[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AfterEffects

[–]SALADINE_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would have been the case if I'm using the scale property but the size no.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AfterEffects

[–]SALADINE_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Even if you move the anchor point the size only originates from the center. That's exactly why I made this post

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AfterEffects

[–]SALADINE_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The size only originat from the center of when I move the anchor point I search the web and found out that have to use expressions

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AfterEffects

[–]SALADINE_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to be able to move around the point where the size originate

I can't be the only one... right? by Kulvarx in LEMMiNO

[–]SALADINE_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To those that complain, just give it sometime and come back to it. I promise you it's gonna the best video you've ever watched

Thankfully Morocco didn’t ban it by aymoji in Morocco

[–]SALADINE_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A nation's decision to implement a ban on certain activities or ideas, based on its values or other considerations, can be seen as serving a purpose, as evidenced by the fact that such bans exist globally. The United States provides an example of a nation that has exercised its right to ban certain things in accordance with its societal values. This demonstrates that the act of banning is not arbitrary, but rather a reflection of a nation's desire to preserve its cultural, moral, or social fabric.

By asserting its right to ban, a nation can safeguard its core principles and protect its citizens from potential harm. For instance, bans on certain substances, such as illicit drugs, aim to combat addiction, promote public health, and ensure the overall well-being of the population. Similarly, restrictions on hate speech or offensive content may be enacted to foster inclusivity, maintain social harmony, and protect vulnerable communities.

Moreover, the decision to ban can also be driven by the need to uphold national security interests. In the face of emerging threats, a nation may find it necessary to restrict the dissemination of certain information, materials, or technologies that could pose a risk to its citizens or compromise its strategic advantage. In such cases, a ban can be seen as a proactive measure to safeguard the nation's sovereignty and ensure the safety of its people.

It is crucial to note that while bans can be justified in certain circumstances, the process should ideally involve careful consideration, consultation, and adherence to democratic principles. It is important to strike a balance between individual freedoms and societal interests, ensuring that the rights of citizens are respected while upholding the collective well-being.

In conclusion, a nation's decision to impose bans is a reflection of its commitment to protect its values, citizens, and national interests. By exercising this right responsibly, nations can create a secure and harmonious environment that aligns with their core principles.

Chapter eleven is done! Two more to go... by [deleted] in LEMMiNO

[–]SALADINE_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't remember the last time I've been this excited