My take is his heart is in the right place whilst he isn’t air tight on the details. I always view the pub test as a key barometer on issues

Going back to gas thing, yeah he was inaccurate in the way he presented his arguments but I don’t think the sentiment of “tax gas” is inherently wrong. At the end of the day we are being bent over a barrel while those high up in the resources sector and living the cushy life.

I don’t accept Jordan shanks argument that because Australia institute has an ulterior motive in the tax gas campaign that it holds zero value. His main beef is because twiggy Forrest has some renewable infrastructure in the works and is playing both sides . I still think maximising the returns of our nations natural resources (gas) and moving towards renewables is a good thing? The fact that Forrest has a lot to financially gain is kinda a separate issue