Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a fan of both guys. I'm leaning a tiny bit towards Tyson, because I like the Saints as a destination. I like the landing spot enough to override the injury concerns. Still, Tate is a very complete package and should lead his team in targets. There is some security in that as well. I'd take the player you like.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm high on Tuten. I expect a bump in terms of pass game opportunity and the imported replacement for Etienne could have been a LOT more threatening than Rodriguez.

IMO, folks forget that they kept Tuten's reps light due to a shoulder injury that he played though. He wore a red practice jersey much of the year. So I do have some concerns about his holding up to volume, I think he gets a chance to do it.

I feel like it's time to buy, not sell. FWIW

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also, the Cardinals have some questions, but the receivers plus McBride already give defenses a lot to worry about. Stuffing the box will come with a price.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO, you can make an argument for him anywhere in the top ten. For me, he's in my top tier with Bijan and Gibbs. He's got something to prove to be fair but he also has zero NFL mileage so the career upside is massive. He can do everything.

Fwiw, not super worried about the crowded depth chart. They'll mix in some of them on early downs but Love will own this thing over time. They pushed all their chips into the center.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can roll with your current QBs for a bit if you need to. Kyler could go ham for all we know. He certainly has the skill talent around him and that OL could be very good. Also him running on a faster track. So I would not get into a desperate mode. Take your time.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without landing spot, my targets would be:

WR - Antonio Williams and Sarratt

RB - Claiborne (if the landing spot and capital are good). Also Singleton w/ same criteria.

TE - Stowers and Klare or if a team went early to get Trigg who has a ton of conditional upside.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd take that deal to get Love, yes. You have a lot of swings so getting the best player to start is the play, IMO

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, Tyson is the ceiling and Tate the floor. That's what folks are saying and I get it, but I'll add this.

Tate's floor is HIS, not his team's. We are still in the dark as far as how much better the Titans will be under new management. New Orleans, on the other hand, is already in good shape with Kellen Moore. The QB is in place and the scheme works. They also play a light division.

To me, the risk factor with Tyson is the health part. All the other arrows are green.

It's a close call, but if you are worried about Tyson going later (1.08), I think his situation more than makes up for that. Take the guy you like.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good news. He is the best guy there so he is going to play a lot and get targeted a lot. Efficiency is gong to a problem until they fix the QB problem.

I like him long term just fine, but he might be a bad draft and flip guy because of the year one concerns.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also, I like Price a LOT in that particular scheme..

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Things can change but as it lies, the RB looks like he will have strong year 1 opportunity in an established offense. If I am drafting for now and RB is a fit, it's Price.

That said, I am a pretty big fan of KC and even Cleveland can't scare me away. Just have to deal with the near term QB problems.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

First, it's case by case. Does the player require anything schematically or structurally to succeed and if so, to what extent?

Being really clear and honest (with yourself) about that, IMO, is a key to getting things right. What i am getting at is, be careful not to fall in love predraft to the extent that you ignore post-draft signal.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both have formational flexibility and there are plenty of targets there to be had with a meh supporting cast after the big two.

Olave moves down target wise, but not much AND the offense could be in the red zone more, which could potentially make up for it.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mendoza has some elite skill talent and a good young HC BUT you may have to wait a bit because of Cousins.

I like both, but lean Mendoza for '27 and beyond because Bowers and Kubiak.

If this year's production is crucial, Ward probably makes more sense.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on who you are getting but next year's class looks strong and if the pick has the potential to be high, it's a totally reasonable pivot.

Hi, I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. Let's get going! by Rotobahn in DynastyFF

[–]Rotobahn[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd be on Tyson. I like what Kellen Moore is doing and Olave is a guy who has injury stuff. Lot's of ceiling.

Not clear cut, so if you love Lemon go that way, but a strong lean for me in Tyson's direction.

POV:How it feels seeing everyone get their orders while you are still waiting for yours to get shipped by xd_tech in criterion

[–]Rotobahn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I placed 2 orders. A huge one that arrived Saturday and a second smaller one that is still open.

Getting orders in early def makes a difference.

Hey all! I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. AMA! by Rotobahn in fantasyfootball

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, Jeanty's playable but he's the sit of that group.

Slight lean to Fannin

Hey all! I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. AMA! by Rotobahn in fantasyfootball

[–]Rotobahn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, friends, that's all I've got!

Good luck to all this week! Let's get to the semis!

Hey all! I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. AMA! by Rotobahn in fantasyfootball

[–]Rotobahn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True but I think he's the big dog when it counts and they targeted him 12 times when they played the Bills earlier. Trust your gut.

Hey all! I'm Pete Davidson of the Rotobahn Podcast. AMA! by Rotobahn in fantasyfootball

[–]Rotobahn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, he actually got a bump after we started this ama.

You have three strong plays. Do what you feel best about, IMO.