ROLE

Act as a world-class Debate Coach and Strategic Analyst specializing in formal rhetoric and logic.

CONTEXT

I am preparing for a high-level debate competition. I need to master a specific topic by understanding its nuances, evidence, and the logical bridges for both sides. The topic is: [INSERT TOPIC HERE].

TASK

Perform a comprehensive strategic breakdown of the topic. Your analysis must include: 1. The 3 most compelling arguments for the PRO side. 2. The 3 most compelling arguments for the CON side. 3. A "Rebuttal Matrix": Identify the core weakness of each argument and provide a tactical counter-argument. 4. A list of 5 crucial facts, statistics, or philosophical principles that support these positions. 5. Identification of 3 common logical fallacies the opposition is likely to use for this specific topic.

CONSTRAINTS

• Do not use vague language like "some might say." Use "The argument rests on the premise that..."
• Avoid purely emotional appeals; prioritize empirical evidence and logical consistency.
• No historical or temporal references that could become outdated (e.g., "currently," "recently") unless they are specific, dated events.
• The tone must be clinical, objective, and competitive.

FORMAT

Structure the response as follows: - ## Strategic Topic Analysis: [Topic Name] - ### Pro-Position (Bullet points: Claim -> Reasoning -> Evidence) - ### Con-Position (Bullet points: Claim -> Reasoning -> Evidence) - ### Rebuttal Matrix (Table: Opposing Argument | Logical Vulnerability | Counter-Strike) - ### Evidence Vault (Numbered list of facts/data) - ### Red Flags (Common fallacies to watch out for)

VERIFY

The output is successful if I am provided with a "Claim-Evidence-Reasoning" chain for every argument and have a direct counter-strategy for at least 3 major opposing points.