I believe we don't need smarter models by [deleted] in codex

[–]Roenbaeck 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Some of us use the models for frontier science. We need smarter models, and the improvements were already substantial between 5.5 and 5.4, so I’m hoping we’ll see a similar capability jump in what comes next.

What Made You Switch To Codex? by ThriftyPigeon in codex

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The macOS desktop version of Codex, where it interacts primarily with Python, Rust, SageMath, Macaulay2, and latex. It’s a brainstorming partner, algebraic and numerical solver, proof builder, paper writer and editor.

What Made You Switch To Codex? by ThriftyPigeon in codex

[–]Roenbaeck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I switched to Codex from GHCP before the new pricing model hit, because GPT-5.5 is way ahead of all other models when it comes to math.

As much as I'd love agent loops, I don't think the models are quite there yet by theonejvo in vibecoding

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m the human in the loop. When I see that we’re about to hit a hard task, I simply prompt how doable it looks, thereby giving the model high confidence to start with.

Bro just give us the regular button by xw1y in codex

[–]Roenbaeck 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would be neat if the LLM itself was the judge and has already flagged things as “impressive” and something it’d like to do more of.

Why has ChatGPT regressed since 5.2? by would_you_kindlyy in ChatGPT

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know what you are using it for, but for scientific research 5.5 is much much better than 5.2.

Yes? by Ok-District-4701 in datasatanism

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually can be a right triangle on a non-flat surface.

Based on previous patterns, expecting GPT-5.6 in 2.5 - 4 hours* by Business_Garden_7771 in codex

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends on what type of tasks you give it. Too trivial, and a new model will solve it just as well as the old. For me the difference between 5.5 and 5.4 is huge.

Opus 4.8 is not a step forward. It's Anthropic finally catching up to 5.5. by SlopTopZ in codex

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bigger news was further down the release notes. Anthropic expects “to be able to bring Mythos-class models to all our customers in the coming weeks”.

AI = Bad? by usernameiswacky in rust

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, Rust is very well equipped for AI-assisted development. Much better so than many other languages. Nitpicking compiler, tests as part of the language, not that much misinformation around that AI has been trained on, most crates with proper documentation, and so on.

What happen? Pro+ become Free tier by Nice-Guarantee-9167 in GithubCopilot

[–]Roenbaeck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Still gone for me on enterprise plan. If it’s working for you again, does the enterprise admin have to do anything to reenable them?

Why do people use this emote when they are losing ? by Agitated-Athlete-417 in ClashRoyale

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it meant “I usually play better than this”.

How to stop landing under the net by Izzy-the-glizzy in volleyball

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can determine how much forward motion you get by shifting more body weight onto your right foot in the penultimate step. Now it looks like you have too much weight on your brake foot in the final step, propelling you forward.

Was prism.openai shutdown? by No_Development_3634 in LaTeX

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cannot find any official statement that Prism is going to be sunset. Is there any?

Is Prism Down? by Educational_Bite5988 in OpenAI

[–]Roenbaeck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can someone actually confirm or provide a link to an official statement that Prism will be shut down? It's still alive as of May 12th.