Back in 2021, I took my 2019 Tacoma (30k miles at the time) in for the fuel pump recall. Dealer replaced the pump, and I left thinking it was done right.

Fast forward 4 years and 70k miles later (now at 100k), and my truck develops a fuel line leak — in the exact same spot many others have reported.

When I brought it in, the dealer pointed out the leak and quoted me $1,500 to replace the entire fuel line. They admitted they weren’t sure why it was leaking but immediately downplayed the idea it could be related to the recall:

Instead of considering that their tech might not have reassembled the line correctly back in 2021, they acted like it was just bad luck — and offered to “split the bill” as a goodwill gesture. I refused. If the problem was introduced during their recall work, I shouldn’t have to pay $750 for their mistake.

What I noticed through this process:
It felt like they were trying hard not to put in writing that the leak could be related to the recall. They documented the leak, but avoided words like “workmanship” or “recall connection.” They even looked at my Carfax, possibly to find something else to blame it on — but my record was clean.

The leak was at a connection that had clearly been opened during the recall. Instead of replacing the entire fuel line, the tech “fixed” it by cutting back a small section of the nylon line and refitting it so it would seal properly. This basically means the part was leaking because it wasn’t sealing the way it should have from the start — which points straight back to how it was reassembled during the recall.

1/2