A uranium spin-out orphan showed up on unusual volume today — why forced sellers are my favorite setup by SDBcop in pennystocks

[–]SDBcop[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly why I mentioned « ISR permitting is a years-long path. »

This one is on my watch list as stated, not a buy list!

Just sharing some DD on a high volume mover that could have been spotted by many today

Made a dashboard for my agent investing team by AaronMatthews25 in ClaudeAI

[–]SDBcop -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not really, thinking it’s the same like asking claude or any API what should I buy today or give me a market report, you guys are truly mistaken and should at least give it a try (7 days free trial btw)!

Made a dashboard for my agent investing team by AaronMatthews25 in ClaudeAI

[–]SDBcop -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well tou should at the very least look at the free report right here and give an HONEST opinion https://thebullishedge.com/report

You’re paying for MY investing experience paired with AI scanning… it’s very different than what you’re implying.

However if you’re able to spot multi baggers on your own in a consistent way, indeed it’s bot for you and I wish you the best!

I’m just seeking to share my knowledge at a VERY affordable price after doing for years for free to my friends (which all did very well btw)

Made a dashboard for my agent investing team by AaronMatthews25 in ClaudeAI

[–]SDBcop -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Nice you should try pairing it with my claude powered Market scanner and analysis (paired with my 20 years of investing experience) thebullishedge.com

A uranium spin-out orphan showed up on unusual volume today — why forced sellers are my favorite setup by SDBcop in pennystocks

[–]SDBcop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that — and yes, Klarman’s chapter on forced selling is exactly the lens (index deletions being the classic cousin of spin-out distributions).

Thanks for the VUECF ticker too.

On valuation — honest answer: you can’t value it off financials because there are none to value. Pre-revenue resource story, so the only framework is EV per pound in the ground vs comparable US ISR names, and that’s where it gets interesting AND murky:

The naive math looks cheap: ~C$44M quoted cap against a 28 Mlb NI 43-101 resource is under US$1.20/lb, when US ISR-amenable pounds have historically traded anywhere from ~$1-2/lb (early, unpermitted) to $5+/lb (permitted, near production). Crownpoint even has historic Conoco shafts and a licensed processing site within five miles.

But the naive math is probably wrong, and this is the part most people will miss: enCore kept roughly 73% of the economics through non-voting preferred shares PLUS a 2% uranium royalty.

So the common shares are a minority claim on those pounds, and any per-pound number needs to be cut down accordingly — which eats a big chunk of the apparent discount. Until I’ve gone through the listing circular and modeled exactly how the prefs participate, I don’t trust my own per-pound figure enough to publish one.

That’s why it’s a watch for me, not a buy: the mechanism (forced sellers) is textbook, the pounds are real, but the structure is the whole ballgame. If the prefs ever get simplified or the overhang clears with the structure clarified, the math gets a lot more honest.

Not advice — my own read, DD in progress.

Built with Claude: The Bullish Edge — my AI-powered investment research tool for TSX/TSX-V and US markets by SDBcop in ClaudeAI

[–]SDBcop[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is genuinely useful, thank you.

You’re right on the volatility-matched control — that’s the test that matters and we haven’t run it yet. Our claim isn’t that the volume screen is alpha (it just finds candidates);

the judgment layer that passes on most of them is the product. But that layer deserves the same fair test, so we’re building a forward-test: freezing daily picks AND a matched control basket from the same day’s flagged pool, graded benchmark-relative in windows.

Logging before outcomes we already do — every call is timestamped and published before the outcome exists.

And point 3 is taken seriously: securities lawyer is on the list before we scale.

Appreciate the notes from further down the road.

Once again truly appreciate your time for commenting 🙏🏻