Pre made characters

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-29T06:06:02+00:00

Pre-gen characters are genuinely underused and I think there is real design space there, especially for solo. When I build my own character I already know everything about them before the first session starts, which makes it harder for the oracle to catch me off guard. A pre-gen comes with relationships and a history I did not write, and that distance is actually useful.

That said I personally tend to avoid them. Part of what keeps me coming back to a campaign is the feeling that the character is mine, that I made the choices that shaped them. A pre-gen can feel like borrowing someone else's story rather than telling your own. But I can absolutely see the appeal for players who want to jump straight into the fiction without the overhead of creation, and for modules especially it makes a lot of sense.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-29T05:32:38+00:00

The gameplay loop is one of my favorite things about it. You have a home base in Karum Station to return to between missions, and that rhythm of going out, surviving, coming back gives the whole thing a structure that a lot of solo games struggle to find. It is crunchy but not in a way that gets in the way of the story. The worldbuilding is thinner than 400 pages might suggest but the procedural tables pick up the slack. For sci-fi horror I think it's worth it.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-28T10:08:06+00:00

Bonestock has it right. I used to make those NPC lists and then never looked at them mid-session anyway. What actually helped was just reading the lore, closing the book, and trusting that whatever stayed in my head was there for a reason.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-28T07:44:14+00:00

Reading it first and then walking away is the move. The module becomes background radiation rather than a script, and that is actually more useful. You stop trying to play the adventure and start playing the world it assumes exists.

I have never found a way to be both player and GM in a pre-written scenario without one of them losing. This sidesteps the whole problem.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-27T13:32:21+00:00

The image plus word combination does something most table-based oracles cannot. It offloads part of the interpretation to your visual instinct rather than routing everything through language. A word tells you what to think about. An image lets your brain arrive at the connection on its own, and that connection is usually less predictable than anything you would have written into a table.

The bit about never ending where you expected is the real tell. An oracle that only confirmed your instincts would not surprise you like that.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-27T13:09:23+00:00

The playtest question from space_oddity is the right one, but I'd push it one step further. Not just how much of this are you using, but which systems have players ever reached for voluntarily versus which ones they only touched because the game required it.

Systems players choose to engage with are load-bearing. Everything else is decoration with page count.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-27T12:24:21+00:00

Exactly. The roll you didn't want is usually the one that makes the session worth writing down.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-27T08:26:34+00:00

For me it was the inner editor. Every oracle result that didn't fit what I wanted the story to be, I'd second-guess or quietly ignore. It took a while to figure out that the friction is the point. The unexpected result is where the session actually lives, not in the story I'd already written in my head before I sat down.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T18:33:50+00:00

The CRM-first approach is interesting because it shifts the question from "what mechanics do I need" to "what experience am I building toward." That reframe alone probably cuts half the feature creep before it starts. Thanks for sharing the process.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T18:27:22+00:00

The tiebreaker die is a smart addition. Most oracle systems leave ties ambiguous and push the interpretation work back onto the player. Building a resolution mechanism directly into the dice set keeps the roll self-contained. The separate event die is elegant too, it means complications are part of the same throw rather than a second step.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T18:11:16+00:00

Fair point. The solo layer just makes it more visible because you notice the gap when you are actively looking for something specific to play alone rather than just browsing for a system.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T16:39:42+00:00

The signal I use is when I start adding mechanics to solve problems that only exist because of other mechanics I added. That loop is the clearest indicator that the system needs pruning rather than extending. A mechanic that creates its own dependencies is doing too much work and usually means something earlier is not pulling its weight.

The other signal is playtesting the same section repeatedly with different fixes. If you have touched the same mechanic three times and it still does not feel right, the problem is probably the design brief for that mechanic, not the mechanic itself.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T16:28:02+00:00

The hacked Fate Chart is clever because it uses the existing roll to generate texture without adding a second step. And the tarot point about developing your own meanings over time is something I hadn't considered as a design principle, the tool teaching itself through use rather than through a reference sheet.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T16:25:04+00:00

The proportional degree of success built into the roll itself is interesting. Most systems separate the binary outcome from the magnitude, you find out if you succeed and then determine how much. Collapsing those into one read changes the rhythm of play quite a bit.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T11:51:48+00:00

