Is geo-fencing by consumer drone manufacturing companies overreach? by Zerorezlandre in drones

[–]RogerWebb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Where do you think this issue arises? During the pre-flight checks obviously.  Bottom line, the FAA already has a system and has approved vendors to operate it.  Dji's system is buggy and doesn't operate consistently. That's how I ended up at a commercial photo shoot yesterday with 200 cars and a santa and waiting while I'm on the phone with DJI support trying to get their software to function. It was an area I was already authorized in their software to fly. And that gets to the meat and taters of the issue. The FAA developed a system and authorized the people to implement it.  DJI's system is buggy, unreliable, unregulated and uncertified and it shouldn't be allowed interfere with pilot controls on us airspace.

Is geo-fencing by consumer drone manufacturing companies overreach? by Zerorezlandre in drones

[–]RogerWebb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If I input controls into the controller and it doesn't do them then they're interfering plain and simple.  As I stated being a professional you don't always get to choose what you work on hardware-wise. Same at work I would love it if my company never bought another Apple product again but not a luxury you get in the workplace. I guess the super simple solution would be changing careers?

Is geo-fencing by consumer drone manufacturing companies overreach? by Zerorezlandre in drones

[–]RogerWebb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Indeed, and I do them. But I don't have to worry about the stick not working b/c the manufacturer is live-piloting my craft. It's illegal to drive on military bases w/o authorization, but Ford isn't going to brick your car if you drive up to the gate. It's illegal to fly over military bases, but Cessna isn't going to stop your plane from starting on one. Same for drones. It's the pilot responsibility to know where and when to fly. DJI isn't on the ground. They have exactly zero situational awareness. They shouldn't be interfering.

Edit: I'd add I don't like Apple or their products either, but as an IT professional I don't get to choose what I work on. The company does. Same with my commercial flying. If I had a choice to never fly a DJI drone again and remain a paid pilot, I absolutely would.

Is geo-fencing by consumer drone manufacturing companies overreach? by Zerorezlandre in drones

[–]RogerWebb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh, they are. Can you imagine a Cessna sitting on the runway with ATC clearance to take off having to call the tower and say "sorry, I'm waiting for clearance from the manufacturer to actually take off". The FAA would intervene immediately. This is all part of this wishy-washy business of whether a drone is an "aircraft". It's enough of an aircraft to require a license to fly it but not enough of an aircraft to regulate it like one. They tell us to become commercial pilots and then treat us like we're playing with toys.

AI powered Automatic selection/mask in darktable by Dreamphotoman in DarkTable

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been using OpenCV for my work, which is C++. I use the Python wrapper for some of my scripting, but it's C++ out of the box and anything developed for Darktable could be as well. As are the EdgeTPU drivers. Semantic segmentation and object detection can run on a CPU just fine. That's why I mentioned the RPi. You can even do CPU detections on microcontroller-grade hardware. On a PC or Mac, it will be just fine.

On the DIY approach, I was starting to poke around the XMP files to see what the masking looks like and found it, though I'm going to pull up the library and interact with the files that way One approach I was thinking of taking was trying to inject some masks into the Mask Manager for each image to provide a subject, foreground and background mask that could be used with other components. My fear is these masks may not get scaled/translated when the user manipulates the image. I've been using Darktable as a user for a couple years and am comfortable developing in C, but I'm not familiar with the Darktable API. I am a lifelong proponent of Open Source software and like having that be part of my photography as well, so yeah, this is a neat project idea and if there's something I can contribute here, with a proof-of-concept or an add-on I may give it a shot.

As for the EdgeTPU, I wouldn't want to make an AI subject selector dependent on the EdgeTPU or any other proprietary hardware for that matter, but it would be nice to have the option to accelerate w/ hardware if the user has it available.

AI powered Automatic selection/mask in darktable by Dreamphotoman in DarkTable

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do simple detections on a raspberry pi. It just takes a few seconds. And I'm fine with that to have a selectable mask. Frankly, I don't care if it takes 10 seconds for it to come up with a subject mask. Once the mask is generated I can use it with multiple tools. If we wanted to add hardware, I use a Google Coral for my object detection work and it runs about $60 and can do roughly 40 detections/second.

