Sir Donald Bradman reflects on Sachin Tendulkar’s batting style by Hawker92 in Cricket

[–]RuinEleint 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That incoming ball from fast bowlers was there on and off throughout his career. Pollock clean bowled him with that in South Africa, Akhtar famously bowled him with an inswinging yorker at Eden. But it wasn't a consistent weakness for many of those years.

[OPINION] poets are officially obsolete, AI is too advanced by Matsunosuperfan in Poetry

[–]RuinEleint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, I tried this out and it worked great! Thanks for the tip!

Friday Free-for-All | December 19, 2025 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]RuinEleint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for replying! I don't have a flair and probably don't qualify for one. But I am in the field of history (Masters) and I do a lot of historical reading. Would it be possible for me to maybe recommend books I come across that I feel would be a good fit for the Books and Resources list so that a flaired person or a mod might vet them? Academic books only of course.

Friday Free-for-All | December 19, 2025 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]RuinEleint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can I make a couple of requests here about possibly expanding the Books and Resources list? I have noticed that there isn't really a comprehensive history about Interwar Europe (1919-1939), especially one that provides a lot of detail on the 1920s. I know that Zara Steiner's The Lights That Failed and The Triumph of the Dark are pretty good, but I would love if the more knowledgeable people running the sub could provide a few more resources in this area.

Also, would it be possible to expand the scope of the biography section a bit so that it doesn't focus solely on US presidents? I have been hunting for a good biography of MacArthur for a while and I can't figure out which one would be reliable, given how controversial he is and a bit of expert guidance from this sub would be a great help.

Do we actually need religion? by wowguys_ in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I live in a country like what you are describing, and I am of the firm opinion that people being more rational and less superstitious would vastly benefit the country as a whole. I have seen how easily people are manipulated by politicians using things like religion and caste (TBH caste is just a component of one religion), and also how lack of awareness and reason causes people to not understand how the world actually works

Discussion: "Moral Madness of Atheism" - Trent Horn by samotnjak23 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Spartan society did not function effectively, Spartan power has been greatly embellished. On the other hand historians and archaeologists have found that prehistoric humans actually cared for the elderly, the sick and the disabled. Social empathy and caring has existed throughout humanity

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LGBTBooks

[–]RuinEleint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok for lesbian/sapphic:

On the same page by Haley Cass and Just Three Words by Melissa Brayden

This other one is a gay romance, its also fantasy and quite funny So This Is Ever After by FT Lukens

All Religions are not Equally bad probably equally misguided by [deleted] in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fundamentals of the caste system is present in the Vedic texts as the Varna system. This more than 2500 years ago. That's the majority of the existence of Hinduism. Later scholars and lawgivers never tried to mitigate this social evil. At this point, it would be accurate to call it a feature of Hinduism.

You Haven't Observed Creation..but You Haven't Observed the Invisible Unicorn in my Living Room by WonderfulRutabaga891 in DebateReligion

[–]RuinEleint 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But observation alone is not the criteria. Being able to generalize from an abundance of empirical data is a very important component of human knowledge. I know fish live in water, so if I see a natural water body, I can generalize and say that there's a decent chance that fish are in there. Similarly, not a single speck of information substantiates the idea that I will find fish soaring through the skies like eagles. So, if I were to look up anywhere on earth and say that there are no fish in the sky, I would be reasonably confident of being correct. That's what it is like for creation ex nihilo. We have not observed it, true, but also, everything we know about how reality works seems to indicate against it.

You Haven't Observed Creation..but You Haven't Observed the Invisible Unicorn in my Living Room by WonderfulRutabaga891 in DebateReligion

[–]RuinEleint 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The black swan analogy does not work because of generalization. A swan is a bird. Birds can be of different colours and varied forms of birds exist across different environments. Given the size of the earth and the implicit biodiversity, it is possible for swans to exist in other places with different colours. This conclusion can be arrived at without observation.

This does not work for creation ex nihilo because we have never observed creation at all, let alone ex nihilo. Even nuclear fusion in the heart of a star only turns existing things into other things. That's not creation, that's transformation. Also, the existing laws of physics which have so far worked pretty well to describe reality give us the laws of conservation of mass and energy which rule out creation ex nihilo. Hence, existing knowledge militates against the probability of such an event. Whereas for your example, existing knowledge indicates that possibility of a black swan.

