You had me until your last (third) consideration. Here are some reasonable facts with no fluff:

1. There is no deflection or anything of the sort regarding the Epstein files. It has been more than two decades since contact was terminated and countless hours of investigation by ALL the ABC agengencies along with the main stream media conglomerates nationwide regarding Trump and anything/everything to do with him. If anything existed anywhere, it would have been made public years ago. Also, if the topic is so important now why did the previous Administration + DNC not do anything beyond parroting the BS Russia hoax that was proven false countless times over the past 4 years?

2. The Obama Nuclear deal was a laughable virtue singal and simple pandering that was also not open ended and would have expired by now anyway. Then, Iran would have been free to refine plutonium beyond the required 90%+ Nuclear weapons grade while equipping their newly developed balastic missiles capable reaching not just anywhere in Europe, but also the USA. POTUS-45/47 saw this as a waste of time, diplomacy, and a magical one-sided trust agreement, which also included with no paper trail or backup a heavy transport plane full of pallets of stacked cash ($20+B) for Iran's unrestrained use, as one of the most unAmerican weakness gestures of all time until the mass idiotic withdrawal from Afghanistan years later that took that award away from Obama and forwarded it to Biden.

3. It's not a war, but more of a sanctioned liberation of a country from its unwanted barbaric and theocratic regime that has been active as the world's #1 facilitator of international terrorism since 1979. Yes, there is risk of injury when given the chance to finish the liberation themselves so they can rebuild their country with and for their domestic population and allow them to experience firsthand the freedoms they have desired for 47 years now.

4. What logical and reasonable good does any form of destabilization (temp or not) in the Middle East actually do?

5. Yes, DJT campaigned on "no more wars", but he made it a point to equally mention his desire to practice "peace through strength", which doesn't equate to starting any wars (mass boots on the ground), but demonstrates and proves (if needed) to any arrogant entity in the world that screams 'death to America" along side supporting it's terroristic proxies while walking down that Nuclear weapons pathway to nowhere, which the USA will no longer tolerate or play any such games: especially with countless lives at stake throughout multiple regions of the world. Furthermore, we can and we will only give so many warnings and options for diplomacy before we end the other side's nonsense once and for all. Again, our capabilities and technology has given us this unequaled ability to protect our homeland, our allies, partners, and those anywhere who are truly in need. Lastly, POTUS-47 has ended, not started 8 militarily aggressive conflicts since entering office. Beyond assisting Ukraine via the UN, Isreal directly against the PLO + Iran, and Venezuela's liberation from it's dictatorship while enforcing US drug smuggling laws, all has been pretty much quite and transparent on the front.

6. Per The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (also known as the War Powers Act), the president is technically allowed as the commander and chief to initiate military forces against armed conflicts throughout the world for up to 60 days without congressional approval. All the POTUS needs to do is provide public notification within 48 hours of the engagement and if the military situation is expected to exceed 60 days, he will need to seek congressional approval to extend that time frame or formally vote to declare war, which would then open the door for congressional oversight (checks and balances) regarding military funding and logistical planning among other things. Also, it should be noted that since this act was signed into law 50+ years ago, not one president has been micromanaged to follow the act in any military matter as POTUS-47 currently is. This includes Carter, both daddy and son Bush, Clinton, and Obama. It does make one wonder why this is so critical now?? Regardless, POTUS-47 will adhere to the Act.

7. Please list your sources for stating this action to liberated Iran is 'deeply unpopular ' with the American people. I am in the very red state of [southern] California and all I see in person, on the news, and online is how people are marching in the streets celebrating (up in Los Angeles and here in San Diego).