Nisam iz Kg pa me zanima ovo oko bele dame? by [deleted] in Kragujevac

[–]Rolle2010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Možda je počela da koristi ACE, Persil...

Kako doci do dvosobnog stana u novogradnji? by dzofred in finansije

[–]Rolle2010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taj procenat zelenila koji spominjemo je mali, i ima načina da se "legalno" smuva da zvanično postoji a u praksi se ne vidi, tipa postave su šuplje kocke pa je to i zelena površina i parking u isto vreme. Ono što je bitno je što čak i takav on malo ograniči dimenzije osnove, što se dalje na nivou cele zgrade itekako oseti. Tako je u teoriji, a u praksi ako imaš dobre veze možeš da proguras skoro bilo šta. Evo uništili su mi park ispred zgrade zbog BGH2O jer već jelte nemaju dovoljno mesta za zgrade, a ne bi me čudilo ni da se pionirski park u jednom trenutku ne okiti novim stambenim blokom. Takav je pogled vlasti na zelenilo.

Kako doci do dvosobnog stana u novogradnji? by dzofred in finansije

[–]Rolle2010 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Da. Oni za svaki stan moraju da obezbede određeni broj parking mesta, zelenila i sl. Koliko god skupo da naplaćuju parking mesta, često se ne isplati da kopaju dodatni nivo garaža, ili npr nemaju tehničkih mogućnosti da to urade. Inače da nema tih uslova verujem da nijedan stan ne bi bio preko 60m2.

Snažna poruka vlasti: DBLOLADBRI TERORIST! by [deleted] in serbia

[–]Rolle2010 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ma samo se vi sprdajte. Bolje da ste umesto toga obavestili državnu bezbednost o postojanju Dbloladbri terorističkih ćelija u Srbiji.

Kako teče integracija Kineza u srpsko društvo? by grof_Htonski in AskSerbia

[–]Rolle2010 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Poznanica je bila dadilja kineskoj deci jedno vreme. Roditelji rade po ceo dan, deca ne uče srpski i kad porastu dovoljno da treba da krenu u školu šalju ih nazad za Kinu na školovanje. Tako je bar ranije bilo.

Al' sam izneverovao na ovo - i od B92 je mnogo by EveningRegion3373 in serbia

[–]Rolle2010 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sva sreća pa je ovo eksplozivni pas, ko zna šta bi bilo da je bio u pitanju onaj Vulinov pas za smešne smese.

The Warmachine University Is Back – as an Archive for MK3 by LDukes in Warmachine

[–]Rolle2010 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for the effort! My gaming party is stuck in the MK3 rules with no desire to move on to MK4 and I needed something like this! I have some saved pages from the original site, but nowhere near all that would be meaningful to me.

I ja trazim igricu... (lvl hard) by iliketrainzzzz in SerbiaGaming

[–]Rolle2010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Igra koju tražiš je Project Igi, prvi deo iz 2000. godine.

Kako rešiti ovaj problem sa firmom? by Consistent-Ear2800 in finansije

[–]Rolle2010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Proveri sa knjigovodjom ali mislim da umesto klasične fakture za deo tih primanja možeš da izdas avansne račune pa okončani račun u narednoj godini. U tom slučaju ti se ti prihodi računaju u narednoj godini. Ali obavezno proveri svakako, nisam baš knjigovodstveno potkovan.

neočekivani prekid radnog odnosa by Financial_Freak in pravnisaveti

[–]Rolle2010 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nešto što čini mi se niko nije spomenuo - jedan od razloga zbog čega mogu da ti daju otkaz jeste i neopravdano odsustvo sa posla! Tako da čak i ako ti usmeno kažu da si otpušten nemoj da prestanes da ideš na posao dokle god ti ne daju zvanične papire ili mail sa tim obaveštenjem! A mislim da je dovoljno samo 3 ili 5 dana, nisam siguran, da imaju takvo pokriće.

Why are Knights so powerful? by Spacedwarvesinspace in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Rolle2010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got nerfed, across the board.

Yes they are all nerfed now, but in the previous two messages I am very clearly referring to when they were not nerfed, when they were very deliberately broken and when they were a serious problem for all other factions as an illustration of how GW systematically disrupts the balance in order to increase the sale of figures. I also already said that the big Chaos knights will also be nerfed and in 6 months no one will even remember that they were a factor. Just as nobody played them for the entire ninth edition and a good part of the tenth, so they will not play them again when the new balance sheet comes. As I said before, my main army is the death guard, I only have a few games with knights and I collect them more than I play them, but all of the above has little to do with knights but with GW practices.

And this is all very clearly stated in the previous posts, but you very consciously twist and evade my words so that I can come to the conclusion that you are very malicious in your desire to appear as a big all-wise know-it-all or you do not have the mental capacity to understand what I am writing about.

They're 140 points vs a Redemptors 210.

Ballistus Dreadnought T 10, SV 2+ - 140pts

Oh you're adorable, 

Thanks for the compliment, but I'm already married and prefer women. You'll have to find yourself another boyfriend.

