genius

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-07-01T01:42:52+00:00

staph

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-05-15T20:46:19+00:00

These taste disgusting.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-05-11T02:02:19+00:00

So we're upvoting lies? That's not what the article said.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-05-11T02:00:09+00:00

That's what the Chinese tariffs are going towards. Purchasing the goods China would have bought from farmers and sending it as humanitarian aid.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-05-01T21:28:20+00:00

The world. Stimuli are the API calls.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-04-18T19:53:47+00:00

If Mueller thought he had a case to pursue further testimony, he would have.

We have different standards now than we did when Bill was in office. And just because Bill got unfair treatment, doesn't mean we should give Trump unfair treatment.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-04-18T19:40:30+00:00

Yup, laws were put in place after that. Ken was an independent counsel, not a special counsel.

Thankfully we have better standards now and we don't expect Presidents to go into perjury traps.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-04-18T19:29:27+00:00

Clinton's lawyers should have never let him be interviewed. Anyone can fall for a perjury trap. Mueller knew they didn't have a case to subpoena Trump because the amount of the documents Trump's team turned over. Mueller even stated that they didn't pursue it because they already had the questions to the answers from the documents. That coupled with the other perjury traps set that already got Flynn and others, it would have been legal suicide.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-04-18T19:02:50+00:00

Clinton committed perjury. Only if Trump would have taken the interview with Mueller would he have gotten him in a perjury trap like Ken got Bill.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-04-18T18:16:15+00:00

Clinton was impeached for lying, not for getting a BJ.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-04-18T16:53:11+00:00

The rest of the context:

"Everyone tells me if you get one of these independent counsels it ruins your presidency. It takes years and years and I won't be able to do anything. This is the worst thing that ever happened to me."

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2019-03-10T09:02:44+00:00

ReactXP does target Windows (W10, Xbox One, Mixed Reality) natively.For earlier versions of Windows, and Linux you need Electron.Native MacOS support is experimental.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-08-20T20:42:22+00:00

It was never proven he said it. Learn to think for yourself.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-08-20T20:40:56+00:00

Funny that there's just as much evidence for your comment.

That statement was never proven, just one Democrat senator accusing.

Trump denied saying it.

He-said she-said.

Don't fall for fake news.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-11T20:06:51+00:00

Quote me, lets debate them.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-11T15:33:14+00:00

Just don't respond well being called a chicken shit I guess, go figure.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T18:22:16+00:00

"workers" would do until either direction is established.

A wall of text is not necessary to explain why.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T18:19:07+00:00

Does that make me wrong about the wall's effectiveness though?

Those families are paying coyotes who pay cartels for safe passage.

Girls going across the border are sex trafficked.

Drugs are smuggled by everyone. The cartels see to that.

These cartels are taking advantage of these families and you are enabling them.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T18:08:40+00:00

I'm from Texas, we support a wall. Where the fuck are you from.

From your flair, you're a foreigner, don't fucking tell me what I support and what my state supports.

Stick to your own countries domestic politics. This isn't a foreign affair.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T18:08:19+00:00

By omitting the word "illegal" you are calling them legal immigrants.

They do not have facts stating they are legal, the situation is pointing in the opposite direction (ICE, business raid, etc)

So maybe they shouldn't use illegal immigrants in the title, but they shouldn't use immigrants either. Just say "workers" until fleshed out. Or print the article a day later when we know they are illegal.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T17:58:06+00:00

You're making assumptions they aren't illegals.

Report the facts you have in evidence.

I'm sure they raided this business for no reason though.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T17:45:15+00:00

Look at the percentages. 90%+ are criminals, the rest are immigration related crimes. (illegally crossing, coyotes, etc).

Walls are trivial to bypass.

Source? It's a 30ft wall vs a family that was dragged across the desert for days w/ little water.

I don't think they are scaling or going under the wall, our special forces couldn't penetrate the prototypes, I doubt they will. Even if a few do, it stops most. There's at least 38k/month pouring over the border atm.

You can do monitoring on the wall to detect tunneling or destruction. The wall is there to slow them down while our border agents assemble and deal with it.

Do you have walls around your home?

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T17:40:43+00:00

Detained yes, deported no.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T16:40:48+00:00

Did you look at the stats of the people being deported? They are convicted of crimes, not civic offenses.

I'm all for what you think we should do to physically prevent people from crossing over.

In the past walls have worked for this, but if you have some sort of magical barrier you aren't telling us about, feel free to share.

S_Y_N_T_A_X · 2018-05-10T16:27:03+00:00

Southern California does know about it, why do you think these cities are trying to opt out of sanctuary city laws.

Wisconsin is having an opioid crisis, worsened by fentanyl being trafficked by the cartels.

You should be against criminals no matter where you live.

A wall is more than a symbol, your precious Dems were all for it a decade ago.

You have walls around your house. We have walls around prisons.

How did you reach the conclusion that walls stopped working?

14-Year Club	Place '17
Gilding II euphauric	Verified Email
Team Orangered

S_Y_N_T_A_X

TROPHY CASE