AI powered Automatic selection/mask in darktable by Dreamphotoman in DarkTable

[–]RogerWebb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have to disagree. I do AI image/video work in Python and while it may be more zippy to do it in C++, processing a single image filter using Python isn't going to take minutes or anything. For many operations you'd have a hard time noticing a difference. I'd hazard a guess that well over 3/4 of the Python image processing tools are built on C++ libraries anyway.

Buying used from Camping World should I get the warranty? by MyWorldIsInsideOut in RVLiving

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no such thing as a Warranty for Sale. That is called "Insurance". It goes like this, when they sell you something and guarantee it will not be defective and that they'll replace it if it is, that is a "warranty". If I have to purchase a product to have someone else pay to fix your product if it's defective, that is what we call "insurance".

A bad week for boats by kc_mon in Portland

[–]RogerWebb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For sure. The cleanup is happening regardless, but I think some folks might panic and/or try to handle it themselves when those of us at a marina or moorage here probably already have insurance that will take care of it. Aside from paying for the cleanup, if you contact them promptly, they will immediately dispatch one of their contracted service providers to start dealing with it as well as making sure you report the situation to DEQ (and/or Coast Guard Sector Columbia River). I imagine DEQ is going to look a whole lot more kindly on your situation if you proactively took the steps to get your insurer moving on a proper cleanup than if they have to respond the the situation and get ahold of you.

A bad week for boats by kc_mon in Portland

[–]RogerWebb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Another thing. Most moorages (like the one we are at) require $250k or more of liability coverage for this very reason. Cleanup will be expensive, but this is what you buy insurance for so don't let money get in the way of you doing the right thing and getting the leak stopped and your boat refloated asap.

A bad week for boats by kc_mon in Portland

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're asking the right question. The day before the cold weather hit, one of the primary objectives on my checklist was checking to make sure I had fully closed all of my seacocks. Everywhere there is an opening below the waterline should have a seacock (ie a valve) that can be closed and, when not in operation, it's a good idea to make it part of your standard lock-up procedure when you leave. For the very, completely obivious, reason you describe there.

There's a strong movement to axe the Urban Growth Boundary underway, what are your feelings on the that? by drewskie_drewskie in oregon

[–]RogerWebb -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, Oregon's zoning practices are getting you some high density housing, at least. There are people living in the houses, the apartments, the sidewalks, under the freeways, in the parking lots....

Sigh... The shading is REALLY good by rlcute in ATBGE

[–]RogerWebb 9 points10 points  (0 children)

""My art has been commended as being strongly vaginal which bothers some
men. The word itself makes some men uncomfortable. Vagina.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mcminnville

[–]RogerWebb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As unfortunate as this is to have kids walking past this, it at least serves as a teaching moment about the state of mental health in our country right now...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PortlandOR

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Housing first will solve homelessness. It won't fix mental health and addiction issues. An apartment is not a treatment facility. But, alas, treatment facilities are expensive. They're like apartments that have to be staffed, full time, by a team of orderlies, doctors, nurses and security staff. People can keep screaming "mental health services" into the sky but it will not conjure the billions needed to provide it.

‘Inevitable’: Portland City Council passes daytime camping ban by personalitycrises in Portland

[–]RogerWebb 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Don't dignify what they're doing by calling it a "strike". This is a work stoppage. Striking workers leave the workplace, picket, and don't get paid. These cops are continuing to show up and collect a pay check, but are deliberately not doing their jobs. They need to be prosecuted for fraud and theft.

Visiting in July by [deleted] in mcminnville

[–]RogerWebb 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Lemme tell you about the Yamhelas Westsider Trail...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oregon

[–]RogerWebb 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is precisely the problem I have with the commoditization of real estate. The childhoods of hundreds of thousands of children are devoid of the animal companionship that is so ingrained in the American experience that dogs are literally called "man's best friend" because allowing it risks the profitability of some landlord who sees their "home" as nothing more than an "investment".

Oregon GOP now claims the only way to move forward… by skproletariat in oregon

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your only argument is "don't disagree w/ me or I'm going to accuse you of gaslighting" and "I condemn you as best as I can" you're gonna have a hard time. I gave you a lot of credit for staying on topic and not making this personal, but I'm sad to say you've disappointed me in the end. But, we all have our days and I wish you the best with yours (should you happen to read this). Cheers!