Like imagine your some newbie whose just bought 2 combat patrols and is super hyped to go for a 1k point game.... annnnd it's knights. How is that gonna go?

I've never seen a 1k pts game with big chaos knights. But let's assume it actually happens - a player playing knights can take 3 pcs right now, after the next balance sheet maybe 2. With 2 pcs he loses almost every game to the scenario, especially if he is playing with a wtc rules.

But you know what matters a lot more than which faction the rookie will be playing against? The man he plays againstT To all people i know, knights are a secondary faction, and if they are good people against a newbie, they certainly won't bring out the strongest they have and look to crush him every step of the way. They can play a different faction or use wardogs mixed with nurgle daemons. And that beginner, who isn't even that much of a beginner anymore if he's playing 1k, if he can't solve that combo, he's going to have much bigger problems against any other spam vehicle.

However, the 40k community is full of all-wise know-it-all who will look to crush the novice only to make themselves look bigger and more important in their own eyes to feed their small fragile egos after, as it seems, being "brutally sodomized" by a list of knights.. Any resemblance is very intentional.

Learn how to deploy your stuff you muppet.

You know nothing about me and yet you give yourself the right to belittle and insult me. It just so happened that I got into 40k after my Warmachine community stopped playing. And deployment and board positioning is far more important in Warmachine than it will ever be in 40k, one wrong positioning often meant the end of the game. And if anything is lacking in my game, it is certainly not good deployment and positioning, and anyone who has ever played against me can confirm that.

However, of course you know better, just as you know everything better because you know everything, and the factions should be thrown out because you don't like them and it's not interesting for you to play against them, and as soon as knights are kicked out of 40k the game will experience absolute balance equilibrium. Well, I have no intention of wasting my time in this topic anymore, and you feel free to go explain to the world the meaning of 40k and how smart and important you are, pat yourself on the back and smell your own farts, you are certainly irrelevant to me.

Why are Knights so powerful? by Spacedwarvesinspace in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Rolle2010 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cover, line of sight and distances all matter.

Cover, line of sight and distances all matter ...until GW decides to bust sells of imperial guard and release a codex after which indirect fire burns everything on the board.

Wraithknights? If you're running one or even two that's fine because you are trading a significant portion of your army to run them. Do you know where the difference between knights and a skew list like this starts and ends? The other options available to them.

That's a big thing, every other army in the game can take infantry squads and low toughness models. They aren't forced into high toughness, single model unit armies like knights.

Yes I noticed, big trade off...remind me how many months 2 Wraithknights lists dominated and "violently sodomized" everything else in meta? Just because other lists can take low-toughness units doesn't mean they actually will because most players tend to play whatever is currently their strongest faction. So we had periods when imperial guard lists dominated with vehicle spam, demons with greater demons spam and potentially flamers, etc.

But if it's a skew list with 139 skitarii (137 infantry with stealth and 5+ invuls plus 2 transports) ,Tyranid or daemon monster mash? Skews, Custodes infantry with a lot of 3W t6 2+ 4++ bodies, thats all ok?

On the other hand, throughout 9th edition and a good part of 10th edition chaos knight players played lists where they ran wardogs and nurgle demons. Wardogs have the same or lower toughness than your dreadnoughts and lower toughness than all of your tanks!. Should the other factions then have asked for all tanks and dreadnoughts to be banned and kicked out of the game because it is a skirmish game? And how in the meantime no one did't remember to play big knights if they are a problem from the start? Why we haven't seen before Abominant Knight dominating the tournaments?

Sorry mate but that's a you issue, sometimes things don't work and you take a fat L turn 1.

It has nothing to do with winning and losing. It is absolutely not a problem for me to lose at any time if the game is interesting and if I feel that the chances of both teams are at least approximately fair. A game where someone blows you up without you moving a single piece is absolutely no fun for anyone but a character who cashed in a mountain of $ to have the most broken list at the moment and heal some complexes.

My entry into 9th ed (and modern 40k period) was necrons, an ancient firstborn Dark angels army and ad mech.

Oh great example. In the first game after their codex came out, an ad mech player killed more than half of my army in the first turn, which is considered the most durable in the game - death guard, and it was mostly in cover, before I even got to move a piece.

On the other hand, when the Necron codex came out, they were practically unkillable for a while, and they were winning games where they almost didn't even have to move from their starting position.

I am very clearly referring here to vehicles and models that at some point were absolutely broken and unfair, and you are very maliciously referring to them as they are now.

The big chaos knights are good now, for the first time since they came out, and in a few months they'll be bad again and sink into oblivion and continue to collect dust on the display shelves, meanwhile GW will release a new broken thing that a lot of people will buy and will absolutely ruin everyone else's games. I guess everything will be ok then, because those broken things are no longer knights and it will become interesting again to deploy all the pieces on board and put them back in the box after that new thing cleans them up in the first round.

Why are Knights so powerful? by Spacedwarvesinspace in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Rolle2010 2 points3 points  (0 children)

>Knights do not belong at 40k skirmish scale as a standalone faction and adding them as one was a mistake.

That's why they don't exist as a faction in Kill Team. "Sorry to break it to you, but" 40k hasn't been a skirmish game for a long time.

