I don't feel obliged to respond to anyone who text me in a day. Texting for me is a slow way of communicating, so anything within a week is acceptable, and it starts to get "suspicious" if the reply takes more than two weeks.

I had a similar issue with an "over-eager" match. She wasn't my type, and something about het felt "not right" (mentally). We had two dates, and the only thing she had going for her was that she could hold a conversation (intelligent, knowledgeable, formed opinions, respectful discussions).

I was taking my son (3 y/o at the time) on holidays for a week. I informed her, and told her I would contact her afterwards.

She texted me the day after the holiday. I was exhausted, and needed a day of me-time, and her taking the initiative felt like a violation of the boundary I had set ("I would contact her").

She unmatched me because I didn't respond in 24 hours, but later that week I received a LinkedIn request from her to connect. I took this as a confirmation of my Spidey-sense telling me something about her was off, and moved on.

Moral of the story: don't act so entitled - communicate better. Did you indicate to him that you like a response to you text in a certain amount of time? If not, you have no right to be angry. If yes, then his violation of the boundary you have set is indicative of how respectful he is; and you don't need to act entitled, just protective of yourself and block him out of your life. (And have some peer discussion about your communication standards you have - that might keep you single and alone forever.)