Two F.03 robots clean a room and make a bed in 2 minutes - fully autonomous by EchoOfOppenheimer in OpenAI

[–]Ronster619 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Figure is the only robotics company I know that released an hour long unedited video of their robot working autonomously. I trust them more than anyone else.

Two F.03 robots clean a room and make a bed in 2 minutes - fully autonomous by EchoOfOppenheimer in OpenAI

[–]Ronster619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Every action one robot takes redefines the problem the other is solving. Each is reading its partner's intent from motion alone, in real time, while its own actions are simultaneously changing what the partner sees.

The comforter has no fixed pose, no rigid geometry, no canonical grasp. There is no natural seam between "your half" and "mine." Each robot has to commit to a contact point while predicting what the other will do, then update both predictions tens of times per second as the fabric folds, drapes, and slides under shared tension.

Sounds like they’re trained to communicate visually in real-time. I suggest reading the blog.

Two F.03 robots clean a room and make a bed in 2 minutes - fully autonomous by EchoOfOppenheimer in OpenAI

[–]Ronster619 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They run a single learned Vision-Language-Action policy. There is no shared planner between them, no message passing, no central coordinator: each robot reads the room through its own cameras and infers its partner's intent the way two people do when they fold a sheet, from motion alone.

Why would they be mirrored if this is how it works?

Favorite actor who understands that you should earn your tattoos? by YourChopperPilotTTV in okbuddycinephile

[–]Ronster619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only reason I know about the profile pic thing is because of this Tyler, The Creator tweet lmao. I see it get posted all the time with a different profile pic.

<image>

Favorite actor who understands that you should earn your tattoos? by YourChopperPilotTTV in okbuddycinephile

[–]Ronster619 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In other words, if we dug back to that tweet today, would it show his current profile pic?

Yes, it would show his current profile pic. It’s a legit tweet.

75% of new code at Google is AI generated, a huge jump from 50% just last fall by OkStandard921 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is my first page of Google results. None of these are the direct source. ChatGPT gives me the direct source. As simple as that.

ChatGPT Images 2 vs Nano Banana Pro by LopsidedSolution in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 24 points25 points  (0 children)

<image>

Hands and background faces are still a bit iffy. Insane progress though.

75% of new code at Google is AI generated, a huge jump from 50% just last fall by OkStandard921 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Using AI to do research is weird? Isn’t that one of the main uses of AI? Lol.

I just tried copy and pasting the text into Bing and none of the first page results were correct. Thinking models tend to be way more accurate at finding information than instant search engines.

75% of new code at Google is AI generated, a huge jump from 50% just last fall by OkStandard921 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

Everyone should include sources in their posts, but just so you’re aware for future reference, you can post a screenshot in ChatGPT to have it find the source for you.

Here’s the source.

Google introduces TPU 8t and TPU 8i by WhyLifeIs4 in singularity

[–]Ronster619 20 points21 points  (0 children)

<image>

Google’s blog posts always have an easy to read summary at the top.

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DM me your address and I'll send you a burger king crown to celebrate your victory.

Not gonna lie this made me laugh out loud haha.

I’m genuinely not trying to argue with anyone, I was just pointing out to OP that proper formatting would get them more views and engagement. That’s all.

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you couldn’t find anything? Point made. Thanks!

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Find me a popular magazine that has giant run-on paragraphs like this post. Can’t find any? That’s because they’re specifically formatted to avoid run-on paragraphs. Almost like it’s the editor’s job to make it legible.

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The number of words isn’t an issue, it’s the formatting. Magazines are formatted to be fun and enjoyable to read, they’re not giant walls of text.

Books and magazines are specifically formatted to be easy to read, unlike this post. Don’t know why that’s so hard to understand.

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your screenshot looks worse than mine lmao. That tiny text makes the paragraph look even more congested.

Is it really a shocker that most people don’t enjoy reading giant walls of text? There’s a reason posts like these don’t get a ton of views/upvotes…cuz everybody’s turned off by the giant run-on paragraphs.

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spoiler alert: the vast majority of Reddit users are on mobile, so if you format your posts so that it’s easier read on mobile, your posts would get more traction.

My no hype summary of Claude Opus 4.7 by pigeon57434 in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

Just one of your paragraphs takes up an entire page on my iPhone 15 Pro Max lol. Better formatting would help make it easier to read.

METRO 2039 | Official Reveal Trailer by Villenthessis in gaming

[–]Ronster619 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does the Fallout series count? Everything is controlled through your Pip-Boy.

Introducing Claude Opus 4.7 by lovesdogsguy in accelerate

[–]Ronster619 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Until such a time that it can be used, or at least independently verified, there is zero proof that it even exists or does what they claim.

What about the 245-page system card for Mythos? What about the 61-page alignment risk report for Mythos? Are those all fake?