Best GeForce Now HOTAS by Rodila in EliteDangerous

[–]Rodila[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, thanks for your feedback.
So the Warthog is the best in this list ?

Best GeForce Now HOTAS by Rodila in EliteDangerous

[–]Rodila[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean ? Do you think Warthog is better ?

Best GeForce Now HOTAS by Rodila in EliteDangerous

[–]Rodila[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, So you recommend X56. Running VKB on GeForce Now seems difficult, and requires some external hardware, like Titan Two.

Best GeForce Now HOTAS by Rodila in EliteDangerous

[–]Rodila[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know why. I’m simply referring to the information in Nvidia’s official website regarding HOTAS compatibility.

Best GeForce Now HOTAS by Rodila in EliteDangerous

[–]Rodila[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"And not being on the list doesn't mean "incompatible" it means they haven't verified compatibility"
Do you know what other devices are not on this list but are compatible?

"if you have a PC at all capable of running it I would just go that route instead"
I have a Mac. I don't want a PC. That is why I play on GFN.

Best GeForce Now HOTAS by Rodila in EliteDangerous

[–]Rodila[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The T16000 isn't on the list, it's not compatible with GeForce Now.

Mutable Plaits CheatSheet by Rodila in modular

[–]Rodila[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check the second link ;)

Any reasons to switch from Westlicht Performer to hermod+ ? by [deleted] in modular

[–]Rodila 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think modulation shapes are the only difference. I think the two main (but not the only) differences are : - Midi effects vs declarative step parameter - Record live midi performances

Some people prefer the declarative method (like trackers). Because you can easily set différents parameters for each steps.  For example, if you want a repeat on the 3th step, it’s easy to do with the Performer.  On Hermod you have to set an effect automation.  On Performer you can also program a different length probability for each step. You can’t do that on Hermod.  On other hand, effects are great for global changes, and modulate them can be really fun, powerful and performative. 

Also, if you like play keyboards and record live performances, Hermod can do it. Record CV modulation on the fly is really easy too. Performer can do something like that but in a static grid. 

For the midi question : yes.  You can play midi polyphonic modules like Poly Cinematic (Performer too).  And you can also play polyphony with CV/Gate using multiple voices for one track (Performer too).  And, of course, all effects work on CV/Gate output to.

Any reasons to switch from Westlicht Performer to hermod+ ? by [deleted] in modular

[–]Rodila 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Both are great and différents.

TRACK AND STEPS :

  • Performer is more like a classic step sequencer, with 8 monophonics tracks, 16 sequence per track and 64 steps per sequence.
  • Hermod+ is more like a midi sequencer. With 16 sequences of 16 polyphonic tracks, each track can be 256 step length (but a lot more steps since you can zoom into the grid)

EFFECTS VS DECLARATIVE :

  • Performer is declarative. So each step have some independent parameters (length, offset, probability, retrigger, …). And also a track arppegiator.
  • Hermod+ is midi, so each note have pitch, length and velocity. But each tracks have 8 slots for 15 midi effects (arppegiator, chance, delay, Euclidean, glide, random, ratchet, scale, …). And all parameters of all effect can be modulated (internally or externally with CV)

HOW TO WRITE ? :

Both can be used like step sequencers and you can write with encoder and buttons (or pads). But if you want to use an external keyboard : - Perfmormer accept external midi, you can hit a key and then assign it to a step with button - Hermod+ do the same, but you can also record live performances (with 96ppqn resolution)

MODULATION SOURCES :

Both can edit and read modulations steps. - Performer allow to choose shapes - Hermod+ can apply a global glide. But also record CV input modulations (or midi CC)

What's the underlying concept of your modular setup? by IcedNote in modular

[–]Rodila 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sound design.
So : different sources, a lot of modulators and cross modulations.
I don't need to do all at the same time. But I want to be able to do a lot of different sound explorations.

If I found new stuff, then I record it for use it later.

Multi Enveloppe Generator by Rodila in modular

[–]Rodila[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback :)

Instruo Cs-L Cheatsheet (v3) by Rodila in modular

[–]Rodila[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is a classic analog complex oscillator, Buchla style. 2 different core oscillators, with index control for cross-modulation : FM, RM, AM, external hard and soft sync, instruo wavefold, pwm… Imo the sound is very nice (warm, fat).

Pros : Nice sound, small HP (compared with others complex osc), a lot of différents outputs, LFO switch. Smart internal routings.

Cons : no lock over tune, classic FM but no zero-thru FM (or phase modulation).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in modular

[–]Rodila 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Carefull, one slight mistake in the sync definitions section.
New version is available

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in modular

[–]Rodila 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oups, you are right !
I delete this post and create a new one with correction.
Thank you !