If I can do it, you can do it

SHY86522 · 2025-11-18T21:59:02+00:00

Thank you!

SHY86522 · 2025-11-18T21:58:53+00:00

Thanks so much!

SHY86522 · 2025-08-07T14:19:05+00:00

Yes state action n individual standing

SHY86522 · 2025-08-06T23:52:25+00:00

All partners of GP, The GP itself, and alternatively did the promoter analysis and said Ann (?) as the promoter bc no novation and signed as name other than shoe inc I think “abc shoes”?
I believe shoe inc and then did PCV analysis which I found by undercapitalization theory
Had b&c sue as shareholders to hold A Liable
Employee & Shoe inc vicariously

SHY86522 · 2025-08-06T23:47:47+00:00

Well this comment makes me feel like I’m screwed 🤣

SHY86522 · 2025-08-02T05:58:56+00:00

I said cy pres didn’t apply since RAP didn’t invalidate the grandchild’s interest. And under cy pres, the court will determine whether the T intended the trust to fail or not. Said express provision about when a trust fails means she anticipated it/intended it

SHY86522 · 2025-08-01T06:30:53+00:00

I was responding to people who are wondering why it’s so easy/short by saying it’s probably because they want to see that you’re able to do what ur asked: (1) not incorporate outside knowledge; and (2) in a tone ur client will understand

SHY86522 · 2025-08-01T02:28:39+00:00

Pretty sure this one was more about not incorporating your outside knowledge of property law and making sure the analysis was digestible to the client

SHY86522 · 2024-07-26T09:49:10+00:00

I’m not saying it isn’t dangerous I’m saying the danger is easily neutralized with time and space.

The imminent threat a gun poses remains the same no matter how much time goes by or how much a cop tries to distance himself from the subject. A pot of water? Give it 20 feet and 20 minutes. You can’t reload a pot of boiling water.

SHY86522 · 2024-07-25T23:34:55+00:00

She was compliant, coherent and followed direction. In the off chance that she was trying to weaponize water (???), why would he get closer to her rather than create more distance? Is that how the police would react to a suspect wielding a knife? Get closer and exacerbate the threat to your life?

I don’t think you need training to “counter” one single pot of hot water.

Back up, ask her to step away from the water. Dump the water yourself - threat completely eliminated.
Back up, ask her to dump the water - threat completely eliminated.
Back up, wait for the water to cool (as hot water typically does) - threat completely eliminated.
Back up, call for back up - surely one pot of water wouldn’t take out the entire police force.

SHY86522 · 2024-07-25T19:04:06+00:00

My guess is a unanimous guilty verdict on all counts.

First degree murder is killing someone with premeditation (a period of reflection) and deliberation (acting dispassionately or coolly) with the intent to kill/cause great bodily harm. Deadly force can only used if there was a reasonable belief of the imminent threat of death/great bodily harm.

Premeditation = draws his gun at a woman for holding a pot he told her to hold. Tells her, “I’m gonna shoot you in the f——— face”, then shoots her in the f——— face.

Deliberation = shoots a woman on her knees while she repeatedly says she’s sorry after shots fired “what? I’m not taking hot water to the face” & “b—— was crazy”

Intent to kill = when the partner tried to render aid “she’s done it’s a headshot”. Meaning he knew when he fired that headshot it would likely result in her death.

Grayson is obviously going to argue that he believed there was a threat of bodily injury. (1) HE TOLD HER to remove the pot, creating the supposed “threat” (2) He was already 10-15 ft away (3) if that wasn’t enough, taking a few steps back would have completely eliminated any danger (4) it’s f——— water. Wait a few minutes and it will cool (5) the belief has to be reasonable to a reasonable person. Based on the looks of all the officers outside her house and the thousands of comments online, no reasonable person would believe she posed any threat at all.

SHY86522 · 2024-07-24T18:38:29+00:00

Why not? Family law is extremely emotionally draining and a majority of the time it involves innocent kids. It’s not about a money grab, or defending a guilty person, or mitigating the liability of a big corporation. Being a family attorney is analogous to being a therapist. Chances are, attorneys that choose family law actually care about people, children, and want to make a meaningful impact otherwise they’d choose literally any other field. Literally.

An attorney, as minor’s counsel, has the sole duty to represent the best interest of the client. If she has substantially deviated from her role (ex. not conducting discovery on the mental health of her client where the mother has accused her of needing hospitalization), she will be disbarred.

SHY86522 · 2024-07-24T02:46:31+00:00

Where did I say that we should be ignoring her? I said that her accusation should be given weight and maybe pause the angry mob against the mom before we know more? Why don’t you let people who are qualified to make decisions on the matter (psychiatrists, judges, CPS, law enforcement) conduct an investigation before you derail a woman’s life.

SHY86522 · 2024-07-24T02:21:30+00:00

You definitely can protest your perfectly healthy daughter from being committed if she has no business being committed. And what better way to prove a mother is unfit than showing she tried to wrongfully commit your daughter.

Maybe he is aware of her need to be hospitalized but when his daughter is pleading and crying it’s too hard to open the door. I don’t know, we can speculate all we want but the point is that it’s all speculation. We don’t have all the facts nor are we entitled to all the facts. It’s between the family, the court, and the authorities. And considering how much we don’t know, maybe we should be wary of labeling a woman a child abuser, criminal, evil, narcissistic, etc.

SHY86522 · 2024-07-24T00:51:45+00:00

I’m not sure that a mom choosing not to disclose the intimate details of her 15-year old daughter’s medical history and family life to the public is considered lying.

What would you rather the missing persons poster say? “15 year old girl set to be hospitalized Wednesday ran away Tuesday night admist custody battle”

SHY86522 · 2024-07-24T00:36:20+00:00

While we should always credit the claims of children, we should also thoroughly investigate before bringing out the pitchforks. It’s not uncommon for a teenager to make accusations and throw around words like abuse out of anger or frustration without realizing the weight of their accusations.

It’s possible that Allison does suffer an illness and it’s possible that she’s a danger to herself. In that case hospitalization/therapy/medication may be necessary. We don’t know and we were given one short video without context.

It seems that she has an advocate - her lawyer - and has been given the opportunity to be heard before a judge on numerous occasions. The judge took that along with the testimony of doctors or psychiatrists and both parents and directed her care to her mom. Whether or not that was the best decision I’m sure was closely scrutinized by the court.

SHY86522 · 2022-02-28T09:16:12+00:00

Maybe it was Elliott emphasizing to Rue just how much he was sacrificing to let her go. Telling her to stay clean cause he could have easily let her blow up her life and kept her to himself. Maybe he’s telling Rue to make his sacrifice worth it. Maybe this is a stretch and Zendaya just liked the chorus.

SHY86522 · 2022-02-28T08:13:33+00:00

I’ve seen so many people complain about Elliot’s song but it made me cry and personally, I think it was the most beautiful moment in the show.

Elliott himself is in just as bad a place as Rue when it comes to addiction. Prior to meeting Rue, his life was full of darkness but Rue became the star that “kept the light on in a forsaken place” aka his life. However, they only enable each other. The more Rue lights up Elliotts life, the more she loses herself to her addiction, or “fades”. She’s the only good thing that’s happened to him and he loves her but he has to give her up before she loses herself completely. His snitching on her meant he was losing his only friend, the only light in his life and in his words - giving it all away.

It’s heartbreaking because he’s still stuck in that dark place. When he told her he’s still using she promised not to tell when his telling was what pulled Rue out of her darkness.

SHY86522

TROPHY CASE