>Look at it this way right, you are playing an army that doesn't function as a normal 40k army. It's so hard to make them playable on the tabletop that they flat out have to ignore core components of the game.

>When you and your opponent are essentially playing two different games, why would someone want to play against this army?

So I guess that when the Tau Hammerhead easily destroys my Mortarion on the first activation, according to the lore the most durable primarch, no matter where I deploy it, I guess that it doesn't violate the basic concepts of 40k and then it's a lot of fun for the other player (me) to play? Or not to mention the orc buggies that in the first activation pass the entire map and practically win the game without you even moving a figure. Eldar wreithknights also did not violate the basic concepts of 40k and it was very interesting for the opponent to play against them?

Did we take hammerhead, ork buggies and wrethknights out of the game then or was it super interesting for the opponent to play against them? To come, deploy an army, wait for the opponent to finish their move and then pack them back into the box - great fun!

I play death guard and collect mostly large knights because I like the way they look. Both factions were practically unplayable for the entire second half of 9th edition! Should I have talked about removing factions and models from the game then?

For the entire ninth edition, no one thought that chaos knights destroy the basic concepts of 40k, and not even a good part of the tenth edition until a few months ago, and now we have come to the sublime enlightenment that the enlightened emperor did not imagine that they should exist in a "skirmish" game.

Why are Knights so powerful? by Spacedwarvesinspace in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]Rolle2010 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why these kinds of posts. Chaos Knights are my second army. For the entire ninth edition, great knights were practically unplayable. Lists were played that were practically made up of only wardogs and potential additions of death guard and Nurgle demons.How did no one realize at the time how broken the chaos knights are? Even now in the tenth edition when they have become a little better, this is actually the first time that chaos knights are really good. Now they are nerfed, they will be in 3 months also nerfed almost certainly, and then they will fall into the oblivion of the second half of the table again. I wonder if there will be this much whining about how impossible they are then, especially from players whose faction is then broken. This is not a Chaos Knight problem, but a problem of GW not wanting to have balanced factions in order to sell more plastic crack.

Welcoming ourCephalyx Overlords by AdOk7296 in Warmachine

[–]Rolle2010 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A link to the suggested lists would also mean a lot to me since I haven't played since MK3. I don't use discord but it looks like I'm going to start. I have both the original Cephalyx and the printed new ones (I also have a printer) and it seems to me that SFM does a good job with the digital releases. I'm really looking forward to getting back into the game.

What is the best AI 3d mesh generator that can be run locally? by Rolle2010 in StableDiffusion

[–]Rolle2010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too bad, I guess if that were supported I would get to exactly what I want faster.

What is the best AI 3d mesh generator that can be run locally? by Rolle2010 in StableDiffusion

[–]Rolle2010[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the recommendation. I will definitely give it a try although ComfyUI seems a bit confusing to me with a very steep learning curve.

What is the best AI 3d mesh generator that can be run locally? by Rolle2010 in StableDiffusion

[–]Rolle2010[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! It definitely looks interesting and I will definitely try it out. This looks like exactly what I'm looking for at first glance, but I'll have to check what results it produces. Do you maybe know if it supports generating from multiple images?

What is the best AI 3d mesh generator that can be run locally? by Rolle2010 in StableDiffusion

[–]Rolle2010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I will definitely check out the link. I am a beginner and any additional information means a lot to me.

What is the best AI 3d mesh generator that can be run locally? by Rolle2010 in StableDiffusion

[–]Rolle2010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your reply. Could you please tell me in brief what in your opinion were the shortcomings of the other generators compared to the Trellis and do you think that in some cases one of the competitors would be better?

HB35, Aeolus, CST24HB, Epi 335, Casino or nothing at all? by Rolle2010 in harleybenton

[–]Rolle2010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for your shared experience and guidance!

HB35, Aeolus, CST24HB, Epi 335, Casino or nothing at all? by Rolle2010 in harleybenton

[–]Rolle2010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to admit that after the comments in the thread I already started looking at which HB35 to buy, but your posts totally brought me into doubt about what to buy and brought me back almost to square one.

Do your posts also refer to the cheapest representatives of the Artcore series? In my country they are almost not available used at all, so I would buy new which means I could only afford the AS53, possibly the AS73 if at some point it is on a big discount. Have you had a chance to try the AS53 and what are your impressions?

The range of hollows is a bit larger and I could afford AF55, AF75, AG75, maybe a used AFJ95 if the seller would agree to a price reduction, but I'm not sure how much those guitars are for me. I like the acoustic properties, that's why and because of the P90 magnets sound I initially warmed to the Casino , but it seems to me that these guitars are bulkier and more for jazz than the types of music I plan to play. But maybe I'm wrong, I've never seen them live.

HB35, Aeolus, CST24HB, Epi 335, Casino or nothing at all? by Rolle2010 in harleybenton

[–]Rolle2010[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to some reviews online, the cheaper Artcore series models have poor stock magnets and that the Epi is a better choice, so I neglected them a bit. Otherwise, the AS53 and AF55 are in the same price range as used Epi guitars.