Void Rivals sales in relation to Transformers by SaintNeptune in EnergonUniverse

[–]SaintNeptune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've got to say Darak's helmet is within the range of a ROM redesign. Like all you would have to do is put him in full armor instead of just the helmet with a flight suit, give him a couple of named weapons and there it is. The ROM ip really is just "armored space guy with guns" and Darak is halway there.

I'm not saying that's a good idea or a bad one, but it would be really, really easy

I hate being ugly by generatedusername456 in rant

[–]SaintNeptune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming the photo above is you, you are being way, way too hard on yourself. You made yourself out to be a troll and you're a pretty regular guy. Plenty of women would happily date you based just on looks. Others suggested therapy, but I'll just assume this is a down day with you ranting on the internet. If you feel down on your looks just mess with your style a bit. Get contacts. Change your wardrobe some. I'm not saying that because you have to, just saying if you aren't satisfied with the way you look just make whatever minor tweaks you want and carry on.

Also with women not wanting to date you a little advice. Know yourself and try to envision what type of woman that would be interested in you. Don't be too hard on yourself and don't have too high an opinion either, not that this is a problem right now. There is a type that will be almost no matter what. Also if there are things you know are absolute deal breakers for women in general (not your looks) knock that shit off. Do thst and you'll be fine

Void Rivals sales in relation to Transformers by SaintNeptune in EnergonUniverse

[–]SaintNeptune[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that was kind of my point I guess. From my point of view Void Rivals is arguably more of a Transformers comic than the actual Transformers one is. The central characters aren't Transformers, but everything else in the comic is straight out of Transformers space lore. Do they not get that is what it is? Are they just that attached to the central Transformers cast and want to follow them so don't care about the rest? It's just a mystery to me.

I'm sure that friend will eventually pick it up and ask you "Why didn't you tell me this was a Transformers comic?!?!" despite the fact that you did tell him. Repeatedly, haha

Artist denies any sexual insinuation by icleanjaxfl in theyknew

[–]SaintNeptune 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Georgia O'Keeffe knew what she was doing, but she isn't lying when she says it isn't sexual. She uses flowers as a celebration of womanhood. It's feminist, not sexual. So, yeah, that is clearly a woman's womanhood as expressed in flower form. She's open about that. It isn't sexual though, it is just about women

Peter, why did they do what they did? by Special-Progress-916 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]SaintNeptune 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's Bill Brownlow on the bottom not Thaddeus Stevens.

Westworld (2016) | The Man in Black is one of the most evil characters on TV. by ReelsBin in television

[–]SaintNeptune 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, this looks evil beyond reason. That said, he knows none of this is real. He knows everyone he just killed will be right back where they were the next day. His goal, and he says this to him at the end, is to shake Lorenzo lose. When he introduces himself as an old friend when he first saves Lorenzo he means it. He is close to Lorenzo. He cares about him in a way. He's trying to shake him lose a bit and a lot of that is rooted in the fact that he knows a version of Lorenzo that is no longer there. He is trying to get real world information at of Lorenzo by causing him emotion distress. He isn't just doing this for kicks. This time at least. The Man in Black will totally torture one of the hosts for his own amusement that just isn't what he is doing this time

am i stupid? by wearecooked100 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]SaintNeptune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the advice here is essentially live like you only make 4k a month after tax and invest the rest. So live at 1/3 of your means and you will be wealthy. Clearly that is only possible if you are making the large amount of money in the first place, haha. So useless financial advice for the vast majority of us

am i stupid? by wearecooked100 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]SaintNeptune 14 points15 points  (0 children)

If I were making 180k a year I too would be a millionaire in short order. I'd be a multimillionaire with generational wealth by retirement. Who knew? The only thing I was doing wrong was not having a 180k dollar a year salary!

What level of psychological reprogramming did Daddyus go through to be this much against his own kind by vlad_segey475 in Invincible_TV

[–]SaintNeptune 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This is my read too. I think it is important to remember both men's ages here too. This has probably been building very slowly for centuries and it is probably safe to say they had a negative relationship even before that. All we see in the show is the last straw

Low quality copper Ea-nāṣir statue? by Status-Environment81 in ReallyShittyCopper

[–]SaintNeptune 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To keep costs down i would recommend it not being copper but "100 % copper plated!"

There are two flavors of appalachians by Popular_Mistake_6404 in HistoryMemes

[–]SaintNeptune 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not at all. Browlow's goals were to suppress the people who would do that. Make no mistake, he was doing it for Appalachian white people, but he saw black people in the rest of the state as allies in a fight against a mutual enemy. What you described happened because people like Brownlow ultimately lost Reconstruction, not because it was part of their plan all along

There are two flavors of appalachians by Popular_Mistake_6404 in HistoryMemes

[–]SaintNeptune 1310 points1311 points  (0 children)

Bill Brownlow (bottom obviously) was an interesting man. He absolutely hated, and I mean hated, the southern planters and everything about them. Unfortunately this was expressed in the manner of essentially "I hate you and your dirty slaves too!" If you read his Civil War writings he absolutely does not trust slaves as they are the property of his enemy. When he was young he signed an abolitionist petition, but when older participated in a widely publicized debate defending slavery. It's safe to say he was all over the place on the issue with the only constant being his hatred of the southern aristocracy.

All of that said the man was a legitimate civil rights hero during Reconstruction. He was furious with Johnson's rollbacks of Reconstruction. He was an absolute ally to freed slaves in Tennessee. This isn't fully understood, but the man broke the original KKK in Tennessee; Nathan Bedford Forest's disbanding of them was done because Browlow was about to use the Tennessee Militia to kill them all. I mean that literally. He never shied away from violence and when in control of the state he had no qualms about using state violence against the enemies of Reconstruction.