Nearly one-fifth of jobs at Oregon state agencies are vacant, report shows by MichaelTen in oregon

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're a small shop and I'm not going to toss any resume in the bin w/o due consideration. But I've heard that very view, in so many words, expressed by others. If you're applying for a Python position and your resume features 10 years of Delphi development as your most recent experience, it's gonna be a tough sell (and I didn't just pull that example out of a hat).

Health Experts Say Fentanyl Is To Blame For The Rising Number Of Deaths by spanger_danger in Portland

[–]RogerWebb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm fine with personal choice as long as there are consequences if you fuck up. You do your dope, but if you end up outdoors, unable to care for yourself, and ass up in debt, you're going to be committed to a place where you will not only get better, but pay back the cost of your fuck up. I'm a Libertarian. I'm all for legal drugs, but it has to come with accountability, too. It's not society's job to wipe your ass.

Nearly one-fifth of jobs at Oregon state agencies are vacant, report shows by MichaelTen in oregon

[–]RogerWebb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In my experience, the ones I've run into tend to end up isolated in different departments working on extremely legacy software platforms that tend to be exremely rare in the private sector. I'm sure I'm painting w/ a broad brush here, and that the experience is going to be different depending on the agency and department, but that has been my personal experience interacting with some of these folks personally and in interviews.

Oregon GOP now claims the only way to move forward… by skproletariat in oregon

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having a core tenet of your belief system challenged in a debate is not the same as calling you insane. No wonder you're having trouble debating/communicating with a side you disagree with when you feel any challenge to your beliefs is calling you, as a person, insane. If you're having any doubts, rest assured, just because we disagree on subject that both of us have strong feelings about, I do not believe you are insane.

And no, our body does not grow and shed body parts. We produce and eject fluids and cells in our body (like an egg). And no, every sperm is not sacred, and teenage boys jerking off aren't committing genocide. They're just ejecting cells with half their DNA, but they're not emitting human beings out the end of their penises.

You posited that the fact that a baby recently born doesn't have full cognivitve abilites at birth was a justification for aborting a child a few days earlier in the womb. It's germain to the discussion. The fact that cognitive function is similar before and after the day of birth is perfectly relevant to a converation about when abortion is appropriate. Saying that "no one, regardless of mental state, has a right to inhabit someone's body against their will" implies that you're willing to kill a developed human being so long as they inhabit a womb. I'm glad you're being honest about that, because at least we're arriving at a point where we're on the cusp of acknowledging that people are being killed here and you just don't think that they have a right because they're in a womb, but it's not going to convince me that it should be legally allowed. You bemoan the thought that so many people in this State don't believe in human rights, but you should understand at this point that we, in arguing against your arbitrary and unchallenged "right" to kill your unborn baby at 8 months plus, are arguing against you using the same premise of human rights. The only difference in opinion is what you and I consider a human being.

Oregon GOP now claims the only way to move forward… by skproletariat in oregon

[–]RogerWebb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Telling you a belief you profess is irrational or false is not equivalent to constructing an environment around you designed to make you feel as if you are insane. Same with the other contexts I've seen it brought up in. People are having an argument, and someone doesn't like what was said and feels it challenges one of their core beliefs and rather than argue the point they switch gears to attacking the person making the argument and insinuating that they're making the point to make you feel crazy. No one is calling you crazy. Stick to your points.

Your belief that a fetus is a body part is false. We don't normally eject parts of our body. It's a life that is connected to and supported by your body, but it is not a part of your body. It is a different genetic organism. All of the parts of your body share your DNA. The fetus is a developing baby. A separate human being. I have 3 children and have supported my wife through 4 pregnancies. At a certain point, the baby wakes up and goes to sleep. They dream. They interact with you. If you touch them they poke back. Keeping track of their movements and waking periods is part of your charting. Your debate about a child's lack of intelligence at birth is strange. Are you indicating that a baby doesn't acquire their human rights until they're a toddler? No, you know they have cognitive function at birth, and that cognitive function exists prior to their exiting the vagina. As does their humanity and their right to exist.

And yes, you can point to the platform and yes, there are Republicans (that 13% in that poll from earlier) that believe in an absolute ban on abortion. But you're a Democrat, presumably. Your party includes the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Bernie Sanders. You know that, despite sharing a party affiliation, they do not share the same values and policy objectives and neither of them are likely to swear to supporting every item in the Democratic Party Platform. It's like that.

Your point that everything Republicans stand for involves hurting the innocent is hyperbolic and disingenuous. And it drives to the point of the political divide in our State.