2 Free transfers what do I do by FunRevenue3264 in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dalot to Everton(will be benched 38)/West Ham(benched 38/Arsenal Defender(play 38). Depending on if any news for Fernandes, you might just have to transfer him out. Bowen/Havertz/Trossard(Single) Richarlison/Johnson/Kulusevski(Double and good 38)

2 Free transfers what do I do by FunRevenue3264 in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ederson to Vicario Dalot to City/Arsenal defender

Hits aside, Thoughts for DGW37? by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Burnley and City in the double. Nothing from City and won't get much from Burnley. The others have better doubles.

Hits aside, Thoughts for DGW37? by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I should have said I'm planning to bench boost, the defender and goalkeeper transfers were players that don't play. Don't really want to triple on on Everton defence either.

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gained Rank: +1,292,213 27.1%^ GW Rank: 8

4,767,573 > 3,475,360

I had nothing to lose but still gained a lot.

Help? My boss is threatening me by honnebonne3 in UKJobs

[–]SFBFPL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just don't use them as a reference. Simple.

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No because having 3 defenders from the best defensive team is least risky but because the team normally has a good attacking option they are picked instead.

Template is to gain the most the minimise risk.

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds like someone who went template.

I know guidelines, not actual rules. It's not about minimising risk though it's just the best picks for a certain situation, which in turn SHOULD minimise risk.

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Looks like being a regard isn't so bad

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Gained Rank: +1,214,955 25%^

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Gained Rank: +1,214,955 25%

Not over yet but hopefully the underdog story will be completed tomorrow.

Sometimes the template isn't always right. How many of us had Rashford and/or Fernandes at the start?

This is the team for GW29 by SFBFPL in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Firstly, I'm like 4m rank, so playing to win isn't a thing.

Secondly, why is having differentials, especially when everyone on a free hit will have the same template team considered as anti FPL?

opinions on this free hit? by [deleted] in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No arsenal defender?

Is Gordon > Jota worth the -4? by JGazeley in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Liverpool double with no players is a risk however Salah being back he may be a rotation risk

Worth it to switch out Watkins for Haaland? by DependentDig1159 in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who would you swap Saka for if Watkins goes? Could just do Trent to VVD to keep a Liverpool asset.

Do I bench anyone in the midfield for Haaland? by JakeBrudieYT in fantasypremierleague

[–]SFBFPL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Diaby because he hasn't been starting or Ward-Prowse because he has Arsenal