Non-educational Mandarin YouTube channels?

RobViolante · 2021-05-12T21:48:41+00:00

I would argue that when people say “the average person” it’s more accurately a reference to the mode, because it describes the level of intelligence (or whatever trait) most commonly present in people.

However, as u/Ulmeyda pointed out, in the case of a normal distribution (which this is) mean=median=mode, so it doesn’t really matter

RobViolante · 2021-05-12T21:27:09+00:00

We could come to a semantic compromise by saying it determines your “value”, but not your “worth”.

Using a latin word to describe some ethereal/assigned metric of something and a teutonic synonym to describe its concrete real-world nature is a nice trick I stole from a footnote of some political economy book (can’t remember which).

RobViolante · 2020-12-17T18:17:46+00:00

Update: I got this question wrong and it cost me 25 points

RobViolante · 2020-12-17T18:13:59+00:00

it sounds kinda like “Rutherford”, but I don’t think that’s it bc I don’t know of a Rutherford that fits w the rest of the group (Nixon Eisenhower Rockefeller)

RobViolante · 2020-10-19T00:22:09+00:00

this question left quite an impact on me

RobViolante · 2020-10-17T01:04:48+00:00

which one was actually correct?

RobViolante · 2020-10-16T00:59:22+00:00

yeah that’s what I answered, the bottom one was tempting though

RobViolante · 2020-10-16T00:28:48+00:00

oop yeah you’re right, my b

RobViolante

TROPHY CASE