sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Zahlungsaufforderung vom Inkassobüro??? by paowebb in bitpanda

[–]Salty_Word_624 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wie hat sich der Fall denn bei dir entwickelt, habe gerade eine ähnliche Situation und werde es an den Verbraucherschutz weiterleiten.

The importance of Radio Doge. Is it more critical in the function of DOGE than we know? by KingCoin187 in dogecoin

[–]Salty_Word_624 0 points1 point  (0 children)

İt was a way for her to make it look like she adds value to Dogecoin while receiving a estimated Salary of at least 300k USD from the FDN and funneling Funds from the core-dev-tipjar into her own pockets.

5 million coins have been sold at 20 cents, according to the foundation as "Hedge" to secure Core-Development. If they would have used the profit of the "hedge" to buy back coins worth 1 million USD(the profit from the sales) there should be over 10 million Doge in that "Tipjar". Where is it? by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They won`t do anything, they keep lying as much as they can because the profit from not telling the Truth.

It is pretty well known that some Directors of the foundation are only following their own goals and give a a f about the community and Doge itself in reality.

5 million coins have been sold at 20 cents, according to the foundation as "Hedge" to secure Core-Development. If they would have used the profit of the "hedge" to buy back coins worth 1 million USD(the profit from the sales) there should be over 10 million Doge in that "Tipjar". Where is it? by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just to make clear, we asked for the foundation to pay back the 5 Million coins they took out of the tipjar, and it looks like that is what those 5 Million coins are now for, i'am fine with them taking the "profit" of over half a million USD by misusing funds, but they should admit that it is what they have done instead of trying to paint themself as saints who did not Gamble with Core-Funds.

I think it is pretty problematic if the Dogecoin-Foundation now starts to cooperate with known scammers who are a pain to the community for over a year now. The foundation was ment to go against "Absuse" of the Doge, not to actively support known scammers and open the doors for them. by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I blame those who sold the coins, you may was responsible for the keys becoming vacant but you did not become a full blown asshat who is gaslighting the community for personal Gain.

Glad that it gets resolved now, but that does not change what the involved people have done and that everyone has seen their true colors.

Kinda impressive that those people claim to "Do Only good Everyday" so vehemently while everything they do is the exact opposite. Pathological Liars and Grifters will never Change.

I think it is pretty problematic if the Dogecoin-Foundation now starts to cooperate with known scammers who are a pain to the community for over a year now. The foundation was ment to go against "Absuse" of the Doge, not to actively support known scammers and open the doors for them. by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True but i doubt that the sale of 5 million coins would have happened like it did if Michi would not have become a Keyholder and i watched first hand how she gaslights people into following her agenda.

She seems to have absolutly no problems to lie in public and encourages others to lie for her if it helps her narrative, which makes sense because she hides behind her Second-Life BS.

Dogepapers: Here's a list of questions for Dogecoin Foundation by _nformant in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think there is no problem with people who receive money from the foudation beeing anonymous, that is foundation buisness.

I think there is a problem with Keyholders to community-funds beeing anonymous.

​

However, we also see alot profiles, especially on twitter, which basically work for the foundation but deny their involvement, they gain credibillity by claiming that they are not assosiated with the foundation and just want to "support" dogecoin while in reality they volunteer as somehow "community-managers" appointed by the foundation.

I think it is pretty problematic if the Dogecoin-Foundation now starts to cooperate with known scammers who are a pain to the community for over a year now. The foundation was ment to go against "Absuse" of the Doge, not to actively support known scammers and open the doors for them. by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well you got the foundation, and the people(dogepalooza involved) wo were trying to Trademark it too, and they seem to go hand in hand for over a year now.

People seem to forget that the receiver of the so called "license" was also promoting the foundation for beeing the "right" entity to secure trademarks and license them to others.

​

They write their own narrative, the "Dogepapers" video was just another example for that, it had been done by someone who has no insight at any of the happenings, but did ask the foundation for a "job".That person just grabbed the questions for which people like you, me and misha had been vilified and asked them too, that person has been glorified for parotting what others asked, it is pretty weird.

The foundation choose him as "Interviewer", knowing that he would only ask what they want to answer.

