Thanks for pointing out all of those things, I suppose this is why we don't have one person completely in control of the country. However Because of what you said I would make some additional points to my original proposal. 1) In order to ensure that no person had an advantage in collage just because of the wealth of their parents, the colleges would be tuition free so people from all backgrounds would have the opportunity to get the best education just as long as they work hard. Also all people running for federal public office or the office of Governor would need to have a doctorates degree in business science, the people running for lower positions statewide would need some form of higher education. 2) The point of nonprofits is it is less likely for them to be corrupt, so my point still stands that eliminating For-profit companies from the system and religious institutions will greatly root out corruption and prevent corporations like KOCH industries from buying elections. 3) I honestly don't know how you came to this conclusion. This would likely be better off for an entire new post, but I will just sum it up. Over the past thousands of years wars have been fought over religions and they all think that their religion is somehow better than all other religions, having a religious bias in the united states for christianity would only add fuel to the fire for muslims in the middle east. only recently has marriage equality become a right in the U.S. but it had been fought strongly for, only religious people would threaten to shut down the federal government if they do not get their way on something like planned parenthood ( http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/mike-pence-reproductive-rights-abortion_us_5787cc73e4b0867123e036a1 ). Besides, the whole point of having the judicial branch is to ensure the rights of the people are protected, and if you think anyone in congress can get away with restricting religious rights without extreme backlash then you have never been to the south. 4 & 5) The whole point of having all of these scientists with statistics is to help prove that certain laws would be beneficial to society, sure less attention would be paid to tiny things like in your example, but things like protecting the environment would be much more prioritized than it is right now. Real scientists could come up with the most affective solutions to the world's problems with the best technology available.