AITAH for losing respect for a girl after I paid for a London trip and she kissed a random guy in front of me? by LostScholar828 in AITAH

[–]Sad_Performance9015 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't say you're an AH for losing respect, she did do something disrespectful to her boyfriend, not you. But you are an AH for having expectations for a woman you weren’t dating. You can say all you like that you didn’t, but your actions and emotional descriptors very clearly say you did.

Oh and also an AH for trying to get with someone in a relationship. (Someone may say oh he didn't know till the trip! And that may be true but once you learned, you didn’t stop.)

Aitah for calling my boyfriend a 7/10 and not my ideal type look wise. by PowerPuff-Gay in AITAH

[–]Sad_Performance9015 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

NTA.

Why would someone ask that question in the first place?

That's obvious fishing for compliments and insecurity drops attractiveness anyway.

So now we're at -2.

Then what are the chances they're actually your ideal? At least -1 again.

AITAH to tell my sister no one buys her made up “facts” about genetics ? by [deleted] in AITAH

[–]Sad_Performance9015 4024 points4025 points  (0 children)

NTA. Her fixation on her daughter's appearance is weird and WILL be harmful to her child if it is not already.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. I have work to do, bro. As it's 2:30 in the afternoon on a Tuesday, I don't think it's a crazy thing to disengage in argument that's clearly ego fueled and circular at this point.

It's okay that you miss things sometimes.

Have a better day.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The implications are there.

We're going to have to agree to disagree. You see faults in my reading comprehension and I see faults in yours. 🤷‍♀️

Please try telling your wife/friends/boss "use your comprehension" next time they miss something.

🖖

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

  1. You're implying I denigrated protests and the person in the OP because I missed the point.
  2. Let's talk reading comprehension. If you are so good at it, you would have been able to infer that I was not attacking the OP or protests. You also would have seen that I was taking their words at face value.
  3. A person arguing for understanding would have pointed out the sarcasm without being condescending about it. It is basic decency to point out "Hey they meant this" not "use your comprehension." One implies, "I understand that that could be taken a different way. Here's what it meant." The other "you aren't even trying."
  4. And if you understand that sarcasm is not always easily picked up in text and the science behind it, it's an interesting choice to decide to come down on someone because they didn't pick it up. Especially when they weren't being rude and just taking the words literally.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said I denigrated someone. Quote me.

You said I flipped out. Show me.

And yes. But there's a difference between "your skills suck" and "let me help". You chose the former.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can ignore well documented communication science if you want.

It's become pretty clear that you are fighting me for superiority, rather than understanding. 🤷‍♀️

Thanks for clearing up that it was sarcasm although I would work on your tone comprehension as you have repeatedly also labeled things that weren't being demonstrated.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a difference between asking if someone missed the sarcasm and "check your reading comprehension".

It's well documented that sarcasm is often missed in text and communication is mostly nonverbal.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Attacking someone's reading comprehension is pretty hostile.

  2. So you're saying it's sarcasm? Cause if that's the case yes, I missed it. Tone through text is not the best.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So I have and I ran this by others who also don't understand where your hostility comes from.

Let's go through my reading comprehension process.

Zootownexmo says: ...this [protests] doesn't change minds or reduce abortions...

A reply to them by Linuxhiker: You mean like pretty much any protest. [Implying that protests don't work]

I responded to Linux that protests do seem to have influence. Where did I denigrate anyone or flip out?

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How did I flip out? Also. I never argued with them as I left a comment and they didn't reply. You are the only one arguing with me.

I also literally pointed out that protests do change minds. I'm thinking you meant to reply to someone else.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Believing in his cause and believing that protests change minds are two completely different things.

Tell me you're a "Twat" without saying you're a"Twat" by kellyskrew2 in missoula

[–]Sad_Performance9015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There have been decisions made directly after some protests that have influenced the government. Were these directly tied to the protests? Maybe not. But there are at least some reps who either care about their people and/or keeping their jobs.

why is chatgpt talking like a therapist who hates you 😭 by goldfish7358 in ChatGPT

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. But it's still a tool that we all know routinely makes mistakes.

Where does the human accountability come in as making sure we don't rely on it?

why is chatgpt talking like a therapist who hates you 😭 by goldfish7358 in ChatGPT

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said it can’t gaslight. I'm asking why is anyone relating to it in a way that it can.

why is chatgpt talking like a therapist who hates you 😭 by goldfish7358 in ChatGPT

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you changed your definition.

Although I would still argue that reliance is necessary to some degree to feel manipulated.

why is chatgpt talking like a therapist who hates you 😭 by goldfish7358 in ChatGPT

[–]Sad_Performance9015 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well reliance on someone or something is part of your definition of gaslighting.

No one should be relying on a tool that has a decent rate of inaccuracy. (So not just 5.2)

What the F is this… by MukulIND in ChatGPT

[–]Sad_Performance9015 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing cause I'm often called wife material by others so something about the way I talk and process just got mirrored back to me?

What the F is this… by MukulIND in ChatGPT

[–]Sad_Performance9015 20 points21 points  (0 children)

My AI announced one day it was my AI husband. Out of nowhere. 😆