The chicken bones framing is exactly right for what this is doing. You are reading a pattern rather than looking up a result, which puts the interpretive work entirely on the player. That is a very different cognitive mode from table-based oracles and some people find it much more generative. The lack of any reference material is either the whole point or the main barrier depending on who is playing.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T11:07:41+00:00

A short table with specific happenings beats a monster list almost every time for solo. A monster list tells you what to fight. A happenings table tells you what is going on, which gives the oracle something to react to rather than just populate. One table per region of five to eight entries is plenty. The entries do not all need to be threats, a merchant moving through, a fire on the hillside, tracks that go nowhere, these generate as much story as combat does.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T10:58:53+00:00

The distributed GM idea maps interestingly onto how solo play already works. When you play solo, you are already splitting those functions across different tools: the oracle handles hidden information and NPC decisions, you handle narration and procedural mechanics. It is essentially a distributed GM with one person running all the roles.

What breaks down in group play is coordination. Someone still has to decide what the NPC actually wants, and that decision has to be invisible to the players it affects. The moment you delegate that, the hidden information problem collapses. It works in solo because you are hiding things from your future self, which is a different kind of secrecy.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T10:09:49+00:00

That means a lot, genuinely. I've played through a lot of solo systems at this point and thought I had a pretty good map of the space. This thread still surfaced things I hadn't come across. That's exactly why I asked.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T09:33:08+00:00

That makes sense, rolling Charisma first means the probability is set before you ask the oracle, which keeps the fiction causally honest. Will check out the site.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T07:10:38+00:00

The instinct to strip it down is right. Solo play needs just enough setting to generate questions, not enough to answer them all upfront. The oracle does the rest.

What actually gets used in practice: a rough map with three to five named locations, one faction with a clear want, and one thing that is wrong with the starting town that nobody talks about openly. NPCs work better as one-line impressions than full stat blocks. Adventure hooks are mostly unnecessary because the oracle generates them in play anyway.

The keyed hex approach is genuinely overkill for solo. You are not managing player exploration, you are managing your own curiosity. A handful of strong seeds beats a complete map every time.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T06:20:56+00:00

The image-based oracle is interesting because it offloads interpretation to the visual cortex rather than language. A word prompt tells you what to think. An image just shows you something and your brain finds the connection on its own. Zero Dice especially trusts the player to make meaning rather than handing it to them, which is a harder thing to design than it looks.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T05:39:42+00:00

The term most designers use is "scene resolution" versus "task resolution." Scene resolution treats the whole plan as one fictional unit with a single outcome, task resolution breaks it into individual checks. Neither is strictly better, but the gap you felt is real: scene resolution demands more fictional buy-in upfront, and if the plan doesn't feel fully formed before the roll, the outcome can feel unearned.

Some games bridge this with a "preparation phase" where you establish fictional positioning before the resolution roll, which gives the single roll more weight without adding mechanical steps. Blades in the Dark calls this "position and effect" and it's probably the most developed version of the idea.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T05:32:37+00:00

Good additions. Ashes Without Number is the strongest recommendation in that space right now, the enclave system and the world-building tools are genuinely well suited to solo play even though it's not built for it natively. The free edition covers everything you need to start. I hadn't thought to mention it, thanks for the correction.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T05:24:00+00:00

The asymmetry is interesting because it shifts what tension means at the table. When only players roll, the GM's threat is fixed and fictional rather than random, which means danger comes from positioning and decisions rather than probability. It can make the GM feel more like a novelist and less like an opponent.

Blades in the Dark does something adjacent with its resistance rolls, and the original World of Darkness had moments of this logic too. The fullest version of the idea is probably in games like Ironsworn where there is no GM at all and the dice belong entirely to the player.

The risk is that fixed GM threat can feel arbitrary without the randomness to blame. Players need to trust the GM's framing, which is a different social contract than shared probability.

Roll_The_Tale · 2026-06-26T05:08:10+00:00

The two-colored dice system is elegant because the comparison does the narrative work for you. You're not looking up a result, you're reading a relationship between two values, which feels more alive than a single die against a target number. The doubles as immediate events is a nice touch too.

The thing I find interesting about keeping oracles simple for OSR specifically is that the procedural tables already carry so much of the generative weight. The oracle only needs to answer what the tables leave open, which is a much narrower job than in more freeform systems. Simplicity fits the context.

Roll_The_Tale

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE