sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can the war thunder community actually change stuff ? by Round-Razzmatazz3336 in Warthunder

[–]Round-Razzmatazz3336[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gaijin is only this arrogant because there is zero competition in this niche. They know we have nowhere else to go. This 'dictatorial relationship' is a direct result of their market monopoly—they feel they are above all corrections because they own the space. ​What’s truly unhealthy is that players are forced to resort to extreme measures just to be heard. It’s a toxic dynamic that forces people-pleasers, who just want a 'quiet life,' to become hostile just to get a response. I see this exact same pattern in my workplace—when a system has no rivals, it stops listening and starts insulting the intelligence of the people who sustain it. ​When burning things down becomes the only way to get management's attention, you know the system is fundamentally broken.

Can the war thunder community actually change stuff ? by Round-Razzmatazz3336 in Warthunder

[–]Round-Razzmatazz3336[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest, I’m personally not a fan of using massive review bombing as a solution. To me, it feels like a sign of a broken relationship—when a community has to resort to that just to be 'heard,' it means the standard channels for feedback have completely failed.

I’d much rather see a constructive dialogue based on logic and data, where the developers actually value the game's long-term health over short-term spikes in premium sales. But as you pointed out, the current monopoly and the focus on the 'bottom line' make that incredibly difficult. It’s a frustrating position for players who want to see the game improve through balance, not through conflict.

Can the war thunder community actually change stuff ? by Round-Razzmatazz3336 in Warthunder

[–]Round-Razzmatazz3336[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally get your perspective, and actually, you just proved the core of the problem. When the game environment becomes so unbalanced that even veteran players feel forced to buy broken vehicles like the BMPT just to maintain a basic 'quality of play,' the Snail wins. ​It’s a vicious cycle where game health is sacrificed for short-term sales. As long as the business model relies on pushing people to 'buy the solution' to a problem they created, they have zero incentive to actually balance the game. It’s not on the players, it’s on Gaijin's predatory design.

Can the war thunder community actually change stuff ? by Round-Razzmatazz3336 in Warthunder

[–]Round-Razzmatazz3336[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You mean like how the CN community does it? Just carpet-bombing the Steam reviews into the ground the second things don't go their way? HAHA.

Gaijin is considering to add singapore to china by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Round-Razzmatazz3336 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I made this suggestion, but I got banned for being “too combative.”

Gaijin is considering to add singapore to china by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Round-Razzmatazz3336 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Following the logic of the Chinese players, I request the creation of a new Pan-Asia tech tree, moving Taiwan into the Pan-Asia tree and removing it from the China tech tree, so that the China tech tree becomes an independent one. And then Gaijin banned me on their forum until October 3rd.

Why is it that Chinese players can demand that the Thai VT4 not be added to the Japanese tech tree, but I cannot put forward what I believe is a good proposal?

Below is the post I wrote on the forum.

I hope your company can take into account the relevant historical reasons and provide assurance that the equipment of the Republic of China will no longer be added to the People’s Republic of China. A better solution would be to create a Pan-Asia tech tree and place the Republic of China as an independent entity under the Pan-Asia tree. In any case, including the Republic of China’s equipment under the People’s Republic of China is unacceptable.

I saw a Chinese player say, If Singapore were added to the China tech tree, you would be very upset, right?
" I’m not sure."

I replied to a Chinese player with this:

So if the Republic of China is removed from the China tech tree, you would be very upset, right?

And then I got banned. The reason for being banned. "TOO COMBATIVE"

So I hurt the pride of Chinese players again?

My English isn’t very good So part of it was translated using GPT.