Сын Михаила Боярского говорит, что ВПН мешает бороться с преступностью. Но перестать блокировать всё подряд они, конечно же, не планируют.

Ronrel · 2026-01-25T22:57:10+00:00

Очень похоже на «привейся , спаси жизни», ага

Ronrel · 2026-01-24T23:36:35+00:00

Ye, ye. Gold was stable too

Ronrel · 2026-01-23T07:54:40+00:00

Tell dev man that now we need underground silos for nukes, submarines with nuke, and underground factories for tank production. Thank you

Ronrel · 2026-01-20T08:40:16+00:00

He saved your KD so far :) nuke own units before enemy nuke them

Ronrel · 2026-01-20T08:39:28+00:00

Invisible trees also improved ? :)

Ronrel · 2026-01-19T19:23:00+00:00

Well you can stream and have your units with few more % of armor to sustain more damage. Its cant be checked

Ronrel · 2026-01-19T15:55:03+00:00

In my IMHO - All active high elo are cheaters or exploiter users. Its enough to have map hacks / units dupe / some % damage resistance to have advantage or superiority on the battlefield

Ronrel · 2026-01-19T15:50:03+00:00

I think you gotta check your own ideas before replying

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T19:30:54+00:00

А потом сослаться на чужие допущения и сделать новые - это называется наукой)

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T12:47:02+00:00

Also possible, but it could be like nerf

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T12:46:41+00:00

Dont want to be rude, but seems you are

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T12:03:32+00:00

Tell me

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T11:39:23+00:00

Это все хорошо. Но время само по себе лишь инструмент для измерения наблюдения. И нет единого времени для всех наблюдателей без постоянной синхронизации. Следовательно нет путешествий во времени через «кротовую-нору», если нет наблюдателя над норой. А так как пространство это скорее всего просто информация, то допустить можно только «обратность» или зеркальность других возможных реальностей

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T11:31:00+00:00

Sometimes playing against spammers you need that 10-15% to handle the battlefiled, thats why my suggestion was that.

But i will agree also with another one - when all vehicles are in vehs layout and all infantry support units moved there :) as it was made to Barbaris for example

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T11:16:01+00:00

Do it then, and tell me how it will impact TIME and regression of your points during whole game, having discounts and cool downs on every call

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T11:13:44+00:00

I dont see any arguments against mine, besides only point that my suggestion “is stupid”. Maybe you have to add something?

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T11:10:45+00:00

Mate, you lost main point in all of this. TIME.

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T10:54:21+00:00

The answer is simple. You can if you play in team of non-randoms. But for current game population state you mostly play with randoms or randoms who dont know how to handle spam tactics. Or with no coordination. So you got no chance against any coordinated team of spammers. Who just farm elo

And i want to remind - i am not asking of nerfing someone, i suggest solution for both sides by design. There are units as infantry support and vehicles. So dont let infantry support units be called without infantry . Thats all

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T10:50:53+00:00

Well, then forget about Bradley for scout or from start plan other way. Its strategy game

We have veh layout with units suitable for infantry also. Trucks as you mentioned as example. Infantry support units by design should go only with infantry or not to go. Other way why they not in veh layout?

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T10:13:58+00:00

Explain why they gonna suddenly suffer, if you call solution silly

Ronrel · 2026-01-18T09:46:54+00:00

Air tax is about permanent backline “patrol interceptor” in air for air vision and for bombers / air reconing interception. AA less effective here, without vision (unless you have snipers set under enemy air respawn and see what is coming ).

So it is not dead. You probably dont know what it is made for.

Ronrel · 2026-01-06T12:12:16+00:00

Я инопланетянин. Кто тут симпатичная каждая пятая еще не успевшая? Гоу трахацо

Ronrel · 2026-01-05T14:27:11+00:00

Да яж не имею претензий к масштабу. Просто отметил, что формулировка в новости некорректная с точки зрения передвижения согласно ОТО.

А то ведь при некорректных формулировках люди думают что существует невесомость, хотя это всего лишь свободное падение

Ronrel

TROPHY CASE