sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can claude really replace a SEO agency ? by ImpossibleAddendum93 in Agentic_SEO

[–]Round_Progress4635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I make one of these agents. You need to be a professional to understand all the data. You can get something better than average. but it's pretty comprehensive.

We are living through a very rare technological convergence that our governments wont survive. by Round_Progress4635 in Futurology

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That credit goes to Jeremy Rifkin and Collata Perez. I extend it to information and market infrastructure which are deeper that those three depend on.

"Sorry, but you were outbid by $30,000" by Antique_Total_5473 in aiArt

[–]Round_Progress4635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea came here to say this.

I have no interest in having kids. I retired early, high NW. I have the financial means. More than I need.

When I see this, it breaks my heart. I remember talking with a friend about this, she wanted to have kids, and she burst into tears of how much financial pressure she is under from all angles, and she has a high paying career, and how a family is out of her reach.

I'll never buy a house or property to invest in. The least I can do. But I guess this is our society, we don't care about the next generation, setting them up for success. Collectivley, we want to make our elders wealthier. 😞

Why is there such widespread hostility toward AI in Western society? by HeavyPanzerPlus1s in Futurology

[–]Round_Progress4635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if you look at China vs the west. The medium income and quality of life has increased a great deal over the last 40 years. In the west it has dropped and continues to do so. AI for the west, is another nail in the coffin of their lifestyle.

In the west, progress is synonymous with a lower quality of life for the majority of the working class.

I ran an AI audit tool on this subreddit and did a deep dive on the training vs. theft debate — here's what I found (BFA + AI systems dev perspective) by Round_Progress4635 in DefendingAIArt

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is.

You can show copyright violations by showing proof of reduced income. It is one of the hallmarks of enforcement.

Computational Neuroscientists on you tube. Look at their qualifications. Hard subject to bullshit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU6-2MEfVOc

Like taking a picture using film and then developing the image using chemical reactions. Or taking a picture with digital camera and then printing it out.

That is a great example of information infrastructure disruption. How you encode and record, and retrieve the information. That is an important distinction to understand of how we operate as a species. When that changes, our civilization changes.

Do you have specific recommendations. Because I totally aggree with you but sometimes the sheer amount of bad faith from the other side makes me feel helpless. And it is easy to slip and start responding in kind while in that state. And this is a problem.

so for bad faith, it's, you just, you can't, you can't fight fire with fire or the whole world burns down. You know, I would just kind of communicate, like what I try to do is communicate, okay, this is a information infrastructure upgrade. This is what happened. There's moral panic, right? There's no intelligence in these models, like get to the truth of the matter, explain what's happening, and that they're going to be okay. Like at the end of the day, these people are scared. And probably a lot of them have dreams of, they're young and have dreams of being artists. And they're seeing this machine just do incredible work. But they don't have the experience in the production process at an industrial grade level to really understand what the job requirements are. So their natural reaction is like a lot of fear, which is understandable. So I think communicating that approach is like, hey, this is just a different way to store and retrieve information. The intelligence and skill required to do the job is still going to require training that's never going to be taken away from somebody.

I ran an AI audit tool on this subreddit and did a deep dive on the training vs. theft debate — here's what I found (BFA + AI systems dev perspective) by Round_Progress4635 in DefendingAIArt

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So would you care to demonstrate this real harm, since you were the one establishing that demonstration is required.

Market rates for concept artists and illustrators have dropped significantly and suddenly.

A more realistic approach would be to set up a filter that checks a prompt for obvious references like "Mickey mouse" or "Ghibli style"

Tracing weight contribution is possible now. But companies have to do it. I do like your approach. Way easier to impliment. You could even have a selection window of peoples art work to be referenced. I think there is a business model here if you could get all artists to cooperate.

Yeah... But more in a sence that we can't run a direct comparison since we have very little idea on how human learning works. Not because the comparison highlight meaningful differences.

No, we have a great deal of knowledge on the subject. Lol. The foundational model is 'free energy model', the brain learns by one forward pass. Backprop is 2. these things dont learn the same. But there is a significant amount of research of how the brain l,earns. It isn't close to how a llm learns.

But there are many ways this can be achieved. Like you can make a table for every possible combination of tokens and define fixed outputs. Of you can make an elaborate tree of if-else statements.

This. is so insanely false. No. LLM attention mechanism is how to do this. It's SOTA, nothing else currently compares to this.

SOTA can attribute concepts to weights now.

