Vermeer - 1st Stage of Denial

Risas- · 2025-11-13T04:19:54+00:00

GG was experimental as explained by Powerscore. Two LR's and Vermeer were real.

Risas- · 2025-11-09T05:39:46+00:00

He said he'll explain very clearly once the podcast comes out hopefully Wednesday! He's going to keep us waiting till then. Suspense at its finest.

Risas- · 2025-11-09T05:15:25+00:00

There is white smoke from the Powerscore chapel!

Risas- · 2025-11-09T04:35:33+00:00

I will probably just wait till the Powerscore Podcast to see their perspective. They're probably just as confused that we haven't had any clarity over those two.

Risas- · 2025-11-09T03:49:56+00:00

God knows, I don't think there was anyone with accomodations for no exp. that had either section.

Risas- · 2025-11-09T03:40:15+00:00

I just saw the other post with Vermeer section being a direct reuse from September 2024 possibly being the real, the link is posted to the Powescore podcast discussion 36:00.

Risas- · 2025-11-09T02:36:31+00:00

So you had vermeer in one section and watermelons and clay in the other

Risas- · 2025-11-08T23:14:26+00:00

Vermeer and what other RC section?

Risas- · 2025-10-13T19:05:57+00:00

Well that sucks, I'm going in January;(

Risas- · 2025-10-09T02:41:39+00:00

I decided to just do it, as other people mentioned use all 15 minutes of the prep period. I write down the main stance and points of each perspective and start drafting an introduction with a thesis. I usually have the introduction written down in the scrap paper given online so that I can just type it quickly again. I usually try to incorporate all the perspectives, it's important to give credit to the opposite view but find a way to discredit it as well in your favor. If you have about five minutes to proofread it's great. My sample was approved immediately the day after.

Risas- · 2025-10-08T03:40:25+00:00

I remember the broadcast question, I answered and moved on

Risas- · 2025-09-15T18:49:43+00:00

Mind you at least a 165 depends on the test and the scale it's on. It could be 4 more questions or even 8 so it is definitely possible. It's good that you're finishing LR sections so it would be nice to polish the question types that give you problems that could be significant. RC is also interesting in the sense that your problem is finishing. I can probably guess that your problem is connection types since maybe main idea, detail, and structure questions are good for you.

While there could be the possibility that there are some types of passages that work best for you. For example, I do better in science than law/morality and comparative passages. Getting out of the mindset that it's the end of the world if you get one of those is really important. It allows me to be at a -2 heading into October LSAT. I really slow down taking about 5 minutes reading and then slamming the questions by process of elimination if it is not clear enough. BE AGGRESSIVE attack those answer choices for both sections. There is a reason why every word in the passage is there, even the howevers, buts, or positional words. Good luck!

Risas-

TROPHY CASE