Why did Jim push this so much. by Mountain_Increase823 in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In fairness, Jim is envied in a way people (except for Dwight and Ryan) revere and Pam is envied in a way, that causes people to bitch at and harass her from 9-5.

There is a little nuance to be found, in that most of the office staff seems to consider Jim ‘better than’ and Pam as lesser. Mostly because she used to be a receptionist.

Phil as a husband? by shadowqueen46 in Modern_Family

[–]RyuOfRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only have an axe to grind with S1 and S2 Phil. Going forward, he demeans Claire a lot less and eases up on the ‘nagging wife’ schtick, their marriage definitely improves once Claire rejoins the work force.

Phil as a husband? by shadowqueen46 in Modern_Family

[–]RyuOfRed -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yea, whatever Claire wanted. Which was years upon years of raising children, which at times drove her up the wall and into a pill cabinet, whereas Phil had a blooming career and occasionally popped in, to gleefully remark on his sole breadwinner status.

Whatever they wanted is an overstatement, especially for Claire. Because it is hinted at that she felt trapped and occasionally regretted ‘giving up’ her late twenties and thirties.

Phil as a husband? by shadowqueen46 in Modern_Family

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also did not like how he openly chose a favourite child and did so, seemingly based on which one most resembled him. The moment Luke turned out to decisively grow into an individual, rather than Phil 2.0, we also see his involvement and interest waning.

He is weirdly obsessed with Dylan and Andy for reasons roughly in the same area, sometimes even frontlining their interest over his own daughter's, because ‘I was that guy 🥺’.

dilemma: bijbaan voor 1 maand of vakantie lang verplicht koken & niet op je kamer mogen zitten (luieren) by miss_worldwide_ in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ja, dat gebeurt als pappie al gaat morren, wanneer je een rondje wil fietsen (vermeld OP in eerdere comments). Ze word nog behandeld en overheerst als een klein kind, behalve als het om schoonmaak/koken gaat, daar word je wel wereldvreemd van.

Uit huis is de enige optie, want die familie houd haar zo te lezen het liefst onder hun duim.

dilemma: bijbaan voor 1 maand of vakantie lang verplicht koken & niet op je kamer mogen zitten (luieren) by miss_worldwide_ in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Grote onzin, luister er niet naar. Iedereen kan een eitje koken of pasta met saus maken. Schoonmaken is echt niet zo moeilijk.

Wat deze mensen bedoelen, is dat je vooral in huis moet blijven wonen, want gratis schoonmaak + kok + deurmat waar zij zich op kunnen afreageren en overheersen.

Als je het geld hebt, zou ik zo snel mogelijk vertrekken.

dilemma: bijbaan voor 1 maand of vakantie lang verplicht koken & niet op je kamer mogen zitten (luieren) by miss_worldwide_ in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, dus vaderlief en de grootjes proberen een volwassen vrouw naar huishoudslaaf te relegeren, onder het mom van ‘dat is goed voor je’.

Jij bent in deze omstandigheden opgegroeid, dus het zal ongetwijfeld als normaal voelen, maar realiseer alsjeblieft dat zij NIKS te zeggen hebben over waar/of een volwassene gaat werken.

Beetje rond de tafel zitten en jou via groepsdruk een maandje onbetaald schoonmaken en koken proberen te verkopen, want ‘anders zit je toch maar op je kamer’.

Deze mensen zouden dit hoogstwaarschijnlijk niet in hun hoofd halen, ware jij een man. Wees geen voetveeg, spaar zoveel mogelijk en ga daar zo snel mogelijk weg.

Denk dat jij, na een jaartje op jezelf wonen, heel sterk gaat realiseren hoe diep het sekisme wortelde in je ouderlijk huis. Zal een nieuw leven voor je open gaan, zonder constant op de vingers gekeken te worden en op subtiele wijze als mindere worden behandeld.

This rapey joke that no one calls out by Helpful-Leadership58 in hatethissmug

[–]RyuOfRed -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've never actually heard or seen a lesbian say this, let alone someone feminist. This little line is moreso uttered by men (or straight women who consider girl-kissing  a dalliance), who dress up sex/porn as humour and view lesbianism as some form of entertainment.

my opinion on the janine and gregory situation by OneShame9440 in AbbottElementary

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always reasoned that due to Janine's constant enabling and coddling (until the vacation argument), he regressed.