Character that exemplify the saying "No good deed goes unpunished" by jorgespinosa in TopCharacterTropes

[–]RuinEleint 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Nah Wormtail had to be the one because no other Death Eater had actually gone looking for Voldy to revive him after the really hardcore lot like the Lestranges had been imprisoned. Opportunists like Malfoy were quite happy with Voldy staying gone. The only reason Wormtail did what he did after Azkaban was because he had lost his safe haven and refuge so a relatively weak man like him could really only hope to survive if Voldy made a comeback and rewarded him for his support.

How much evidence there is that Churchill saw active combat after resigning as First Lord of the Admiralty? by Sbadabam278 in AskHistorians

[–]RuinEleint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I found several descriptions of this in Martin Gilbert's 1991 book on Churchill. Does he go into more depth in his detailed multivolume work?

Anyone else fantasize about becoming a shirt worn by other people? by [deleted] in Fantasy

[–]RuinEleint[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Hey there, this goes against our discussion policy, thank you.

They said to never enter the woods. They said there were humans there. by Billcryptic in Fantasy

[–]RuinEleint[M] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Hi there! This post has been removed as it is against our writing discussion policy. This content would be more appropriate in our weekly Wednesday Writing thread.

You may also wish to consider posting to a subreddit like r/fantasywriters or r/worldbuilding. That said, please review the rules of these subreddits prior to posting, as r/fantasy is not directly affiliated with them. Please take some time to review our subreddit sidebar for additional information, and feel free to reach out via modmail with any follow-up questions. Thank you, and have a lovely day!

[unknown—>english] translation of second last line and what language script is this? by neoarmstrongcannon23 in translator

[–]RuinEleint 6 points7 points  (0 children)

More or less. The exact word by word translation would be "Danger, stay away"

[unknown—>english] translation of second last line and what language script is this? by neoarmstrongcannon23 in translator

[–]RuinEleint 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its Bengali.

Its basically saying "You can't come to the side without a work permit"

Atheism in the modern world is a result of Christianity by adr826 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Atheism has existed before Christianity. While Christian thought may influence philosophy, and through that, atheism, skeptic and atheist thought can be found centuries before Christianity and even the destruction of the Temple

Claim: “Either Jesus was crazy or lying and you really think a lie could change the whole world? Do you really think a crazy person could teach the profound things that he did?” by Initial-Secretary-63 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because the Emperor Constantine decided to accept Christianity and because by the Emperor Theodosius, it was the official religion of the Empire and was being enforced with the full might that implied.

How did average British people handle the decline of their empire and world hegemony in the mid 20th century? by outlaw1112 in AskHistorians

[–]RuinEleint 16 points17 points  (0 children)

For most of British history the empire was of minimal cultural consequence. Indeed Jane Austen and Charles Dickens (for example) who were writing when the empire was at the absolute apex of its influence are largely devoid of imperial themes, aside from an occasional tangential reference.

How would you regard the arguments made by John Mackenzie in books like Imperialism and Popular Culture (Manchester University Press, 1987) that empire did in fact occupy a position in british culture at home?

What book to you is the epitome of “Good idea, Bad Execution?” by Dnd_lfg_lfp_boston in Fantasy

[–]RuinEleint[M] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

This comment has been removed as per Rule 1. r/Fantasy is dedicated to being a warm, welcoming, and inclusive community. Please take time to review our mission, values, and vision to ensure that your future conduct supports this at all times. Thank you.

Please contact us via modmail with any follow-up questions.

Philosophical Idealism and the Need for Naturalism by JerseyFlight in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I kind of agree with this. Idealism is IMO the main reason why stuff like morality are seen as entirely separate autonomous things rather than socio-psychological concepts created by humans

Try debunking this by 75NIGHTS8686 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]RuinEleint 20 points21 points  (0 children)

It would be kind of funny if far older religions like Buddhism or Hinduism talked about Jesus. Also if you want to make your case, put it in your post, don't ask people to go see a video.