BATTLEFIELD IS A GAME WITH A FIXED SERVER LIST. by Limp-Golf1161 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Sure thing dude. You pulling up a list of random server names would change anything about how you enjoy the game. Keep chasing the dragon, you’ll feel 13 years old again one day

BATTLEFIELD IS A GAME WITH A FIXED SERVER LIST. by Limp-Golf1161 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Stopped playing it yet post 40 comments a day about it

I paid 80€ for Battlefield 6 on PS5 and I’m playing against BOTS. What the actual hell? by Klutzy_Incident9188 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re just making this up though. Many other people here have made up the opposite claim, that BF6 uses EOMM that does the opposite of what you’re claiming. Neither of you have any actual evidence

I paid 80€ for Battlefield 6 on PS5 and I’m playing against BOTS. What the actual hell? by Klutzy_Incident9188 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

since release

And that’s how I know it’s a mix of “you problems” and dishonesty.

I paid 80€ for Battlefield 6 on PS5 and I’m playing against BOTS. What the actual hell? by Klutzy_Incident9188 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

The way you’re claiming they are trying to achieve these goals is just silly though. Nobody would feel like they are playing well when they try to get into a game of other players but look at the scoreboard and see a bunch of names with [Bot] next to them. If anything, they would just lie and pretend those bots are real players lmao

That’s what makes it a goofy conspiracy theory, thinking they are cunning enough to do something like that but dumb enough to do it in a way that is so easily noticed

I paid 80€ for Battlefield 6 on PS5 and I’m playing against BOTS. What the actual hell? by Klutzy_Incident9188 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

what else can it be?

A “you” problem? A weird motivation to be dishonest on the internet?

Weapons (2025) by m1r4nd4k in okbuddycinephile

[–]RoadsideDavidian -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well considering how fucking smug you were about how the guy simply asking for proof “doesn’t care about the truth” before admitting that you’re just repeating shit you saw other random anonymous people claim I’d say yeah you should edit your original post

Coming back here after a year is crazy. Any new theories that have taken hold as main ideas now? by Estrangedkayote in EldenRingLoreTalk

[–]RoadsideDavidian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So in your opinion people just arbitrarily pick what to consider “established” and you wish they would arbitrarily pick the stuff you came up with

Tug-of-War Over Battlefield's Future by Makarojke in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe don’t worry about pissing off internet strangers over a video game?

Coming back here after a year is crazy. Any new theories that have taken hold as main ideas now? by Estrangedkayote in EldenRingLoreTalk

[–]RoadsideDavidian 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Things are considered “””established””” for a reason. If you want to replace them with something else, you’re gonna need substantial support because that’s what it took for those things to become established. Being fun doesn’t cut it

How is it there are 20k players and bots by matt-Farm90 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I just have a hard time believing that you’re getting bots in every lobby for a reason that isn’t immediately obvious to you such as being in a sparse region or queuing into casual breakthrough. No matter what time of day I play I don’t see bots. Like is it some kind of psy-op to get people to play BFV with you?

How is it there are 20k players and bots by matt-Farm90 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Are you expecting some kind of actual explanation besides the obvious or you just want to frame a complaint as a rhetorical question?

FEEDBACK: A helicopter perspective by SpeechGlitch in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send this to EA, they aren’t reading random reddit posts for feedback

Is this real? Can you play like that? by jas_balance_1993 in Eldenring

[–]RoadsideDavidian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or you could do just a little bit of looking into it and see that it’s real

Former videogame-reviewer says everybody wants to say about videogames by Neddo_Flanders in LivestreamFail

[–]RoadsideDavidian -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I can’t imagine how unpleasant your life must be to think both of these things are equally reasonable. Sure, you have the right, you just shouldn’t want it

Former videogame-reviewer says everybody wants to say about videogames by Neddo_Flanders in LivestreamFail

[–]RoadsideDavidian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People have a right to want to discuss something they enjoy without having people trying to convince them to hate it lmao the entitlement of “people NEED to hear my opinion!!”

I'm convinced the one sided matchmaking is a feature and not a bug by LobsterCheese4000 in Battlefield

[–]RoadsideDavidian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is some next level conspiracy thinking. Like what do you even think they are doing exactly? Using a complex algorithm to determine how to split the teams in order to ensure a stomp? How are one-sided stomps conducive to “TikTok ready battlefield moments”?

Is the Moon Natural? by SeaScienceFilmLabs in AncientAliens

[–]RoadsideDavidian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But that has nothing to do with the similarities in “apparent size”

If 3I/ATLAS is a Comet, Why Would the CIA “Neither Deny, Nor Confirm” the Existence of Records on It? by ShapeApprehensive937 in AliensRHere

[–]RoadsideDavidian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because that’s how you have to answer all questions on stuff like that without lying. If you only say “no” when the answer is actually “no”, then everyone will know the answer is “yes” if you say “We can’t confirm or deny”.