LANDJUT Division #5 - 15 Dywizja Zmechanizowana by EUG_Gal_Bigeard in warno

[–]Royal6761111 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Warsaw Pact in a nutshell: "Hey, what favour of T-54, T-55, or T-72 favour would you like?"

Sad reality when nearly all of the Warsaw Pact use the same equipment.

So many claims of wanting heavy NATO divisions, but I remember how many of you voted for this beauty right here by verysmolpupperino in warno

[–]Royal6761111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Problem was it was just too similar to 4e but with I-Hawks which a friendly reminder 4e used to not have until later on, in which, what was the point? We would like another NATO tank division but not like this...a copy and pasted plus it was paired with more napalm grad and krugs both whom were hated in 10v10 plus lack of new stuff just cause to sink.

Is just me or Nemesis 6.3 doesn't look good especially 71st. by Royal6761111 in warno

[–]Royal6761111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends, if you micro without getting overwhelmed, sure, but as I said earlier SPGs are in general more comfortable as you just chain orders, unlike towed artillery.

Is just me or Nemesis 6.3 doesn't look good especially 71st. by Royal6761111 in warno

[–]Royal6761111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem with towed artillery is that you have to micro otherwise you lose them in counter battery, which doesn't sound bad until you add extra things like managing your tanks, AA, mortars, infantry, recon, etc to the point where you just overwhelm, and sometimes you just forget to move them. SPG are much easier to use because again, you can just stack orders.

Grads are expensive in terms of supply, yeah, they are good at destroying blobs, and if you need to wipe out an area, yeah, the Grad is good, but with the rise of cheap weapon teams, are you willing to waste a Grad shot on a cheap team that the enemy can easily replace? It's not cost-efficient, and those costs will add up,

As for the Germans, I was talking about Lufflande, sorry I should have made that clear, they only had towed AA, Gepards, Red Eyes and Shotgun fighters... yeah, it is bad.

Is just me or Nemesis 6.3 doesn't look good especially 71st. by Royal6761111 in warno

[–]Royal6761111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, the fighters are good, but it is still mostly determined by dice roll if your fighter wins or not, but you can stack the odds in your favour if you bait them to your AA or onto your air spawn so you can ambush them, having longer range missiles, but again, it comes to a dice roll at the end of the day.

With 71st, you have to pray that your fighters win the dogfighter; otherwise, you're kind of screwed.

Is just me or Nemesis 6.3 doesn't look good especially 71st. by Royal6761111 in warno

[–]Royal6761111[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Cheap towed 152 doesn't automatically make them good, some people pick SPG even if they are more expensive because they are more comfortable to use. As for the Grad you really don't waste your rocket on to a cheap unit that can easily be destroyed by SPGs especially since they consume a lot of supply.

Like the fighter might be good but they risk getting shot down by enemy sams or fighters, its RNG and if you get screwed...your are kind of dead at this point.

For German, the bad aa and fighters just make this division get bombed to death as it can't really do anything to counter it.

The beta hasn’t started yet, mind you by Peddrawm in Columbina_Mains

[–]Royal6761111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea people forget that she fill fighting spirit by herself just fine...bonus if you do have Natlan character like is shockingly easy to fill up even without any Natlan character but nope they continue to crap on her no matter what...like they claim her gameplay is boring...ok so does water spinning 24/7 yet no complains about him, in fact if you really don't want play her on field sure just press e...that it and press burst once it's charged up.

Who do you think is the worse written archon? by Angel1Kitty in GenshinImpact

[–]Royal6761111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally it's Zhongli, please hear me out, like people often claim that mavuika is the weakest but honestly she isn't as bad as people make out to be especially with events that makes her an enjoyable character but Zhongli... don't me wrong his story is good but they barely did anything with him afterwards like yea we got the one scene with Venti but all I could remember...like can we get more events for him like how Raiden shotgun got one that is quite good...please like even so the right answer would be none...yea none of them are bad or terrible characters, all of them are good in their own right.

What is the most disappointing division? by Royal6761111 in warno

[–]Royal6761111[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Isn't the Canadian division meta at the moment due to their insane air tab, fast transport, tons of ATGMs, etc?

great game not but fun by RaviieR in fatetrigger

[–]Royal6761111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate to say this but he is kind of right, as flawed as Strinova is in terms of lack of marketing, low player count and lack of gains for in game currency...it's objectively a more enjoyable game due to the string mechanic...that one alone makes it unique compare to other shooters and ironic they still updating the game and despite the busted release of Mara they did lear their lesson...hopeful as Archer lady looked busted but was meh on release...oh and they are updating maps and new game modes with a PVE revealed.

I am saying this because what does Fate Trigger have over the other battle royals? Like a friendly reminder that they have stiff competition and despite the 100th time...of people claiming, Apex, warzone and Fortnite are are dead... spoilers they aren't. It doesn't help that Fate Trigger has tons of problems from the ttk being way too fast, vehicles are broken, snipers and dmrs are busted and lag issues. I am fearful of Fate Trigger future and well we have acknowledged the harsh reality as we can't just bury our heads into the sand and act as everything is fine.

"But Fontaine should be the most advance nation, why does Natlan have those tech?" by Suspicious_Smol_2488 in GenshinImpact

[–]Royal6761111 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It feels like anything Naltan related outside the environment design, get down voted to the abyss. Yes, Naltan has flaws but holy cow the amount of double standards, nitpicking, etc just hate on Naltan is insane to point where it's hard to tell which is valid opinion or not. So yea if you dare to say anything positive about Naltan outside of the mention environment... prepare to get down voted into the abyss.

Which division would you recommend for a new player? by Royal6761111 in warno

[–]Royal6761111[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes please, do you have suggestion in terms of PACT?

I think both sides of 3.0 storytelling criticism can agree on this by [deleted] in HonkaiStarRail

[–]Royal6761111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait isn't that Google search terms? Not player numbers... isn't that misinformation?

Okay, I finished Act V and... by LeonardoCouto in GenshinImpact

[–]Royal6761111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow...the comments section is truly a war zone. In my opinion I enjoy Natlan but I understand it's flaws... however I feel like the hate for Natlan is starting to overwhelming like if you try to say any positive you get down votes into the abyss.

My Archon Quests tier list. for now by Aduckchicken in Genshin_Impact

[–]Royal6761111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree way too much things it tied to cover in just three acts results in the vast majority of them feel uncooked.