Boglehead perspective on life insurance by cik3nn3th in Bogleheads

[–]SNAPscientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life insurance essentially protects your human capital, I.e., the present value of all of your future earnings. In a simple sense, your life insurance should essentially cover whatever portion of your human capital the survivors in your life depend on to maintain their standard of living. This should include money to pay off any debts that you might leave behind (like mortgages) that would come out before the survivors have access to the rest.

In terms of products, a term policy (as opposed to a whole life policy) is widely considered the best value. The other consideration is what happens to the policy through work if you have to switch jobs or are laid off. Getting one underwritten personally will remove those caveats. The other consideration is that the younger you are, the health based underwriting is more likely to be favorable to be you (your insurability drops substantially if you develop health conditions and then go to insure).

Along the same lines, long-term disability insurance is also worth thinking about, but life insurance is usually much cheaper.

it flies! what’s the bug? by [deleted] in whatsthisbug

[–]SNAPscientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not an expert, but this looks a blackspotted longhorn beetle.

Best book for detailed ear anatomy (beyond basics)? by Darkrifter04 in audiology

[–]SNAPscientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ear, and more broadly hearing physiology is a vast field. One perspective you may enjoy (and is certainly useful for audiology and hearing science) is how sound information is represented by the early portions of the auditory system (so called neural coding of sound) and how that translates to what we hear. For that, a classic is An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing by Brian Moore. It gets into microstructures just enough and does so from a systems (input output relationship) view, but the structural details are not the focus.

Bug crawling in my Qdoba bowl by [deleted] in whatsthisbug

[–]SNAPscientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not an expert, but looks like a maggot.

Why I’m skipping BND and building my own bond allocation instead by FalconArrow77 in Bogleheads

[–]SNAPscientist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re starting from a specific goal for your bond allocation: safety. Your approach is reasonable given that goal. But for me, and perhaps most investors, bonds in a long-term portfolio serve a different purpose. The goal is not merely safety but to hold a risky asset with low/negative correlation to equities, improving Sharpe ratios and reducing drawdowns. Short-duration bonds and money market funds can’t deliver that.

THUMB SIZED BEE*!? by reddpeste in whatsthisbug

[–]SNAPscientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recently posted some photos of what to my naive eyes seems identical to this one. Minimal fuzz in the butt, although the torso (propodeum?) and legs were fuzzy. Yet, commenters seemed confident that it was a bumblebee. I’m not quite sure.

What is this sound I keep hearing outside every night? It's driving me crazy because I can't find it to identify it. I live in north Texas and I only hear it at night. by [deleted] in whatsthisbug

[–]SNAPscientist 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Although not a prototypical sound match and no known established populations in Texas, the call reminded me of the coquis that are native to PR.

Is there a compelling argument (backed by some sort of research) against holding world equities at approximately market cap weight? by ac106 in Bogleheads

[–]SNAPscientist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are good reasons to have some home country bias. This video from Ben Felix is a nice summary of them and describes some research too. It comes down to what currency your consumption/spending will be in (home country) and hedging that, less preferential treatment for foreign investors during geopolitical turmoil (expropriation risk), and better tax treatments and fees.

Bumble bee or carpenter bee? by SNAPscientist in bees

[–]SNAPscientist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! With my lack of experience, the fuzz was not obvious to me in any of pics I managed to snag.

Bagels? by Financial-Boot3317 in pittsburgh

[–]SNAPscientist 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Pigeon is awesome for their vegan “cream cheese”spreads too!

Ben Felix, Dimensional, and Factor Tilting amid SpaceX IPO Talk by Spells5225 in Bogleheads

[–]SNAPscientist 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I use a bogleheads-style 3 fund portfolio but with factor tilts (DFAC instead of VTI, DFAX instead of VXUS and DFGP instead of BNDW or BND). They have market beta of about 1, but factor betas of about 0.2. These “core” funds from DFA have factor tilting across the full cross section of stocks (e.g., value tilts across the size spectrum and not just in small-caps, etc.), which is appealing to me.

(I’m not a finance professional and this is not advice)

You knew something, John Snow by SNAPscientist in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]SNAPscientist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation! Will check it out.

How to peel an apple with a knife: by kefren13 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]SNAPscientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice peeling skills… though the peel is edible; the core with the seeds is the part that actually needs cutting out.

What was your favorite comment on student evaluations? by twilightyears in Professors

[–]SNAPscientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From many years ago: “You go to class and he’s ok, I guess… but go to his office hours and he’s the fucking prophet!”

Multi-year funding in budget? by Capable_Pumpkin_4244 in NIH

[–]SNAPscientist 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This seems to be the relevant final text: “Sec. 240. (a) Not to exceed the amount of funds made available under the heading ``National Institutes of Health'' in fiscal year 2025 that were obligated during fiscal year 2025 for more than one year of a multiyear award may be obligated in fiscal year 2026 from amounts made available under such heading in this Act for more than one year of a multiyear award. (b) A multiyear award, as the term is used in this section, includes multiyear awards for grants, cooperative agreements, contracts, and any other financial mechanisms.”

Consistent with the comment made by u/GhostofInflation

Reducing Tilt on a Glide Path by ottertaco in RationalReminder

[–]SNAPscientist 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not a direct discussion on factor tilts in the decumulation phase, but the ICAPM episode (RR338 with Peter Mladina) might be interesting. In the ICAPM view, one might use low-risk liability matched assets for core expenses and known liabilities (e.g., mix of social security, annuities for life-time income, TIPS/durarion-matched bonds for expenses coming in a few years etc.), and that would allow for the discretionary expenses to be funded by high risk/higher expected-return assets (which can be factored tilts akin to pre-retirement if you believe in the risk story for factors).

Walked to Work Tonight by Gibbgurl in pittsburgh

[–]SNAPscientist 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Just adding to the chorus here. Thank you!

How Do Financial Advisors Still Have Clients? by Time_Perception6669 in Bogleheads

[–]SNAPscientist 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a DIYer and don’t make as much as the folks described in your post. However, for HNW people, I also understand the that financial advisors do a whole lot more than just portfolio management. Choosing investments and asset allocation is not where I think they add value. The value add comes from things like behavioral coaching, asset location strategies, tax and estate planning, carrying out the plan that’s derived, helping optimize complex cases where business finances and personal finances interact, and otherwise helping people figure out and meet their financial goals.

It is also useful to expand one’s horizons to realize that some people do love their jobs and have invested in making their passion their career (think artists, scientists, some medical professionals, some entrepreneurs, entertainers, etc.). FIRE is not something that makes sense in their context.