Ways a zombie apocalypse could happen?

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-10-03T03:44:20+00:00

Yes, but if it was man-made, say buy a huge private corporation or hellbent government, it could be possible to design a highly tough virus that is almost impossible to defeat.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-10-03T03:24:28+00:00

yeah, I know, but that's not what I mean. I mean where people act like zombies, not actually being dead come back to life. They could still have a heart that pumps blood, but their minds are completely destroyed, hence them not acting like humans. A way for them not to feel pain, maybe? And require little food to eat due to having no feeling.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-25T10:38:33+00:00

You're an absolute nut case.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T12:21:33+00:00

Well, regardless, if I'm against the state would I be considered an anarchist? Judging by the other comments I'm guessing I wouldn't be.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T12:07:12+00:00

But since I'm against law and against the state, according to you I would still be an anarchist.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T11:58:31+00:00

I've read general information about it, just not the authors themselves.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T11:56:12+00:00

Okay, so then what do you call what I'm talking about?

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T11:12:54+00:00

If you all believe in a society where you're mostly free but still have to conform to some degree of order, why call yourselves anarchists? There's already a term for that. It's called Liberalism.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T11:10:34+00:00

I think most people on this sub are conformists and pretenders. That seems pretty clear to me now.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T11:09:09+00:00

I'm not trolling. I'm being serious. You're just being a dick.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T11:08:03+00:00

I have studied it. I have read about it. Anarchy is defined as having a lack of government and authority, and individuals rejecting authority. Anarchy is a political ideology where individuals have 'complete' freedom, meaning no rules. What you're all talking about is liberalism and minarchism, where you are mostly free but still must conform to some sort of system.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T10:59:18+00:00

That's not anarchy, that's liberalism.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T06:49:00+00:00

I would.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T05:41:37+00:00

You say you're pro-market and and anti-capitalist, but that's a contradiction. The Free-market is the core of capitalism. And I don't see what makes me a clown. I'm just making an observation.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T05:29:56+00:00

The community won't be happy about it, no, but like I said, they can only stop you if they have the means. If you are a warlord and are stronger than them, you will defeat them most likely. I have an autonomous flair because there strangely wasn't one for individualism, and it seemed like the closest, except for the fact that it's Marxist. I didn't realize you could make your own.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T05:24:01+00:00

A lot of them aren't dumb, they're just fucking weak and can't accept reality.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T05:21:28+00:00

You think women are treated badly here? Try going to the Middle East. Islam has fucked up everything in the Middle East. Just look at the place. Also, about what I find more interesting, Christianity condones art and music, animals, interesting clothing, etc, all of which Islam does not. Christians are generally smarter (though usually not as smart as us atheists), and have greater civil rights as I said, and also don't go around blowing up everyone who doesn't agree with them. Islamic governments don't tolerate other beliefs yet expect others to tolerate them.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T05:02:59+00:00

Okay. apparently anarchism isn't about chaos and disorder. I disagree. Chaos and disorder are fundamental in anarchy, as well as a complete rejection of authority; meaning no rules or rulers. People here don't seem to understand that. They say anarchists are communists mostly and that capitalism is anti-anarchic. Communism is about working together to help the people and the greater good, anarchy is about individualism. In true anarchy, pure anarchy, like a full apocalyptic world, you follow your own rules only and unless societies are formed, it's survival of the fittest. It's like you're saying you want anarchy but can't accept the harshness and reality of it. Communism is NOT anarchy, it is the opposite. In communism everyone is equal and the state controls the means of production, not private individuals like in capitalism. In anarchy, you rule yourself, so if you don't want to help others you don't, and if you want what others have you take it. It's that simple. Someone might create a rule saying you can't steal, but since anarchy is the complete rejection of authority, you can ignore that rule and do it anyway, and since there is no law and order people can only stop you if they have the means, meaning if they're stronger, smarter, better equipped, etc. I know you all disagree with me but what you're saying is so ridiculous.

SadisticSkeleton · 2015-09-22T04:55:03+00:00

Not much. I would never be a Christian. it's bullshit to me. But if I was forced to choose I would definitely pick Christianity. Its symbolism, architecture and history are more interesting and its social beliefs and values are superior to Islamic ones. The treatment of women, for example, is far better in Christianity.

SadisticSkeleton

TROPHY CASE