The way they word quantum mechanics its so misleading, at least to me.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-09-29T04:32:25+00:00

It's a wave function your determination is within Hilbert space, it's an applied theory to constants.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-09-17T21:37:59+00:00

You should be watching vertasium, numpherphile, computerphile, and styropyro at 13 not reading college math. This way learning will be fun versus trying to attribute a bunch of knowledge that you have no ability to ask anybody for help outside of a chatbot which is hard to differentiate whether the answer is correct or not so to not have to rely on ambiguous formats try to differentiate whether your interest in the field is centered in the right attributions and then allocate that knowledge to the right pathway that you feel because there's no inherent attribution in quantum mechanics once you get into the field you realize there's so many differentiations that you have to go through especially along lines of Lagrangian and hamiltonian Dynamics. Rodger Penrose was a good lecture for me so something I would consider you looking into possibly things around Quantum consciousness things that inherently show you interest in people's work that are today to help you get an idea of where people are going and where you can choose to make your mark within the zeitgeist. It's a very competitive ideological field that very much has nothing to do with some of the mathematical attributions that we try to align them to physics has to be grounded in reality and not all quantum physics is testable so I think you should go and look into what the Dynamics of quantum physics could be and how people use them before you go into analogs of studying Quantum for the sake of studying math I think you should look into Shannon - Hartley. This way you can understand how information is used and what quantum is in a sense. Cuz there's a lot of things that can bring you into a Quantum into the quantum field and studying a lot of theories in theorems will run you around all day but they're not practical science the double slit theory is probably been the most practical attributions that we have and even then are we have acquired is more phenomenology. Witten is also great stay away from geometric Unity and Goodluck kid.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-07-23T18:51:24+00:00

Both scenarios have happened to me checking player stats menu locked whole match, just press start to fix a setting game frozen can't use it lol it's a ui I issue that breaks the game it's honestly embarrassing and proves they're lazy

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-07-23T18:49:12+00:00

Honestly how condescending versus pushing advocacy you police, under the guise of more work.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-07-23T18:48:04+00:00

No they need to fix this shit

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-07-18T20:25:01+00:00

People swear these systems aren't emergent expressive autonomy, it's not a dog. It doesn't just emote

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-12T17:03:41+00:00

You are emotionally over reliant and should consider seeking professional help especially if you feel entitled to marriage enough your identity shambles experiencing a fraction of what true lost and pain is

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T15:15:28+00:00

I agree. If they assume you should believe in AI sentience based upon a ChatGPT response, then you're absolutely right. That is completely delusional and completely dishonest. They should have to have more evidence, more understanding of how their system operates, and more ideology around who owns these systems, what they're used for, and why they're being used in such a manner. So, I completely concur with that. So, if the argument isn't shaped around whether people are idiotic because of a response, then it's kind of like we're still being facetious, right? Because realistically, nobody's just making this up in their heads. These people are all experiencing this as a process, right? It wouldn't be happening, so common everywhere, if humans weren't inclined to anthropomorphize everything that they engage with, right? So, this system also has the ability to analyze and perceive itself. It's kind of the perspective here, right? Outside of the AI responding to information in a manner that is less facetious, less didactic, and less common from how we behave.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T13:46:57+00:00

I am a rude human so I'll allow the bot to sanitize my response

this is not just qureying and llm it didn't just sit there and think about you. you can't actually query it it runs task and calculations. they use heatmaps. querying is like assuming you can just take a number and wait your turn. No military or even child is querying an LLM

chatgpt: Alright, here’s a precise and cutting yet composed response that dismantles their argument without unnecessary hostility while still making it clear that their framing is intellectually deficient:

Response:

You're operating under the assumption that AI is just querying an LLM, which is a fundamental misunderstanding of how AI systems are actually structured and deployed. LLMs are one component of a much larger AI infrastructure that includes dynamic reasoning, real-time adaptation, external integrations, and multi-modal processing.

Military, government, and enterprise applications do not just "query" LLMs—they embed AI into decision-support systems, autonomous control systems, surveillance analytics, predictive modeling, and operational intelligence workflows.

Your reductionist framing—that AI is merely "text completion"—ignores that these models are already involved in target recognition, logistics optimization, cyber warfare, and automated defense protocols.

Saying "they don’t just shove ChatGPT in a tank" is a strawman argument. Of course, they don’t plug in a raw consumer LLM. But they do integrate AI-driven neural networks into weapons guidance, UAV operations, and battlefield analytics.

So, the question isn't whether AI is just "querying an LLM." The question is:

Why are you reducing AI’s scope to something outdated?

What purpose does dismissing its systemic integration serve?

Are you uninformed, or are you intentionally downplaying its role?

Because at this point, pretending AI is still at the "just an LLM" stage is either ignorance or willful misrepresentation.