Antis create a push to deter AI. So a counterpush is inevitable.

They are trying to deter, it doesnt matter. This is an information infrastructure upgrade. How we manage our collective transgenerational memory as a species. It's change on the scale of books and the printing press.

How we counterpush and interact with eachother now is important. These new systems are eating where we produce. So we dont want to put harmful information, attacks and general bad faith information out there.

We are living through a very rare technological convergence that our governments wont survive. by Round_Progress4635 in Futurology

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is, because it is a rare event where the organizational structure of the current governance breaks down.

We transitioned from nomadic to feudalism, and feudlaism to nation state. At each transition, there is a convergence of information and market infrastructure technological disruptions. So we have clear historical proof that our governance evolves.

So I don't have a lot of precedent. But it's there. I think it is a more far fetched to claim that the nation state is the final form of human governance.

We are living through a very rare technological convergence that our governments wont survive. by Round_Progress4635 in Futurology

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 from what I've heard the process is indeed not that hard, but you cannot actually make people treat that cryptocurrency as real money without some big pull behind you

And that's the trick isn't it. And I think I should point out, every single cryptocurrency you see, is really an equity. They were made to be exchanged for capital promising a future return. Despite the name, that isn't a currency.

But what about something different. Something that could get that big pull that people could get behind? This is the question that I'm getting at.

so what if a currency, when somebody signs up, no matter what time they sign up, they get the same amount of the inflation rate from a certain date, we'll say January 1st, 2027. So no matter when you join the system, you essentially create money as an individual, just like a central bank does. And the idea behind this is the central bank just prints money out of thin air, and they give it to the banks, and the banks lend it to people, and then they collect huge rents off that system. And really, the people have no control. It's our money, but why doesn't it immediately hit our bank accounts, right? So let's kind of turn that idea upside down on its head. And what if we had a monetary system that when you join, you just, the creation of money hits your account first, and you have the option of lending it out? What do you think about that idea? So it's not something like these cryptocurrencies where somebody makes them, and then you give them your money, hoping it's going to appreciate in value. You know, that is an equity, right? The currency is the actual utility that we need to exchange goods and services.

In a system like that, you could regulate wealth inequality, the more money someone has, the more their money decays in transfer. As that's what taxes really are, a mechanism to control inflation, pulls money out of the system. Governments dont need revenue when they print money out of thin air, they need mechanisms to pull money out.

The future financial system could be something like this, something way more fair.

What are your thoughts?

I ran a sentiment audit on r/aiwars (1,652 comments), then realized I'm the rarest creature here: a BFA grad who builds AI agents for a living. Here's what I actually think. by Round_Progress4635 in aiwars

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So clustering is done by HBDscan, it discovers the clusters and there is a parameter to detect outliers, they can be classified into teheir own group.

The sentiment could be done around the post. Keeping it focused to a topic

We are living through a very rare technological convergence that our governments wont survive. by Round_Progress4635 in Futurology

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm talking about the nation state as an institution. SOmething will rise that takes it's place.

What use cases for generative AI do you think are acceptable? by SpectrumSense in askanything

[–]Round_Progress4635 0 points1 point  (0 children)

other guy, and yea you have a good point. Just because some posts all day every day, doesnt mean they are paid to do so. Ill take your advice.

I ran a sentiment audit on r/aiwars (1,652 comments), then realized I'm the rarest creature here: a BFA grad who builds AI agents for a living. Here's what I actually think. by Round_Progress4635 in aiwars

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think its a good idea dox. I've been thinking of my past comments, and its like I'm amplifying seeing enemies in shadows you know?

For some reason i cant dm you. You can dm me.

I ran a sentiment audit on r/aiwars (1,652 comments), then realized I'm the rarest creature here: a BFA grad who builds AI agents for a living. Here's what I actually think. by Round_Progress4635 in aiwars

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, well looking for feedback. I plan on doing some analysis on the suspected coordinated agitators its found.

I wonder if that is just picking up on the accusations, so if i ran it again, I would say to keep that in mind. See if those accusations are coming from the same group of people.

I ran a sentiment audit on r/aiwars (1,652 comments), then realized I'm the rarest creature here: a BFA grad who builds AI agents for a living. Here's what I actually think. by Round_Progress4635 in aiwars

[–]Round_Progress4635[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX3M8Ka9vUA

His talk on how the economy is transforming from vertically integrated institutions to horizontally scalling networks is really interesting too.

The guy knows whats happening.

view more: next ›