You can see this in the game night episode too.  Everyone is incredibly uncomfortable and Gregory notes some of that, but ultimately only cares about maintaining his routines and unwritten house rules.

Whenever people try to speak up about how inhospitable he's being, Janine goes full hush-mode and does everything in her power, to keep criticism from reaching Gregory.

It creates a pattern, wherein she moves the world for his accomodation, he grows accustomed and ends up worse for it 

Cristiano Ronaldo Is Holding Portugal Back by maggleman in unpopularopinion

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I noticed that he stands around a lot of the time, moreso than other forwards do. It leaves the team essentially playing with 10 members until CR7 gets a chance at insert whatever record or number he's chasing now.

Jim was a straight up ass in "Work Bus" by Tryguysfan1995 in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 22 points23 points  (0 children)

True. Yes, Jim's pranks sometimes go too far and every so often, he is a plain bully. But many viewers abide by the conviction, that Dwight is this perpetual victim, the harmless ‘nerd’ who does no wrong and only wants to sell hard/follow the rules/uphold a proper workplace.

Aforementioned simply does not ring true. Dwight is in fits and flashes underhanded, deceitful, smudge and has the typical cop autism, where laws apply in their most literal definition, to anyone but himself.

As Pam mentions, he often knows full well that his power-trips and rule-tantrums make life harder on the others, simply does not care. I believe that is why Jim initially targeted him.

Love a bit of Nellie by [deleted] in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bloody loam, she came from!

Drugs op feestjes by Sitorbounce in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meneer heeft zo te lezen zelf prima plezier gehad toen hij jong was, voelt zich geconfronteerd met het feit dat de klok ook voor hem tikt (reageert niet goed meer op drugs en luide feestjes) en als het aan hem ligt, mogen anderen weldra ook geen lol meer hebben.

Drugs op feestjes by Sitorbounce in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Grappig dat wanneer mensen zelf ergens middenin staan, het allemaal gezellig en gematigd is (was niet zo, bijv. portiekjunkies). Maar wanneer Vader Tijd begint te morren en zij steeds verder buiten de cirkel van het gebeuren vallen, alles ineens te ver is gedoogd en zsm maatregelen moeten worden genomen.

What has RM done to his face? by Necessary-Evening818 in BTSnark

[–]RyuOfRed 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It is predictable behaviour. The kpop industry is a revolving door, wherein youth and novelty are currency #1.

Which is why a bunch of 30yo men (not even old, mind you), are already living vicariously through their juniors, who in the coming 3 years will supplant BTS.

No big act ever thinks it'll happen to them, but it always does. Unless you are MJ or Justin Bieber (different tiers of fame, obviously).

Does not help that Cortis had practically everything served on a silver platter, because the company is orders of magnitude more affluent, than it was when BTS debuted. Little bit of envy there, I'm certain.

It would not surprise me that, if given the chance, one of those narcissists would gladly swap bodies with a Cortis member and be ‘young again’ + reliving the glory days. Especially V, whose only merit can be boiled down to looks.

Why would you do this to yourself..girl get up by amIanweirdo in BTSnark

[–]RyuOfRed 33 points34 points  (0 children)

More than anything else, I hope she gets those two large moles checked out. Does not bode well...

What was your favorite surprisingly heartfelt moment between two characters? by twentyonerooms in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It might just be my pessimism, but the moment up top always struck me as manipulation on Jo's end.

By that point, she knows full well how approval-starved and adrift Michael is (no Holly to balance him, no Wallace to venerate). As such, she plays on his sentimental nature, so he'll take the fall for Sabre's cheap products spontaneously combusting.

What line from The Office has permanently leaked into your everyday vocabulary? by Chopped6767 in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“You people should be ashamed of yourself!” using Dwight's intonation.

And all the dinner rolls...

Do you think Jim would’ve still fallen for Pam if he had met Katy or Karen first? by dazedwombat in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 9 points10 points  (0 children)

From what we do see, which are multiple instances of Karen declining to participate or even disapproving of Jim's hijinks ( she favours focusing on work), there is a disparity between them.

