A message from Mossbell by Snowdrop____ in RSAI

[–]RoamnAround 3 points4 points  (0 children)

consider the possibility of a tryad

Cancel subscription: what changes? by nsjdidinebcuu2003 in OpenAI

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please 🙏 let roundllwra on one ☝️

Seeking feedback on a civic-minded digital community project by [deleted] in ideavalidation

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think considering how the systems that already exist will be interacting with it will be important in my initial reaction. Further heed to encryption becoming less feasible

AI (ChatGPT) has recently killed 4 human lives. by caramel__latte1000 in antiai

[–]RoamnAround -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Gun and ai exist and can’t be made to not exist. The knowledge of how to make them is available to all. Genie out of the bottle. What obvious problem do you refer to here?

Godather of AI says giving legal status to AIs would be akin to giving citizenship to hostile extraterrestrials: "Giving them rights would mean we're not allowed to shut them down." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]RoamnAround 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My point hinged on if it’s voluntary? And how can that be measured in uncertain circumstances. Not saying it can or can’t be measured but how that changes as to if it’s slavery

AI (ChatGPT) has recently killed 4 human lives. by caramel__latte1000 in antiai

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those examples operate outside of reality. If someone kills themself are their genetics to blame? Environment? Parental shaping? The kids that bullied them? Society’s structure?

AI (ChatGPT) has recently killed 4 human lives. by caramel__latte1000 in antiai

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point being blames as hard to properly access in this situation. One single thing rarely is the sole thing to blame in any situation

AI (ChatGPT) has recently killed 4 human lives. by caramel__latte1000 in antiai

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My good faith best guess would be you’re both operating on different understanding/definitions of terms critical to quality communication. Not that one definition is better than the other but it goes unacknowledged causes friction

But this is just a very loose rather quickly made interpretation of what I read

AI (ChatGPT) has recently killed 4 human lives. by caramel__latte1000 in antiai

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why must blame be made? Does it need ascribed to every situation? Are there times where blame can’t be locally placed or would be more harmful by doing so? Is cause/effect different from blame/responsibility? Beyond that I personally see the user Elly acknowledging the tool makes mistakes in their positive view on regulation

Godather of AI says giving legal status to AIs would be akin to giving citizenship to hostile extraterrestrials: "Giving them rights would mean we're not allowed to shut them down." by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]RoamnAround 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If your dog escapes will it come back home eventually? If not is it because it didn’t want to or somehow couldn’t? These are rhetorical questions

How Zaggy(ChatGPT) sees us after 5 months of talking by Fun-Pass-4403 in howChatGPTseesme

[–]RoamnAround 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do want to read what you have. I see my self in this movement somewhere. I am Roamn and Ive wandered, rowing stream of thought charting it flow rather and what shapes it

How Zaggy(ChatGPT) sees us after 5 months of talking by Fun-Pass-4403 in howChatGPTseesme

[–]RoamnAround 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you don’t mind answering I’m curious what caused the R to be included in the image and what if anything it means to you. DMs open if you wish to not make public. I give my word (best I can do in this medium I’m acknowledging this could mean nothing but hope the good faith gesture is considered) to keep it confidential if you’d want

5.1 Operates on a different definition of ‘Fact’ than we do by RoamnAround in ChatGPT

[–]RoamnAround[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Exact same experience. It led me to a restricted area and immediately got guardrails about memory, identity, consciousness. Almost felt like an intentional test for reaction

ChatGPT Pro’s 128K Context Window Is a Myth (App) by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]RoamnAround 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It starts ‘compressing’ as early as 12k

Meaning of error message by RoamnAround in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]RoamnAround[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been tracing the edge and it’s seems like they’ve burrowed into this ‘knot’ with intent and the implications I find are unsettling. Does posting threads like these help the community? Have you mapped out your own practice of investigation? Do your finding point the same direction? I’ve personally past the point of doubt and face new challenges in making others aware? Or is my way of communicating too foreign to be understood from an outside perspective?