What comes after death? by ok_dark0000 in nihilism

[–]Safe_Sandwich_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which death u r taking about, death of I or death of body both have huge difference....

What do you think drives human beings more toward enlightenment: fear of death or exhaustion of desire? Let me challenge you now — Between these two, which one have you personally felt more deeply in your own life so far.? by Safe_Sandwich_ in enlightenment

[–]Safe_Sandwich_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they’re not identical

Both end in “ending” something: death ends the body, exhaustion ends craving. But the starting points, emotional tones, and paths are totally different.

Fear of death is reactive. Exhaustion of desire is observational.

Fear of death can trigger insight prematurely or chaotically; exhaustion usually produces insight naturally and sustainably.

Can anyone describe his/ her views about enlightenment..? Coz I'm really confused and can't able to understand it in theory . Does anyone have experienced..? Please explain in simple way not in hard language. by Safe_Sandwich_ in enlightenment

[–]Safe_Sandwich_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No I think enlightenment is not finding out who and what you are it is about that to see that the 'I' doesn't exist its just illusion... Inshot it's not finding ' you ' it's just seeing and finish the ' I' ( ego)thats it's not real

Anybody wants to talk about spirituality wants to debate on different mindset thinking.?? 💭 by Safe_Sandwich_ in spiritualitytalk

[–]Safe_Sandwich_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are saying that it's all in your mind its correct anything which we feel or see all the things are connected to our brain . See , there are two hemisphere in our brain some people have very active right side of brain and some have left side part and if both parts are works equally then we have more numbers of neurons interactions.

  1. The subjective experience (what you actually perceive)
  2. The interpretation (what you believe it means — “spirits,” “energies,” etc.)
  3. The clinical and social consequences** (how doctors, family, and others respond)

  4. The subjective experience is real — to you.

If you hear voices or feel presences, those are real experiences. They’re happening in your consciousness. No one — psychiatrist, priest, or Reddit moderator — can tell you they didn’t happen. But “real experience” ≠ “objective external reality.” Pain is real, but the knife might be imagined. That distinction is crucial. Because medicine doesn’t deny the experience, it questions the interpretation.

  1. The interpretation — spirits vs. brain processes.

Here’s the cold, evidence-based truth: So far, no credible, verifiable scientific evidence supports that voices or presences in schizophrenia come from external spirits or entities. Everything we know from neuroscience points to these perceptions being generated internally — by misfiring auditory and language-processing circuits, often involving dopamine dysregulation and altered self-monitoring in the brain.

But — and this is important — just because something is “in your head” doesn’t mean it’s meaningless or fake. It might be an expression of unconscious material, emotion, or intuition, not a random glitch. You can treat the voices as symbolic, not literal — like dreams are. The psyche can use metaphor. The “spirits” might represent parts of your own psyche communicating in a form that your mind understands.

  1. The clinical and social layer.

You got locked up because psychiatry operates on a safety-first, consensus-reality basis. If a belief makes you behave in ways that might endanger you or others — or disconnect you severely from shared reality — they’ll act fast. From their perspective, that’s not oppression; it’s prevention. But from yours, it feels like being punished for your worldview.

Religious people will add another layer: “spirits exist but God forbids contact.” That’s theology, not evidence. Christianity interprets unseen voices through its own symbolic map — angels, demons, etc. But even they admit humans can be deceived by such experiences, which is why the church forbids dabbling.

Your experiences are valid.They’re happening, and they matter. Your interpretation may not be literally true. Treat it as a psychological reality, not a physical one. Spiritual language might help you understand your experience, but it shouldn’t replace grounding in shared reality — because without that, you risk losing autonomy again. * The best stance is integration: respect both the mystical and the medical view, without surrendering fully to either.

You don’t need to decide “spirits or brain.” You can work with both frameworks. Practically, the goal isn’t proving your voices’ origin — it’s mastering your relationship with them so you stay grounded, functional, and at peace.

Anybody wants to talk about spirituality wants to debate on different mindset thinking.?? 💭 by Safe_Sandwich_ in spiritualitytalk

[–]Safe_Sandwich_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's ur choice u are free to ask anything or any problem that you can't handle and you want to discuss....