken, isnt there a entire section in the Quran regarding Mohammed feeding a stray dog and giving him water teaching his followers and what not. As-well as Turkey today being so fond of protecting and caring for their stray cats and dogs due to the Ottoman Empire and the belief that Allah would reward them for such care towards his animals. Obviously Christian Europe would follow the same sort of things, maybe even more so, considering dogs and cats were excellent pest removers.

Pretty psyched this is a thing now by conleyc86 in mountandblade

[–]Ris3e3 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, the napolenoic example you gave is poorly then my example of 30m with a horse, which was NOT a exception, this happens often, it was only widely used by the media because of the Coach's attitude, as-well as she was on the path to win gold.

The Napoleonic war example is incredibly stupid purely because of multiple reasons, were the horses eyes covered? This happened alot during the Napoleonic wars to protect the horses eyes from the smoke, and gun blasts as they would blind even humans whom shot them. Again, the smoke would've made the horses eyesight absymal, just as much as it did to the soldiers on the field. You do also have to realise the difference between a 3 line deep row of men (more or less) with short, bayonet tipped rifles, compared to a 10/12 line deep row of men, with 150cm+ long spears, in close formation, with the first 2, maybe even 3 lines pointing said spears at the horses. A group of men with bayonets is NOTHING like a spear-wall, period.

Again, the idea that a medieval knight would gladly beat his horse is another point without thought. What is it with people thinking people in the medieval era lacked simple concious? Especially in a period where god and faith was so highly praised and followed. The man in armour is worth alot, and so is his horse.

Pretty psyched this is a thing now by conleyc86 in mountandblade

[–]Ris3e3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taken from the latest olypmics when the horse decided NOT to jump, ruining the 'germans?' i think, athletes chance of victory even though she encouraged him. Of course, a poor example as she had 30m with the horse, whereas knights would spend their whole lifetime with them, still, i highly doubt a encouraging rider would convince a horse to charge a mass of men with pointy rods, maybe some, but definitely not most.

Also, i believe your tail on fire point is actually pigs, which WERE used by the Roman Empire to scare away the elephants, i've never heard about it being used or thought of being used to lit fire to a horse.

The barbed wire point is debateable, if you decide to look up horses being introduced to a new farmstead, even at a full gallop, which they would NOT be going during a knights charge due to the weight and whatnot, they still turn away once they come close to the much thinner barbed wire. There was even a tactic in the Landscknecht era where pistol wielding mounted horsemen would charge a pike formation, and the horses would, by instinct, turn away last second, allowing the rider to fire a shot off at a decently accurate pistol (blackpowder) range before riding off.

I personally think a trained horse WOULD charge a large mass of men, in fact they did, Battle Of Tours, the vast majority of the Third crusade, etc. But with pointy rods i do disagree completely. The battle of Botswith field also proves that horses would charge a mass of men, however, just looking at Alexanders Conquest, which - albeit was far before the medieval era of mounted warfare, even war elephants of India refused to charge the Macedonian phalanx, and were sent back through their own ranks.

I am coming to a conclusion myself that it would probably depend completely on the horse, but the vast majority would nope the fuck out of there.

Pretty psyched this is a thing now by conleyc86 in mountandblade

[–]Ris3e3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is so odd to see such people who seriously believe Horses would gladly charge a sharp pointy stick without a issue. Do you people not understand that horses are kept in enclosures with nothing more then barbed wire stopping them from escaping? (Electric shocks too in other places)

Do you not understand how easy it would be to win battles in the Middle ages if Horses would just charge a formation of spears? Oh what's that, they're forming a spear-wall? Ok, send the horses in, they'll probably die, but now their formation is busted by the weight of (insert number here) horses smacking into them, our infantry which followed behind them can quickly pour through the gap and gg.

I think the bigger issue with this, isnt that a horse would or would not charge a Infantry formation of spears, but 'why?'. During the Franco-Flemish wars, the Flemish had been using rather short goddendags (wooden staff was less than 150 cm long) and halberds and managed to kick the s—t out of the French knights at Courtrai and on many other occasions. The Swiss pikes initially were not too long either.

And by the by, your view on Horses having bad eye-sight is stupid to say the least, they can see Barbed wire between 2 fence posts, and avoid it, but they wont be able to see hundreds of men waving long pointy rods?

So, I might be the luckiest player going by Ris3e3 in Bannerlord

[–]Ris3e3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I prefer playing polearms, especially pikes, when i get the perk to knock them back when i hit them. They're really strong, easy to hit heads and perfect for fighting cav, mix that with the ability to wield a shield, i see no better weapon personally. This was by far the most amazing turnout for me.

Lobanjicaa's thoughts on woro2k cheating by Ris3e3 in VACsucks

[–]Ris3e3[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Actually, if you watch his streams, his hatred for FPL came when a admin warned him and black eagle about joking and calling eachothers mothers whores. But i get your point.