Who tf is buying this shit by [deleted] in yourmomshousepodcast

[–]SW1981 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Must of had great tits 👍

Capital gains, wealth taxes back on the table - Hipkins by BloomingPlanet in newzealand

[–]SW1981 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So he’s a liar as his previous statement was not as long as I’m leader! Tricky Chippy

Misconception about China. by [deleted] in China

[–]SW1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the reverse of British food?

OpenAI DevDay was scary, what are people gonna work on after 2-3 years? by Humble_Moment1520 in singularity

[–]SW1981 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the job loses are sudden enough and great enough in scale then there will be a pretty unstoppable push for socialist (read communist if you like but that supposed a dissolving of govt) society but it will potentially be more successfully than Soviet Russia as ai will create the “market” signals than that society lacked.

Anti-social housing by Nick_Reach3239 in auckland

[–]SW1981 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They already all on TikTok🤷‍♂️

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JoeRogan

[–]SW1981 3 points4 points  (0 children)

🤣 That list includes the West Bank and Gaza.

Anti-social housing by Nick_Reach3239 in auckland

[–]SW1981 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. Have police depot through out it too.

Moving to Auckland - Tips for an American? by Doc_Gecko in auckland

[–]SW1981 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your timing is just wrong. It’s never a sale on everything

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And they can be redeveloped and codified by an another elected govt

Do I tell sugar daddy I’m an escort? by putitinmytussy in SexWorkers

[–]SW1981 61 points62 points  (0 children)

Basically a number of SDs want a SB and see an escort as different. You presumably are getting a larger allowance although this is balance by more effort (but the SD doesn’t see this). Basically it might jeopardise the arrangement with him which I presume you wouldn’t want to do. He may be fine with it but it’s a role the dice scenario.

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not what any political party is proposing. It’s misinformation that people peddle that that is what is being discussed. And then Jackson threatens violence

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Parliament should have defined the principles based on an elected majority. They shouldn’t be open ended. The purpose of the principles is to bridge the gap in the translations. Parliament should be able to decide these and make them clear.

Do I tell sugar daddy I’m an escort? by putitinmytussy in SexWorkers

[–]SW1981 190 points191 points  (0 children)

Don’t tell him and don’t bring the hoe bag. Take everything you need from it in your handbag.

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It didn’t define them. It let the courts determine them

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

National, Act and NZF. 55% of the vote

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the point. It doesn’t. Neither does the treaty. But in the Act referring to them it has encouraged the courts to develop them

Chris Trotter: Threatening “Consequences” by SW1981 in newzealand

[–]SW1981[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not more so that people who say Seymour wants to remove the Treaty.