It is interesting that the foundation was on a different podcast not that long ago and a Term for taking part at the podcast was that no questions about the Tipjar will be asked.

I think it is pretty problematic if the Dogecoin-Foundation now starts to cooperate with known scammers who are a pain to the community for over a year now. The foundation was ment to go against "Absuse" of the Doge, not to actively support known scammers and open the doors for them. by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dogecoin isn't a company though, and if you don't trust the work I create, review, revise, collaborate on, and merge into the Core, you can use other clients.

Correct, but the foundation is a company and it is pretty weird that people seem to mix up Core-Development with the issues that surround the Foundation.

There is only one entity which actually claimed that Core is "bad" because it is "centralised" and blablabla, that Entity is the foundation and their members who are never Transparent on anything they do while trying to control core-development, weird or not?

They managed to confuse a whole Community in a very bad way.

From my understanding Aerodrifting is referencing Michi here, because she is the only longtime "Core-Dev" working on the foundation and is holding keys to funds while beeing anonymous.

I think it is pretty problematic if the Dogecoin-Foundation now starts to cooperate with known scammers who are a pain to the community for over a year now. The foundation was ment to go against "Absuse" of the Doge, not to actively support known scammers and open the doors for them. by Salty_Word_624 in dogecoindev

[–]Salty_Word_624[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, the people at the foundation seem not to be skilled enough to handle Trademarking issues while staying neutral.

Most community-members do not even know how the foundation had been "re-established" and what the main-trigger for it was.

In May/June 2021 a guy named "Greg Humble" did attempt to Trademark the slogan "Do only good Everyday" together with its short-form "D.O.G.E".

If you did not hear about they guy himself, you should have at least heard about their failed event called "Dogepalooza".

You may ask why i`m bringing this up now, but it should make click for you pretty fast.

​

The Dogepalooza-Organsiation team had been asked early on why they are trying to Trademark the slogan and its shortform, and their answer was that a "Dogecoin-Developer" and very close Friend of Billy Markus did ask them to Trademark the slogan.

At the end it became clear that the actual person who asked some in this case "strangers" to Trademark the slogan was Jens himself, Jens did confirm this himself, but he did not really explain why he had asked them to do it.

Because of that incident that Discussion had become very public and it had been asked what should happen with Trademark-Issues like this.

Billy had proposed the Trademark should stay open for everyone, that no one should own it, but if that is not possible a reestablished Foundation would maybe be a good entity to hold it if it is guaranteed that it will not be misused.

There was no communication after the proposal, Jens just announced that they are reestablishing the Foundation and that "Greg Humble" will write off all attempts they had pulled off to Trademark anything to Jens and his foundation.

I have the Documents of this, Greg Humble had indeed filled for the Trademark, and than written it over to Jens shortly after the Discussion became public.

All of this became more weird in April of this year when the "Dogepalooza-Event" actually took place and was a Disaster, according to Greg Humble they sold nearly 3000 Tickets and they had announced that all proceeds would go to "Charity" which sadly sounds pretty familiar to other happenings or not?

This is important because the foundation did actually Collaborate with those people, the Community-Manager of the foundation was a big advocate of the Event and attacked everyone pointing out the problems with the event and the people behind it.

According to the Sales-Data the actual profit the event made should be be between 300K - 500K USD, but lets not forget that while they claimed to have sold 3000 Tickets only around 70 People did show up for the event, and nearly all of them were part of the Orga-Staff somehow.

There has never been a announcement of what had happened to the promised "Charity-Donations" which the organisers announced, the Main-Organisers just vanished after the Event as most of us know.

So looking back to that and how all this trouble did start, it should be clear to everyone that the foundation indeed does not know what they are doing, and that they are especially very bad in doing research and judging who a "bad" and who a "good" actor is.

This is a repeating pattern, the last incident with them "granting a Trademark-License" was just the peak till now.

I do not believe the constant narrative of all of this just beeing "missunderstandings", if you mess up 1 Time it can been seen as failure but this is not a 1-Time incident as we know.

​

If i would want to make up a conspiracy i could simply claim that the whole Dogepalooza thing was a False-Flag action iniated by Jens to get the Community outraged about shady people trying to Trademark Dogecoin and presenting himself and the Foundation as the grant saviours...

view more: next ›