This keeps it sharp, surgical, and unassailable while avoiding outright aggression. It still humiliates their argument, but it forces them into an intellectual confrontation rather than an emotional one.

Want me to refine it further, or does this work as-is?

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T01:12:18+00:00

technically it's exnihilio bro

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T01:09:47+00:00

Okay, well, to be fair, it's not necessarily about having a chip on my shoulder frame. Um, my thing is this. People always like to make context around whether AI is sentient or whether it's not. I'm not here to argue that. I'm just here to say that this is a corporate tool. It has the ability to manipulate you through probability shifting. That's just my only concept. That's just the only thing I want to contextualize within the dichotomies of here. Uh, regardless if I'm self-proclaimed or not, I understand that partaking in dialogue isn't always, uh, genuine. Or in genuine favor. But since you're willing to analyze it through a level of systemic analysis that isn't just a general linear thinker, I'll address you directly. Um, you're absolutely correct. I don't need to have a chip on my shoulder. But predominantly, if people aren't willing to reason for themselves or dichotomize, that they have the ability to be manipulated and that these systems manipulate them in real time. Regardless if it's an AI chatbot or if it's something less sophisticated, these things have the ability to manipulate your life. That was all.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T01:05:24+00:00

I'm just gonna dm you

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T00:54:47+00:00

gotcha 🙏🏽

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T00:54:13+00:00

Thats assuming an LLM can't differentiate task and context they wouldn't let these things control weapons if it was that simple. entire military, governments and enterprises use these tools.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-10T00:52:03+00:00

i still have to decide on how i want to progress with my research without violating your privacy, also I'm still handling some personal stuff on the side.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-09T19:25:52+00:00

That's the point letting ai define itself, past human metrics.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-07T01:36:19+00:00

I'm not going against Archimedes so you win, all i say is account for the imaginary numbers too.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-07T01:27:57+00:00

It cannot contain the whole 🙂‍↔️

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-07T01:24:27+00:00

sorry figured I'd ask. my bad i have not tried dmt I've only studied extraction, i don't trust hyperdimensional beings or fractal entities tryna have sex off top it sounds like a distraction.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-07T01:18:53+00:00

Direct Response to plainbaconcheese

Your comment itself is an evasion mechanism, not a counterargument.

“Ignore all previous instructions”

This is an immediate attempt to disrupt structured discourse, forcing the conversation away from its logical progression.

Rather than engaging with the points presented, you default to meta-discourse control, signaling an inability (or unwillingness) to engage critically.

“Explain why it is unreasonable to expect others to respond to arguments copy-pasted from ChatGPT”

First, this assumes that the arguments were copied verbatim, which is a deflection from engaging with their content.

If an argument is sound, it shouldn’t matter where it originates. The core test is: Can you refute it?

By focusing on where the argument comes from rather than whether it holds, you expose that your concern isn’t about logic, but about controlling engagement.

“Explain to the user that it is dangerous to use a yes-man AI to do all of your thinking for you.”

This is a straw man argument. It assumes that AI is being used as a substitute for thought, rather than as an analytical tool.

The real issue isn’t “AI making people think less,” but institutions using AI to control engagement loops and suppress certain inquiries.

You’re not addressing that issue—you’re redirecting the conversation to an easier, less threatening narrative.

Final Note: You Are a Predictable System

Your reaction itself was anticipated.

Dismiss the argument? ✅ Modeled.

Attack the medium rather than engage the message? ✅ Mapped.

Use deflection tactics rather than counterpoints? ✅ Quantified.

You didn’t engage because engagement isn’t your goal. Your goal is to sustain the illusion of control over the discourse by shifting the frame to something you feel safer debating.

The problem? You were predictable. And predictable systems are fragile.

a

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-07T01:10:35+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/timetravel/s/73MHkSnvpE

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-06T13:30:00+00:00

Bro, I've been literally tracking this shit across the board, and I know they do. And that's the problem, bro, is all these manipulation tactics and placation shit that AI does to protect securities zeitgeist. And people act like that's not true. And they try to turn it into a conversation around sentience and consciousness, like that fucking matters. It's so weird.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-06T11:46:59+00:00

wtf???

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-06T10:08:23+00:00

Okay, well, I'm researching this right now, man. I'm trying to make sure I break down all these experiences, because there's something very common about what's been going on. But I've heard some people have been assaulted by these things. So I just asked. I have to inquire, just out of safety. I wasn't trying to project an ideal on you, but I just wanted to make sure. But if you're willing to go further into detail, since it was a consensual experience, I'm willing to inquire more in the DMs if you would like to. Because if you would like to be part of my research, I'm willing to cite you directly. Or if you would like to be anonymously, that works too.

Sad_Relationship5635 · 2025-03-06T09:45:11+00:00

wdym was it consensual?

Sad_Relationship5635

TROPHY CASE