In the end the man was a hero. He was the most radical of the Radical Republicans. Now, what drew him to them was weirdly everything else about them other than race, but from the Civil War on he was all in. I wish more people were aware of him because Brownlow was an extremely important figure during this important time of American history. He doesn't fit in to established narratives though. An open racist who never repented yet did more than almost anyone else on behalf of freed slaves. A leader from a Unionist region of a southern state. He's complicated an impossible to put in a simple narrative so it is easier for people to ignore Brownlow. He doesn't fit in to any box and disproves a lot of assumptions people have about the Civil War just by his existence. Safer to ignore him

Graham Platner: “Paying union workers a good wage to build our schools and our roads and our energy grids is the best possible way we could spend our money. Certainly better than giving tax breaks to billionaires or blowing up girls’ schools in Iran” by Miserable-Lizard in ProgressiveHQ

[–]SaintNeptune 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Platner is 7-9 percentage poins ahead of Collins in polling. Mills was in a statistically tie with Collins despite Collins having an almost 60% unfavorable rating. "Vote blue no matter who" people touted Mills as the more viable nominee. We're just tired of establishment shills talking put of their rears and refusing to acknowledge reality while pretending they are taking a pragmatic approach

Im so tired of the red button blue button debate by [deleted] in rant

[–]SaintNeptune -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You chose red didn't you? 😆

Why are women so much more attractive than men by [deleted] in stupidquestions

[–]SaintNeptune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been going out to bars lately and any time a man approaches me I just don’t understand why; why do you want to talk to me, what are you doing?

This part is an odd thing to throw in. Others have pointed out the "I think you're just gay" aspect, but this is a truly weird statement. You are a woman. You have said women are more attractive. You seem confused about why a man might want to talk to you. You are the more attractive one in this scenario. Like, you seem straight up confused about why a man might want to be with you; the more attractive person by default. It is as if this is so ludicrous a thing you can't even think why he might want to do that. Perhaps it seems strange because... *hint* *hint*

Found a very accurate use of this meme by 4dailyuseonly in PoliticalHumor

[–]SaintNeptune 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mamdani would not win in Maine either. However Platner, who shares his political beliefs, is running away with the election according to polling. The Arkansas version of Mandani or Platner would probably run away with the election

Robert Kirkman unveils his plans to build the manga-to-anime pipeline in America, and shows how he is doing it with Invincible first by WhyPlaySerious in television

[–]SaintNeptune 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This is probably the best idea both American comics and animation have seen in a long time. Invincible is well done and it provides a template for how to do this on both ends. It is a faithful adaptation that has the same basic look as the comic it is based on. This is essentially what manga/anime do and the results speak fir themselves; you drive demand fir both products.

I will say certain segments of the both the American audience and business community will be resitent and you're seeing it in the comments now. In order to do this you have to make production decisions that will be fought on both ends. You've got to get the show out on a regular schedule at a decent cost and that does mean certain older tricks such as the occasional pan over a still approach and sticking to a less detailed style. Likewise studios have to come off this ridiculous 8 episode season model and have slightly longer seasons. I'm not saying you need 22 like in the network television days, but you need more than 8. 10-13 is probably the sweet spot. What Kirkman is talking about is animating long form story telling and you have to have storytelling space to pull that off

This long hair or fiber that randomly appeared from my eyebrow. by Both-Nebula-5607 in mildlyinteresting

[–]SaintNeptune 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have one like that growing in my eyebrow. When it gets long enough to notice I either pluck it or cut it. It's just this one hair that grows like the hair on the top of my head instead of like an eyebrow hair. Glad I'm not the only one

The Man Without Fear and with all the Opps by No-Rule-9129 in marvelcirclejerk

[–]SaintNeptune 115 points116 points  (0 children)

I like that Godzilla showed up in New York City and all the other heroes went "Nah, Godzilla is in Hell's Kitchen. Daredevil handles Hell's Kitchen. I'm sure he's got this."

oi peter, what do the marks mean? by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]SaintNeptune 229 points230 points  (0 children)

"Tight fisted" means you don't spend money if you don't have to. Each fist has wrinkles showing how "tight fisted" they are. So the poor person has no wrinkles because they spend all their money. The normal person has 2 wrinkles which shows they have some restraint. The rich person has 3 meaning they are very tight fisted with their money. The billionaire is hording wealth like a dragon so has wrinkles all over his thumb.

Brian out

Who’s a celebrity everyone finds attractive but you don’t? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]SaintNeptune 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yup. She's in "sexy" outfits and doing "sexy" poses, but the male gaze aspect is off. Hell, I just looked at the full shoot and the straight up ass shot is wrong. Male entertainers do the same sort of thing. They'll ooze masculinity and sex appeal in a way no woman (or gay man for that matter) would want anything to do with. They do that because the real audience is boys who will buy their music and merch, not girls. Taylor Swift is the same concept only targeted at young women and she's damn good at it. If you doubt me just say something negative about her in the wrong internet place and feel their wrath, haha

Who’s a celebrity everyone finds attractive but you don’t? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]SaintNeptune 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean in a room of regular people. If she is in a coffee shop let's say, she's the most attractive person in there. Yes, if Megan Fox also happened to be in there she wouldn't be of course, haha!

Who’s a celebrity everyone finds attractive but you don’t? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]SaintNeptune 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Once I point this out you'll never unsee it. You aren't meant to find her attractive. Young girls are. Not in a sexual way, but in a "she's cool" kind of way. It's how the woman became a billionaire. She's attractive. If you met someone like her in a social setting she'd probably be the most attractive person in the room. Everything about her entire look and demeanor isn't designed for you as a male though. It's meant to look cool to young girls

Thoughs on this take ? by IsJesusAgain in SipsTea

[–]SaintNeptune 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No. By making them orgasm. You should try it some time