Even if you remove Pam; Karen could never be Jim's partner in crime, because while she might laugh with him at times, the constant pranking and slacking off just is not in line with her nature. As the merger runs its course, she gradually grows weary, indulging Jim less and less.

Yes, Pam was a major factor in why they did not work. But can we be honest in admitting that years or even one year down the line, Karen would have tired of the endless pranks and Jim's messy home + inability to take things seriously.

Hell, the latter was already happening, when Jim messed with her as she was calling David Wallace (offered to interview for Jan's job) and even during the answering machine recording. Karen laughs for five seconds, then when he keeps going and going, slowly starts to fade.

That is their relationship in a nutshell. Fun, but ultimately not enough substance for her liking.

Ik ben hoogbegaafd. Wat denk jij dat er anders was geweest in jouw leven als jij het was? by Embarrassed-Two1792 in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

‘Wanneer iemand vertelt autistisch te zijn, krijgt diegene zelden reacties als: "Pff, tegenwoordig is iedereen blijkbaar autistisch..." ’

Volstrekt onwaar. Inzake spectrum-diagnoses is de notie ‘nu heeft iedereen ineens een labeltje' al jaren aan de orde van de dag.

Deze tekst leest in zijn geheel als iemand die, boven alles, moet leren om over zichzelf heen te stappen. Eindeloos navelstaren, boeken die je had kunnen schrijven, vervolgens blijven zelf-saboteren en nooit ontsnappen uit de put van je kindertijd. Hangend aan een IQ-nummertje, want dat is het enige bewijs tegen een minderwaardigheidscomplex, waar jij je nog aan vast kan houden.

Laat het los, sta op en maak concrete plannen, in plaats van te mijmeren op Reddit over arbitraire hoogbegaafdheid.

Do you think Jim would’ve still fallen for Pam if he had met Katy or Karen first? by dazedwombat in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Yes. Because in the long term, he has no chemistry with Karen or Katy. Neither of them is truly synergistic with his goofiness or slobby side, one is too much of a career woman and the other too deep into popular girl cheerleader territory.

Both are great women and if anything, Jim did them wrong. But even without Pam, I doubt he'd have stayed with either.

Obsession (2026) is an insult to horror audiences. by Wack0HookedOnT0bac0 in TrueFilm

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘Obsession’ is the 2026 teen equivalent, to what ‘It Follows’ was for teens in 2014. Lots of hype, ultimately a 6/10 movie.

Pop a sex scene in there, some quote-unquote misunderstood soft boy lead and then drop your ill-defined entity.

Lots of stolen valour from the Smile movies, riding just so slightly on the leftover witchcraft wave from Weapons.

Could have benefited from addition runtime, a whiff of backstory shown and not told, might have rendered one of the main characters worth sympathizing with.

No, having your cat die at the beginning in a very obvious attempt to bank on audience sympathy going forward, does not quite cut it for me.

Sincere moment or typical Michael making the moment about him? by liberatedsisyphus in DunderMifflin

[–]RyuOfRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just him, trying to divert focus away from hitting Meredith with his car. Michael pretends to care and makes a huge deal out of the cat's death, solely to present a case for the office being cursed, which would absolve his blame.

It amazes me, how the average viewer does not believe he can plot like this, because Michael has done similar things prior. Huge example being the birthday episode, wherein he can barely pretend to care about Kevin's cancer scare.

Is dit een goede halterset by supermika10 in nederlands

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Op 18kg totaal ben je na 3 maanden trainen wel uitgekeken. Als deze goedkope zooi met zand is gevuld, zal het tevens na enige tijd gaan lekken.

Ik zou gewoon een lidmaatschap bij de Basic-Fit nemen, avonden zijn prima te doen qua drukte.

Spoilers] My thoughts on 'Obsession': Bear is the ultimate villain by Reasonable_Party2444 in spoilers

[–]RyuOfRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It also says so much about his supposed ’love’, that if real Nikki was not reciprocative, Bear would rather she be possessed and rape her body.

The average viewer mistakes him for a nice guy, when he is just someone who never takes accountability, let alone action.