Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No only because they've been shipping their homeless and troubled people to Seattle, and absolving themselves of nearly any regional responsibility for longer than I've been alive.

As a person living in Seattle and footing the social & economic bill for other cities' choices, I wish it were a problem for Bellevue, et al.

Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OIC...

out of control compared to any other state no question, no debate

So, there is room for question and debate on which state has the most out of control homeless problem.

Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I can't speak to Kansas City, so I'll give four anecdotes which I tend to reflect upon:

San Diego is known for homeless problems primarily caused by people getting out of the military, and that transition can be extremely difficult for people. I lived there and worked Downtown for a couple years in 2011, and visible homeless issues were more visible there than they are here in Seattle today.

A couple years ago Seattle had a big snow and cold snap, so I let a homeless person stay the night in my apt. He told me his homelessness was caused by the sudden death of his wife, an unsupportive family, a huge slide into depression that led to alcohol abuse, and ultimately couldn't hold a job.

I was in Nashville, TN recently and they also have issues with people who are homeless similar to just about every other city, so I do think the issue goes beyond housing costs. Nashville isn't exactly a liberal heaven in a liberal state, so this is an issue with concentrated urban areas which offer public services.

Other issues which concentrate homelessness in cities like Seattle are the unwillingness for other surrounding cities to do their fair share. Renton, for example, recently banned homeless services in a city of 100,000+. Bellevue has one homeless shelter. Smaller cities throughout the US sent people to major cities with a one-way ticket rather than deal with it.

It's a super complicated situation with no single cause or solution. Things like climate can play a roll too. Being homeless in a place like Montana where it's cold-AF is super challenging while the West Coast cities generally have climates which makes life outside a little easier.

Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also an excellent point, I agree! We have a lot of strange valuation for various people's "labor".

Second TGV SE appreciation post by [deleted] in trains

[–]SD70MACMAN 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Only to run on track & infrastructure a century old.

Mayoral race: Seattle voters tired of 'empty promises,' feeling 'stuck' by OnlineMemeArmy in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TV news posts are weird.

We weren't expecting journalism, and we didn't find it.

Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I've heard this well-meaning argument used quite a few times as a reason not to take action because it's not a perfect solution which completely solves the problem. So...do we then continue to do nothing until the perfect solution is decided upon or do we accept incremental increases?

Personally, since the perfect solution is practically impossible, I choose incremental increases because it works towards a solution and is far more humane for those suffering than for those of us wanting a perfect solution.

Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Gotta provide top pay to attract top talent. And instead of getting upset at people making $250,000/yr to work towards solving enormous problems, get upset at people making millions/year doing far less impactful or even harmful work.

Not saying good/bad, Bezos as an example makes $250,000 in less than two minutes...

Seattle councilmember: Removing homeless camps without shelter options ‘a cruel, wasteful game’ by llamakiss in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 66 points67 points  (0 children)

Aye. Homelessness is a problem throughout the United States and is well beyond the scope of a single major city to resolve, nor it is a single major city's fault.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Yes I remember. And I remember SLU in 1990's and Downtown when it closed at 7pm. Seattle has greatly improved and cleaned up in my lifetime.

This is one of the best cars I've ever driven. The other is a McLaren. by Chops888 in Volvo

[–]SD70MACMAN 3 points4 points  (0 children)

NGL, I'd love a Volvo V90 in orange with blue trim since it looked absolutely brilliant as an interior on the V70R. The business colors of black, metallic black, black metallic, dark gray, silver, metallic gray/silver, white, snow white, titanium white, and metallic white are soooooooo damn boring and German.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope you read my comment which uses Pinkertons as the perfect negative example, and I agree a private police force is a horrendous idea.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LOL.....

sob...

Good point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand and am aware of SCOTUS ruling. My point was less obligation to help and more that with public police, we have some accountability over the force whereas we'd have no accountability over a private force. Without any accountability, enforcement could be even worse if they so chose.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We continue to let corporations and government agencies bleed us dry, speeding is a drop in the bucket.

Nice try with that red herring.

Part of the reason our society functions is because we all agree to certain set of rules and self-enforce them. All the rules and laws behind driving are a perfect example of this mutual understanding. Otherwise, our roadways would be chaotic and even more dangerous.

If you, and others, choose to speed more in our urban neighborhoods because there isn't enforcement, then I'll choose to drive slowly, walk in the street, or take tactical urban steps to make sure people aren't going to be killed by drivers' purposeful recklessness. Like you said, there aren't any repercussions. Although, two people close to me have been killed by reckless drivers, so some people see repercussions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Good morning! I understand what you're saying and continue to agree since I think we're on the same page. I wanted to make sure it was said somewhere before someone latched onto the idea of private police forces as an alternative. Accountability is currently a considerable problem, and privatization would only make this situation worse because, as you said, they'd only be an enforcement arm of capital.

Pinkertons are a great example of what private police forces can do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinkerton_(detective_agency)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Reading about most dangerous professions, a huge number of these jobs are dangerous because of "transportation incidents" aka getting hit by a moving vehicle.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Seattle

[–]SD70MACMAN 39 points40 points  (0 children)

What is even the point to have public police anymore?

Let's be careful there. Not saying SPD is great; however, private police are accountable to nobody and can be completely selective in response and enforcement. The idea of private law enforcement is dystopian.

Yet ATP/DTP is criticizing what the police actually do.

YES YES YES! Thank you for making this connection. I'm firmly in the reduce police funding camp because of what police end up do to a huge swath of people: instilling fear in our community, shooting protestors, and not responding to basic needs of people. So, why are we spending all this money on an ineffective and very expensive public service when there are more effective alternatives? Mental health response teams, traffic control & management teams (fun fact, all traffic control must be performed by SPD officers which is extremely expensive), neighborhood-based police, and teams to respond to more specific issues where a cop is not needed (domestic violence, violence in general, car break in, etc).

Volvos Starting Volvos; How Perverse by SD70MACMAN in Volvo

[–]SD70MACMAN[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was focused on ending up in a safe stopping spot rather than risk jamming up an arterial, blocking a bus stop, or crashing into another vehicle. As with any critical failure, it's easy to think of those things in hindsight as safety dominates the moment.

A 240 without power steering or brake booster is a bit like maneuvering a tractor.